Cargando…

Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures

Previous studies have demonstrated that skin vibration is an important factor affecting the roughness perception of fine textures. For coarse textures, the determining physical factor is much less clear and there are indications that this might be participant-dependent. In this paper, we focused on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natsume, Makiko, Tanaka, Yoshihiro, Kappers, Astrid M. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6353187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30699197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211407
_version_ 1783390976920780800
author Natsume, Makiko
Tanaka, Yoshihiro
Kappers, Astrid M. L.
author_facet Natsume, Makiko
Tanaka, Yoshihiro
Kappers, Astrid M. L.
author_sort Natsume, Makiko
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have demonstrated that skin vibration is an important factor affecting the roughness perception of fine textures. For coarse textures, the determining physical factor is much less clear and there are indications that this might be participant-dependent. In this paper, we focused on roughness perception of both coarse and fine textures of different materials (glass particle surfaces and sandpapers). We investigated the relationship between subjective roughness ratings and three physical parameters (skin vibration, friction coefficient, and particle size) within a group of 30 participants. Results of the glass particle surfaces showed both spatial information (particle size) and temporal information (skin vibration) had a high correlation with subjective roughness ratings. The former correlation was slightly but significantly higher than the latter. The results also indicated different weights of temporal information and spatial information for roughness ratings among participants. Roughness ratings of a different material (sandpaper versus glass particles) could be either larger, similar or smaller, indicating differences among individuals. The best way to describe our results is that in their perceptual evaluation of roughness, different individuals weight temporal information, spatial information, and other mechanical properties differently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6353187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63531872019-02-15 Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures Natsume, Makiko Tanaka, Yoshihiro Kappers, Astrid M. L. PLoS One Research Article Previous studies have demonstrated that skin vibration is an important factor affecting the roughness perception of fine textures. For coarse textures, the determining physical factor is much less clear and there are indications that this might be participant-dependent. In this paper, we focused on roughness perception of both coarse and fine textures of different materials (glass particle surfaces and sandpapers). We investigated the relationship between subjective roughness ratings and three physical parameters (skin vibration, friction coefficient, and particle size) within a group of 30 participants. Results of the glass particle surfaces showed both spatial information (particle size) and temporal information (skin vibration) had a high correlation with subjective roughness ratings. The former correlation was slightly but significantly higher than the latter. The results also indicated different weights of temporal information and spatial information for roughness ratings among participants. Roughness ratings of a different material (sandpaper versus glass particles) could be either larger, similar or smaller, indicating differences among individuals. The best way to describe our results is that in their perceptual evaluation of roughness, different individuals weight temporal information, spatial information, and other mechanical properties differently. Public Library of Science 2019-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6353187/ /pubmed/30699197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211407 Text en © 2019 Natsume et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Natsume, Makiko
Tanaka, Yoshihiro
Kappers, Astrid M. L.
Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures
title Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures
title_full Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures
title_fullStr Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures
title_short Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures
title_sort individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6353187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30699197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211407
work_keys_str_mv AT natsumemakiko individualdifferencesincognitiveprocessingforroughnessratingoffineandcoarsetextures
AT tanakayoshihiro individualdifferencesincognitiveprocessingforroughnessratingoffineandcoarsetextures
AT kappersastridml individualdifferencesincognitiveprocessingforroughnessratingoffineandcoarsetextures