Cargando…

Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature relating to the impact of multiple co-occurring modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature relating to the impact of co-occurring key risk factors for incident cognitiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Ruth, Booth, Andrew, Rockwood, Kenneth, Peters, Jean, D’Este, Catherine, Anstey, Kaarin J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022846
_version_ 1783390912268730368
author Peters, Ruth
Booth, Andrew
Rockwood, Kenneth
Peters, Jean
D’Este, Catherine
Anstey, Kaarin J
author_facet Peters, Ruth
Booth, Andrew
Rockwood, Kenneth
Peters, Jean
D’Este, Catherine
Anstey, Kaarin J
author_sort Peters, Ruth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature relating to the impact of multiple co-occurring modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature relating to the impact of co-occurring key risk factors for incident cognitive decline and dementia. All abstracts and full text were screened independently by two reviewers and each article assessed for bias using a standard checklist. A fixed effects meta-analysis was undertaken. DATA SOURCES: Databases Medline, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from 1999 to 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: For inclusion articles were required to report longitudinal data from participants free of cognitive decline at baseline, with formal assessment of cognitive function or dementia during follow-up, and an aim to examine the impact of additive or clustered comorbid risk factor burden in with two or more core modifiable risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-nine full-text articles were examined. Twenty-two articles (18 studies) were included reporting data on >40 000 participants. Included studies consistently reported an increased risk associated with greater numbers of intraindividual risk factors or unhealthy behaviours and the opposite for healthy or protective behaviours. A meta-analysis of studies with dementia outcomes resulted in a pooled relative risk for dementia of 1.20 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.39) for one risk factor, 1.65 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.94) for two and 2.21 (95% CI 1.78 to 2.73) for three or more, relative to no risk factors. Limitations include dependence on published results and variations in study outcome, cognitive assessment, length of follow-up and definition of risk factor exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the reported associations, the consistency across studies and the suggestion of a dose response supports a need to keep modifiable risk factor exposure to a minimum and to avoid exposure to additional modifiable risks. Further research is needed to establish whether particular combinations of risk factors confer greater risk than others. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 42016052914.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6352772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63527722019-03-10 Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Peters, Ruth Booth, Andrew Rockwood, Kenneth Peters, Jean D’Este, Catherine Anstey, Kaarin J BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature relating to the impact of multiple co-occurring modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature relating to the impact of co-occurring key risk factors for incident cognitive decline and dementia. All abstracts and full text were screened independently by two reviewers and each article assessed for bias using a standard checklist. A fixed effects meta-analysis was undertaken. DATA SOURCES: Databases Medline, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from 1999 to 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: For inclusion articles were required to report longitudinal data from participants free of cognitive decline at baseline, with formal assessment of cognitive function or dementia during follow-up, and an aim to examine the impact of additive or clustered comorbid risk factor burden in with two or more core modifiable risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-nine full-text articles were examined. Twenty-two articles (18 studies) were included reporting data on >40 000 participants. Included studies consistently reported an increased risk associated with greater numbers of intraindividual risk factors or unhealthy behaviours and the opposite for healthy or protective behaviours. A meta-analysis of studies with dementia outcomes resulted in a pooled relative risk for dementia of 1.20 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.39) for one risk factor, 1.65 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.94) for two and 2.21 (95% CI 1.78 to 2.73) for three or more, relative to no risk factors. Limitations include dependence on published results and variations in study outcome, cognitive assessment, length of follow-up and definition of risk factor exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the reported associations, the consistency across studies and the suggestion of a dose response supports a need to keep modifiable risk factor exposure to a minimum and to avoid exposure to additional modifiable risks. Further research is needed to establish whether particular combinations of risk factors confer greater risk than others. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 42016052914. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6352772/ /pubmed/30782689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022846 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Peters, Ruth
Booth, Andrew
Rockwood, Kenneth
Peters, Jean
D’Este, Catherine
Anstey, Kaarin J
Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022846
work_keys_str_mv AT petersruth combiningmodifiableriskfactorsandriskofdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boothandrew combiningmodifiableriskfactorsandriskofdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rockwoodkenneth combiningmodifiableriskfactorsandriskofdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT petersjean combiningmodifiableriskfactorsandriskofdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT destecatherine combiningmodifiableriskfactorsandriskofdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ansteykaarinj combiningmodifiableriskfactorsandriskofdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis