Cargando…

People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos

PURPOSE: People with central vision loss (CVL) often report difficulties watching video. We objectively evaluated the ability to follow the story (using the information acquisition method). METHODS: Subjects with CVL (n = 23) or normal vision (NV, n = 60) described the content of 30-second video cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costela, Francisco M., Saunders, Daniel R., Rose, Dylan J., Katjezovic, Sidika, Reeves, Stephanie M., Woods, Russell L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30682208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25540
_version_ 1783391267120480256
author Costela, Francisco M.
Saunders, Daniel R.
Rose, Dylan J.
Katjezovic, Sidika
Reeves, Stephanie M.
Woods, Russell L.
author_facet Costela, Francisco M.
Saunders, Daniel R.
Rose, Dylan J.
Katjezovic, Sidika
Reeves, Stephanie M.
Woods, Russell L.
author_sort Costela, Francisco M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: People with central vision loss (CVL) often report difficulties watching video. We objectively evaluated the ability to follow the story (using the information acquisition method). METHODS: Subjects with CVL (n = 23) or normal vision (NV, n = 60) described the content of 30-second video clips from movies and documentaries. We derived an objective information acquisition (IA) score for each response using natural-language processing. To test whether the impact of CVL was simply due to reduced resolution, another group of NV subjects (n = 15) described video clips with defocus blur that reduced visual acuity to 20/50 to 20/800. Mixed models included random effects correcting for differences between subjects and between the clips, with age, gender, cognitive status, and education as covariates. RESULTS: Compared to both NV groups, IA scores were worse for the CVL group (P < 0.001). IA reduced with worsening visual acuity (P < 0.001), and the reduction with worsening visual acuity was greater for the CVL group than the NV-defocus group (P = 0.01), which was seen as a greater discrepancy at worse levels of visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: The IA method was able to detect difficulties in following the story experienced by people with CVL. Defocus blur failed to recreate the CVL experience. IA is likely to be useful for evaluations of the effects of vision rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6354940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63549402019-02-01 People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos Costela, Francisco M. Saunders, Daniel R. Rose, Dylan J. Katjezovic, Sidika Reeves, Stephanie M. Woods, Russell L. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Low Vision PURPOSE: People with central vision loss (CVL) often report difficulties watching video. We objectively evaluated the ability to follow the story (using the information acquisition method). METHODS: Subjects with CVL (n = 23) or normal vision (NV, n = 60) described the content of 30-second video clips from movies and documentaries. We derived an objective information acquisition (IA) score for each response using natural-language processing. To test whether the impact of CVL was simply due to reduced resolution, another group of NV subjects (n = 15) described video clips with defocus blur that reduced visual acuity to 20/50 to 20/800. Mixed models included random effects correcting for differences between subjects and between the clips, with age, gender, cognitive status, and education as covariates. RESULTS: Compared to both NV groups, IA scores were worse for the CVL group (P < 0.001). IA reduced with worsening visual acuity (P < 0.001), and the reduction with worsening visual acuity was greater for the CVL group than the NV-defocus group (P = 0.01), which was seen as a greater discrepancy at worse levels of visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: The IA method was able to detect difficulties in following the story experienced by people with CVL. Defocus blur failed to recreate the CVL experience. IA is likely to be useful for evaluations of the effects of vision rehabilitation. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6354940/ /pubmed/30682208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25540 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Low Vision
Costela, Francisco M.
Saunders, Daniel R.
Rose, Dylan J.
Katjezovic, Sidika
Reeves, Stephanie M.
Woods, Russell L.
People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos
title People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos
title_full People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos
title_fullStr People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos
title_full_unstemmed People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos
title_short People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos
title_sort people with central vision loss have difficulty watching videos
topic Low Vision
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30682208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25540
work_keys_str_mv AT costelafranciscom peoplewithcentralvisionlosshavedifficultywatchingvideos
AT saundersdanielr peoplewithcentralvisionlosshavedifficultywatchingvideos
AT rosedylanj peoplewithcentralvisionlosshavedifficultywatchingvideos
AT katjezovicsidika peoplewithcentralvisionlosshavedifficultywatchingvideos
AT reevesstephaniem peoplewithcentralvisionlosshavedifficultywatchingvideos
AT woodsrusselll peoplewithcentralvisionlosshavedifficultywatchingvideos