Cargando…

Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a widely adopted tool for quality control and quality improvement in health care, which has increasingly been employed for general practice. However, there is lack of knowledge of how accreditation is received and experienced by health professionals in general practice....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Due, Tina Drud, Thorsen, Thorkil, Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0910-2
_version_ 1783391170334818304
author Due, Tina Drud
Thorsen, Thorkil
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
author_facet Due, Tina Drud
Thorsen, Thorkil
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
author_sort Due, Tina Drud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a widely adopted tool for quality control and quality improvement in health care, which has increasingly been employed for general practice. However, there is lack of knowledge of how accreditation is received and experienced by health professionals in general practice. This study explores how general practitioners (GPs) and their staff experienced the comprehensibility of accreditation standards and how they worked to increase their understanding of the standards. The study was conducted in Denmark where accreditation was mandatory in general practice from 2016 to 2018. METHODS: The study consists of qualitative interviews with general practitioners and staff from 11 general practices that were strategically sampled among practices set to receive their survey visit in 2017. Participants were interviewed twice; once during the preparation phase and once after the survey visit. GPs and staff were interviewed separately. The interviews were analysed inductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Understanding the requirements of the accreditation standards was a major challenge for the professionals when preparing for the accreditation survey visit. The participants attempted to increase their understanding of the standards in several ways including the use of regional support options and seeking out experts and colleagues. However, participants had mixed experiences with the various support options and many found the sense making work frustrating and time consuming. CONCLUSION: The results point to the importance of considering the level of specificity in accreditation standards and how to ensure an organisational set-up that can offer appropriate support to primary care clinics in terms of understanding what is required to meet the standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0910-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6354356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63543562019-02-06 Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study Due, Tina Drud Thorsen, Thorkil Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a widely adopted tool for quality control and quality improvement in health care, which has increasingly been employed for general practice. However, there is lack of knowledge of how accreditation is received and experienced by health professionals in general practice. This study explores how general practitioners (GPs) and their staff experienced the comprehensibility of accreditation standards and how they worked to increase their understanding of the standards. The study was conducted in Denmark where accreditation was mandatory in general practice from 2016 to 2018. METHODS: The study consists of qualitative interviews with general practitioners and staff from 11 general practices that were strategically sampled among practices set to receive their survey visit in 2017. Participants were interviewed twice; once during the preparation phase and once after the survey visit. GPs and staff were interviewed separately. The interviews were analysed inductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Understanding the requirements of the accreditation standards was a major challenge for the professionals when preparing for the accreditation survey visit. The participants attempted to increase their understanding of the standards in several ways including the use of regional support options and seeking out experts and colleagues. However, participants had mixed experiences with the various support options and many found the sense making work frustrating and time consuming. CONCLUSION: The results point to the importance of considering the level of specificity in accreditation standards and how to ensure an organisational set-up that can offer appropriate support to primary care clinics in terms of understanding what is required to meet the standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0910-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6354356/ /pubmed/30704399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0910-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Due, Tina Drud
Thorsen, Thorkil
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
title Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
title_full Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
title_short Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
title_sort understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0910-2
work_keys_str_mv AT duetinadrud understandingaccreditationstandardsingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT thorsenthorkil understandingaccreditationstandardsingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT kousgaardmariusbrostrøm understandingaccreditationstandardsingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy