Cargando…

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery (OS) for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones based on published literatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Cochrane Library wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yiwen, Feng, Jianhua, Duan, Haifeng, Yue, Youwei, Zhang, Chaofeng, Deng, Tuo, Zeng, Guohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206810
_version_ 1783391273989701632
author Chen, Yiwen
Feng, Jianhua
Duan, Haifeng
Yue, Youwei
Zhang, Chaofeng
Deng, Tuo
Zeng, Guohua
author_facet Chen, Yiwen
Feng, Jianhua
Duan, Haifeng
Yue, Youwei
Zhang, Chaofeng
Deng, Tuo
Zeng, Guohua
author_sort Chen, Yiwen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery (OS) for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones based on published literatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing outcomes of PCNL and OS for treating patients with staghorn stones up to Jan 2018. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in final-SFR between PCNL and OS (odds ratio[OR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.61), while PCNL provided a significantly lower immediate-SFR compared with OS (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51; P < 0.0001). PCNL provided significantly lower overall complication rate, shorter operative times, hospitalization times, less blood loss and blood transfusion compared with OS (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84; P = 0.004), (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -59.01mins; 95% CI: -81.09, -36.93; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -5.77days; 95% CI: -7.80, -3.74; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -138.29ml; 95% CI: -244.98, -31.6; p = 0.01) and (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.68; P = 0.00002), respectively. No significant differences were found in minor complications (Clavien I-II) (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.09; p = 0.12) and major complications (Clavien III-V) (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.08; P = 0.08). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences for overall complications and operative times between mini-PCNL and OS. In sensitivity analysis, there was no significant difference for overall complications between PCNL and OS. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggested that standard PCNL turns out to be a safe and feasible alternative for patients with staghorn stones compared to OS or mini-PCNL. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample, prospective, multi-centric and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6354961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63549612019-02-15 Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Yiwen Feng, Jianhua Duan, Haifeng Yue, Youwei Zhang, Chaofeng Deng, Tuo Zeng, Guohua PLoS One Overview OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery (OS) for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones based on published literatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing outcomes of PCNL and OS for treating patients with staghorn stones up to Jan 2018. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in final-SFR between PCNL and OS (odds ratio[OR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.61), while PCNL provided a significantly lower immediate-SFR compared with OS (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51; P < 0.0001). PCNL provided significantly lower overall complication rate, shorter operative times, hospitalization times, less blood loss and blood transfusion compared with OS (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84; P = 0.004), (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -59.01mins; 95% CI: -81.09, -36.93; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -5.77days; 95% CI: -7.80, -3.74; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -138.29ml; 95% CI: -244.98, -31.6; p = 0.01) and (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.68; P = 0.00002), respectively. No significant differences were found in minor complications (Clavien I-II) (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.09; p = 0.12) and major complications (Clavien III-V) (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.08; P = 0.08). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences for overall complications and operative times between mini-PCNL and OS. In sensitivity analysis, there was no significant difference for overall complications between PCNL and OS. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggested that standard PCNL turns out to be a safe and feasible alternative for patients with staghorn stones compared to OS or mini-PCNL. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample, prospective, multi-centric and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings. Public Library of Science 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6354961/ /pubmed/30703102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206810 Text en © 2019 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Overview
Chen, Yiwen
Feng, Jianhua
Duan, Haifeng
Yue, Youwei
Zhang, Chaofeng
Deng, Tuo
Zeng, Guohua
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Overview
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206810
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyiwen percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengjianhua percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duanhaifeng percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yueyouwei percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangchaofeng percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dengtuo percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zengguohua percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis