Cargando…
Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intuition is an important part of human decision-making and can be explained by the dual-process theory where analytical and non-analytical reasoning processes continually interact. These processes can also be identified in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. The valuable rol...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724 |
_version_ | 1783390925940064256 |
---|---|
author | Van den Brink, Nydia Holbrechts, Birgit Brand, Paul L P Stolper, Erik C F Van Royen, Paul |
author_facet | Van den Brink, Nydia Holbrechts, Birgit Brand, Paul L P Stolper, Erik C F Van Royen, Paul |
author_sort | Van den Brink, Nydia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intuition is an important part of human decision-making and can be explained by the dual-process theory where analytical and non-analytical reasoning processes continually interact. These processes can also be identified in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. The valuable role of intuition, including gut feelings, has been shown among general practitioners and nurses, but less is known about its role among hospital specialists. This study focused on the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists, how they value, experience and use intuition. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight hospital specialists in the Netherlands and Belgium participated in six focus groups. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically coded. A circular and iterative analysis was applied until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Despite initial reservations regarding the term intuition, all participants agreed that intuition plays an important role in their diagnostic reasoning process. Many agreed that intuition could guide them, but were cautious not to be misguided. They were especially cautious since intuition does not have probative force, for example, in medicolegal situations. ‘On-the-job experience’ was regarded as a precondition to relying on intuition. Some participants viewed intuition as non-rational and invalid. All participants said that intuitive hunches must be followed by analytical reasoning. Cultural differences were not found. Both the doctor as a person and his/her specialty were seen as important determinants for using intuition. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital specialists use intuitive elements in their diagnostic reasoning, in line with general human decision-making models. Nevertheless, they appear to disagree more on its role and value than previous research has shown among general practitioners. A better understanding of how to take advantage of intuition, while avoiding pitfalls, and how to develop ‘skilled’ intuition may improve the quality of hospital specialists’ diagnostic reasoning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6352845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63528452019-02-21 Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study Van den Brink, Nydia Holbrechts, Birgit Brand, Paul L P Stolper, Erik C F Van Royen, Paul BMJ Open Diagnostics BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intuition is an important part of human decision-making and can be explained by the dual-process theory where analytical and non-analytical reasoning processes continually interact. These processes can also be identified in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. The valuable role of intuition, including gut feelings, has been shown among general practitioners and nurses, but less is known about its role among hospital specialists. This study focused on the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists, how they value, experience and use intuition. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight hospital specialists in the Netherlands and Belgium participated in six focus groups. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically coded. A circular and iterative analysis was applied until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Despite initial reservations regarding the term intuition, all participants agreed that intuition plays an important role in their diagnostic reasoning process. Many agreed that intuition could guide them, but were cautious not to be misguided. They were especially cautious since intuition does not have probative force, for example, in medicolegal situations. ‘On-the-job experience’ was regarded as a precondition to relying on intuition. Some participants viewed intuition as non-rational and invalid. All participants said that intuitive hunches must be followed by analytical reasoning. Cultural differences were not found. Both the doctor as a person and his/her specialty were seen as important determinants for using intuition. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital specialists use intuitive elements in their diagnostic reasoning, in line with general human decision-making models. Nevertheless, they appear to disagree more on its role and value than previous research has shown among general practitioners. A better understanding of how to take advantage of intuition, while avoiding pitfalls, and how to develop ‘skilled’ intuition may improve the quality of hospital specialists’ diagnostic reasoning. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6352845/ /pubmed/30696671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostics Van den Brink, Nydia Holbrechts, Birgit Brand, Paul L P Stolper, Erik C F Van Royen, Paul Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study |
title | Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study |
title_full | Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study |
title_fullStr | Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study |
title_short | Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study |
title_sort | role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study |
topic | Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbrinknydia roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy AT holbrechtsbirgit roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy AT brandpaullp roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy AT stolpererikcf roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy AT vanroyenpaul roleofintuitiveknowledgeinthediagnosticreasoningofhospitalspecialistsafocusgroupstudy |