Cargando…

Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intuition is an important part of human decision-making and can be explained by the dual-process theory where analytical and non-analytical reasoning processes continually interact. These processes can also be identified in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. The valuable rol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van den Brink, Nydia, Holbrechts, Birgit, Brand, Paul L P, Stolper, Erik C F, Van Royen, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724
_version_ 1783390925940064256
author Van den Brink, Nydia
Holbrechts, Birgit
Brand, Paul L P
Stolper, Erik C F
Van Royen, Paul
author_facet Van den Brink, Nydia
Holbrechts, Birgit
Brand, Paul L P
Stolper, Erik C F
Van Royen, Paul
author_sort Van den Brink, Nydia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intuition is an important part of human decision-making and can be explained by the dual-process theory where analytical and non-analytical reasoning processes continually interact. These processes can also be identified in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. The valuable role of intuition, including gut feelings, has been shown among general practitioners and nurses, but less is known about its role among hospital specialists. This study focused on the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists, how they value, experience and use intuition. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight hospital specialists in the Netherlands and Belgium participated in six focus groups. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically coded. A circular and iterative analysis was applied until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Despite initial reservations regarding the term intuition, all participants agreed that intuition plays an important role in their diagnostic reasoning process. Many agreed that intuition could guide them, but were cautious not to be misguided. They were especially cautious since intuition does not have probative force, for example, in medicolegal situations. ‘On-the-job experience’ was regarded as a precondition to relying on intuition. Some participants viewed intuition as non-rational and invalid. All participants said that intuitive hunches must be followed by analytical reasoning. Cultural differences were not found. Both the doctor as a person and his/her specialty were seen as important determinants for using intuition. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital specialists use intuitive elements in their diagnostic reasoning, in line with general human decision-making models. Nevertheless, they appear to disagree more on its role and value than previous research has shown among general practitioners. A better understanding of how to take advantage of intuition, while avoiding pitfalls, and how to develop ‘skilled’ intuition may improve the quality of hospital specialists’ diagnostic reasoning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6352845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63528452019-02-21 Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study Van den Brink, Nydia Holbrechts, Birgit Brand, Paul L P Stolper, Erik C F Van Royen, Paul BMJ Open Diagnostics BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intuition is an important part of human decision-making and can be explained by the dual-process theory where analytical and non-analytical reasoning processes continually interact. These processes can also be identified in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. The valuable role of intuition, including gut feelings, has been shown among general practitioners and nurses, but less is known about its role among hospital specialists. This study focused on the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists, how they value, experience and use intuition. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight hospital specialists in the Netherlands and Belgium participated in six focus groups. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically coded. A circular and iterative analysis was applied until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Despite initial reservations regarding the term intuition, all participants agreed that intuition plays an important role in their diagnostic reasoning process. Many agreed that intuition could guide them, but were cautious not to be misguided. They were especially cautious since intuition does not have probative force, for example, in medicolegal situations. ‘On-the-job experience’ was regarded as a precondition to relying on intuition. Some participants viewed intuition as non-rational and invalid. All participants said that intuitive hunches must be followed by analytical reasoning. Cultural differences were not found. Both the doctor as a person and his/her specialty were seen as important determinants for using intuition. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital specialists use intuitive elements in their diagnostic reasoning, in line with general human decision-making models. Nevertheless, they appear to disagree more on its role and value than previous research has shown among general practitioners. A better understanding of how to take advantage of intuition, while avoiding pitfalls, and how to develop ‘skilled’ intuition may improve the quality of hospital specialists’ diagnostic reasoning. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6352845/ /pubmed/30696671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Van den Brink, Nydia
Holbrechts, Birgit
Brand, Paul L P
Stolper, Erik C F
Van Royen, Paul
Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
title Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
title_full Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
title_fullStr Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
title_short Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
title_sort role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbrinknydia roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy
AT holbrechtsbirgit roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy
AT brandpaullp roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy
AT stolpererikcf roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy
AT vanroyenpaul roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy