Cargando…
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery (OS) for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones based on published literatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Cochrane Library wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206810 |
_version_ | 1783391273989701632 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yiwen Feng, Jianhua Duan, Haifeng Yue, Youwei Zhang, Chaofeng Deng, Tuo Zeng, Guohua |
author_facet | Chen, Yiwen Feng, Jianhua Duan, Haifeng Yue, Youwei Zhang, Chaofeng Deng, Tuo Zeng, Guohua |
author_sort | Chen, Yiwen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery (OS) for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones based on published literatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing outcomes of PCNL and OS for treating patients with staghorn stones up to Jan 2018. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in final-SFR between PCNL and OS (odds ratio[OR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.61), while PCNL provided a significantly lower immediate-SFR compared with OS (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51; P < 0.0001). PCNL provided significantly lower overall complication rate, shorter operative times, hospitalization times, less blood loss and blood transfusion compared with OS (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84; P = 0.004), (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -59.01mins; 95% CI: -81.09, -36.93; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -5.77days; 95% CI: -7.80, -3.74; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -138.29ml; 95% CI: -244.98, -31.6; p = 0.01) and (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.68; P = 0.00002), respectively. No significant differences were found in minor complications (Clavien I-II) (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.09; p = 0.12) and major complications (Clavien III-V) (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.08; P = 0.08). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences for overall complications and operative times between mini-PCNL and OS. In sensitivity analysis, there was no significant difference for overall complications between PCNL and OS. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggested that standard PCNL turns out to be a safe and feasible alternative for patients with staghorn stones compared to OS or mini-PCNL. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample, prospective, multi-centric and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6354961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63549612019-02-15 Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Yiwen Feng, Jianhua Duan, Haifeng Yue, Youwei Zhang, Chaofeng Deng, Tuo Zeng, Guohua PLoS One Overview OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery (OS) for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones based on published literatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing outcomes of PCNL and OS for treating patients with staghorn stones up to Jan 2018. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in final-SFR between PCNL and OS (odds ratio[OR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.61), while PCNL provided a significantly lower immediate-SFR compared with OS (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51; P < 0.0001). PCNL provided significantly lower overall complication rate, shorter operative times, hospitalization times, less blood loss and blood transfusion compared with OS (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84; P = 0.004), (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -59.01mins; 95% CI: -81.09, -36.93; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -5.77days; 95% CI: -7.80, -3.74; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -138.29ml; 95% CI: -244.98, -31.6; p = 0.01) and (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.68; P = 0.00002), respectively. No significant differences were found in minor complications (Clavien I-II) (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.09; p = 0.12) and major complications (Clavien III-V) (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.08; P = 0.08). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences for overall complications and operative times between mini-PCNL and OS. In sensitivity analysis, there was no significant difference for overall complications between PCNL and OS. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggested that standard PCNL turns out to be a safe and feasible alternative for patients with staghorn stones compared to OS or mini-PCNL. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample, prospective, multi-centric and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings. Public Library of Science 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6354961/ /pubmed/30703102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206810 Text en © 2019 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Overview Chen, Yiwen Feng, Jianhua Duan, Haifeng Yue, Youwei Zhang, Chaofeng Deng, Tuo Zeng, Guohua Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Overview |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyiwen percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fengjianhua percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duanhaifeng percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yueyouwei percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangchaofeng percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dengtuo percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zengguohua percutaneousnephrolithotomyversusopensurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofpatientswithstaghornstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |