Cargando…

The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation

Purpose: To develop a physical understanding of ureterorenoscopy irrigation, we derive mathematical models from basic physical principles and compare these predictions with the results of benchtop experiments. Mathematical modeling can be used to understand the role of inlet pressure, tip deflection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Jessica G., Turney, Benjamin W., Rauniyar, Niraj P., Harrah, Timothy P., Waters, Sarah L., Moulton, Derek E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30421625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0707
_version_ 1783390856011579392
author Williams, Jessica G.
Turney, Benjamin W.
Rauniyar, Niraj P.
Harrah, Timothy P.
Waters, Sarah L.
Moulton, Derek E.
author_facet Williams, Jessica G.
Turney, Benjamin W.
Rauniyar, Niraj P.
Harrah, Timothy P.
Waters, Sarah L.
Moulton, Derek E.
author_sort Williams, Jessica G.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To develop a physical understanding of ureterorenoscopy irrigation, we derive mathematical models from basic physical principles and compare these predictions with the results of benchtop experiments. Mathematical modeling can be used to understand the role of inlet pressure, tip deflection, the presence of working tools, geometric properties of the instruments used, and material properties of the irrigation fluid on resulting flow rate. Materials and Methods: We develop theoretical models to describe irrigation flow in an idealized setup and compare with benchtop experiments for flow through a straight scope, a scope with a deflected tip, and a scope with a working tool inserted. The benchtop experiments were performed using Boston Scientific LithoVue ureteroscope and a variety of Boston Scientific working tools. Standard ureteroscope working channels have circular cross sections, but using theoretical models we investigate whether modifications to the cross-sectional geometry can enhance flow rates. Results: The theoretical flow predictions are confirmed by experimental results. Tip deflection is shown to have a negligible effect on flow rate, but the presence of working tools decreases flow significantly (for a fixed driving pressure). Flow rate is predicted to improve when tools are placed at the edge of the channel, rather than the center, and modifying the cross-sectional shape from a circle to an ellipse can further increase flow rate. Conclusions: A mathematical framework is formulated and shown to accurately predict the properties of ureteroscope irrigation flow. The theoretical approach has significant potential in quantifying irrigation flow and improving ureteroscope design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6352503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63525032019-01-31 The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation Williams, Jessica G. Turney, Benjamin W. Rauniyar, Niraj P. Harrah, Timothy P. Waters, Sarah L. Moulton, Derek E. J Endourol Experimental Endourology Purpose: To develop a physical understanding of ureterorenoscopy irrigation, we derive mathematical models from basic physical principles and compare these predictions with the results of benchtop experiments. Mathematical modeling can be used to understand the role of inlet pressure, tip deflection, the presence of working tools, geometric properties of the instruments used, and material properties of the irrigation fluid on resulting flow rate. Materials and Methods: We develop theoretical models to describe irrigation flow in an idealized setup and compare with benchtop experiments for flow through a straight scope, a scope with a deflected tip, and a scope with a working tool inserted. The benchtop experiments were performed using Boston Scientific LithoVue ureteroscope and a variety of Boston Scientific working tools. Standard ureteroscope working channels have circular cross sections, but using theoretical models we investigate whether modifications to the cross-sectional geometry can enhance flow rates. Results: The theoretical flow predictions are confirmed by experimental results. Tip deflection is shown to have a negligible effect on flow rate, but the presence of working tools decreases flow significantly (for a fixed driving pressure). Flow rate is predicted to improve when tools are placed at the edge of the channel, rather than the center, and modifying the cross-sectional shape from a circle to an ellipse can further increase flow rate. Conclusions: A mathematical framework is formulated and shown to accurately predict the properties of ureteroscope irrigation flow. The theoretical approach has significant potential in quantifying irrigation flow and improving ureteroscope design. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019-01-01 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6352503/ /pubmed/30421625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0707 Text en © Jessica G. Williams, et al. 2019; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Experimental Endourology
Williams, Jessica G.
Turney, Benjamin W.
Rauniyar, Niraj P.
Harrah, Timothy P.
Waters, Sarah L.
Moulton, Derek E.
The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation
title The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation
title_full The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation
title_fullStr The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation
title_full_unstemmed The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation
title_short The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation
title_sort fluid mechanics of ureteroscope irrigation
topic Experimental Endourology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30421625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0707
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsjessicag thefluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT turneybenjaminw thefluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT rauniyarnirajp thefluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT harrahtimothyp thefluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT waterssarahl thefluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT moultondereke thefluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT williamsjessicag fluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT turneybenjaminw fluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT rauniyarnirajp fluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT harrahtimothyp fluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT waterssarahl fluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation
AT moultondereke fluidmechanicsofureteroscopeirrigation