Cargando…

Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design)

AIM: This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ((18)FDG-PET/CT) compared to whole body (WB) magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with background body signal suppression (MR/DWIBS) in lesions de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rezk, Mahmoud, Nasr, Ibrahim, Ali, Ismail, Abdelhamed, Heba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30713370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_121_18
_version_ 1783390883913138176
author Rezk, Mahmoud
Nasr, Ibrahim
Ali, Ismail
Abdelhamed, Heba
author_facet Rezk, Mahmoud
Nasr, Ibrahim
Ali, Ismail
Abdelhamed, Heba
author_sort Rezk, Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ((18)FDG-PET/CT) compared to whole body (WB) magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with background body signal suppression (MR/DWIBS) in lesions detection in patients with recurrent breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three female patients with suspected breast cancer recurrence by clinical, laboratory, or conventional imaging underwent both (18)FDG-PET/CT and WB MR/DWIBS. WB (18)FDG-PET/CT was performed using the standard technique. WB MR/DWIBS acquired sequences were WB DWI with short tau inversion recovery (STIR), coronal T1, and coronal STIR. Both (18)FDG-PET/CT and WB-magnetic resonance imaging/DWIBS were independently interpreted using visual qualitative and quantitative analysis. Pathological findings and combined clinical/radiological follow-up data were used as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were calculated for both techniques. RESULTS: PET/CT demonstrated higher specificity and sensitivity indices than MR/DWIBS in the detection of the nodal and distant lesions, while the latter displayed higher sensitivity in the detection of local breast lesions. The overall sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy of PET/CT were 84.8%, 86.3%, 90.4%, 78.7%, and 85.4% versus 82.1%, 78.0%, 85.2%, 74.0%, and 80.5% for MR/DWIBS. A high degree of agreement existed between PET/CT and MR-DWIBS. CONCLUSION: (18)FDG-PET/CT is more sensitive and has superiority in the assessment of nodal and distant lesions than DWIBS that has a potential superior role in the assessment of local breast lesions. DWIBS has a promising and helpful complementary tool for (18)FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with proven malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6352640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63526402019-02-01 Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design) Rezk, Mahmoud Nasr, Ibrahim Ali, Ismail Abdelhamed, Heba Indian J Nucl Med Original Article AIM: This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ((18)FDG-PET/CT) compared to whole body (WB) magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with background body signal suppression (MR/DWIBS) in lesions detection in patients with recurrent breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three female patients with suspected breast cancer recurrence by clinical, laboratory, or conventional imaging underwent both (18)FDG-PET/CT and WB MR/DWIBS. WB (18)FDG-PET/CT was performed using the standard technique. WB MR/DWIBS acquired sequences were WB DWI with short tau inversion recovery (STIR), coronal T1, and coronal STIR. Both (18)FDG-PET/CT and WB-magnetic resonance imaging/DWIBS were independently interpreted using visual qualitative and quantitative analysis. Pathological findings and combined clinical/radiological follow-up data were used as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were calculated for both techniques. RESULTS: PET/CT demonstrated higher specificity and sensitivity indices than MR/DWIBS in the detection of the nodal and distant lesions, while the latter displayed higher sensitivity in the detection of local breast lesions. The overall sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy of PET/CT were 84.8%, 86.3%, 90.4%, 78.7%, and 85.4% versus 82.1%, 78.0%, 85.2%, 74.0%, and 80.5% for MR/DWIBS. A high degree of agreement existed between PET/CT and MR-DWIBS. CONCLUSION: (18)FDG-PET/CT is more sensitive and has superiority in the assessment of nodal and distant lesions than DWIBS that has a potential superior role in the assessment of local breast lesions. DWIBS has a promising and helpful complementary tool for (18)FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with proven malignancies. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6352640/ /pubmed/30713370 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_121_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rezk, Mahmoud
Nasr, Ibrahim
Ali, Ismail
Abdelhamed, Heba
Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design)
title Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design)
title_full Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design)
title_fullStr Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design)
title_short Comparative Study between (18)F FDG-PET/CT and Whole Body MRI DWIBS in Assessment of Recurrent Breast Cancer (Prospective, Comparative, Cross-sectional Study Design)
title_sort comparative study between (18)f fdg-pet/ct and whole body mri dwibs in assessment of recurrent breast cancer (prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study design)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30713370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_121_18
work_keys_str_mv AT rezkmahmoud comparativestudybetween18ffdgpetctandwholebodymridwibsinassessmentofrecurrentbreastcancerprospectivecomparativecrosssectionalstudydesign
AT nasribrahim comparativestudybetween18ffdgpetctandwholebodymridwibsinassessmentofrecurrentbreastcancerprospectivecomparativecrosssectionalstudydesign
AT aliismail comparativestudybetween18ffdgpetctandwholebodymridwibsinassessmentofrecurrentbreastcancerprospectivecomparativecrosssectionalstudydesign
AT abdelhamedheba comparativestudybetween18ffdgpetctandwholebodymridwibsinassessmentofrecurrentbreastcancerprospectivecomparativecrosssectionalstudydesign