Cargando…
Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
BACKGROUND: Millions of people use a second language every day. Does this have an effect on their decision-making? Are decisions in a second language more deliberate? Two mechanisms have been proposed: reduced emotionality or increased deliberation. Most studies so far used problems where both mecha...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211428 |
_version_ | 1783391288839634944 |
---|---|
author | Jensen Mækelæ, Martin Pfuhl, Gerit |
author_facet | Jensen Mækelæ, Martin Pfuhl, Gerit |
author_sort | Jensen Mækelæ, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Millions of people use a second language every day. Does this have an effect on their decision-making? Are decisions in a second language more deliberate? Two mechanisms have been proposed: reduced emotionality or increased deliberation. Most studies so far used problems where both mechanisms could contribute to a foreign language effect. Here, we aimed to identify whether deliberate reasoning increases for problems that are devoid of any emotional connotation when using a second language or having to switch between native and second language. METHOD: We measured deliberate reasoning with items from the cognitive reflection test, ratio bias, a probability matching task, and base rate neglect items. We recruited over 500 participants from Norway and the Netherlands that had English as their second language. Participants were randomly assigned to either the native, switching or second language condition. We measured: number of correctly answered items–deliberate reasoning score, perceived effort, perceived accuracy or confidence, and language proficiency. RESULTS: Deliberate reasoning was not increased when using a second language or when having to switch between native and second language. All three groups performed equally well. Significant predictors of deliberate reasoning were age, gender, education, perceived effort, and confidence but not the language context. Participants with low English proficiency spent more time reading compared to more fluent speakers. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage of second language on deliberate reasoning in the absence of time pressure. Deliberation was not increased by providing items in a second language, but through the willingness to spend cognitive effort and time to read carefully. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6355010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63550102019-02-15 Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language Jensen Mækelæ, Martin Pfuhl, Gerit PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Millions of people use a second language every day. Does this have an effect on their decision-making? Are decisions in a second language more deliberate? Two mechanisms have been proposed: reduced emotionality or increased deliberation. Most studies so far used problems where both mechanisms could contribute to a foreign language effect. Here, we aimed to identify whether deliberate reasoning increases for problems that are devoid of any emotional connotation when using a second language or having to switch between native and second language. METHOD: We measured deliberate reasoning with items from the cognitive reflection test, ratio bias, a probability matching task, and base rate neglect items. We recruited over 500 participants from Norway and the Netherlands that had English as their second language. Participants were randomly assigned to either the native, switching or second language condition. We measured: number of correctly answered items–deliberate reasoning score, perceived effort, perceived accuracy or confidence, and language proficiency. RESULTS: Deliberate reasoning was not increased when using a second language or when having to switch between native and second language. All three groups performed equally well. Significant predictors of deliberate reasoning were age, gender, education, perceived effort, and confidence but not the language context. Participants with low English proficiency spent more time reading compared to more fluent speakers. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage of second language on deliberate reasoning in the absence of time pressure. Deliberation was not increased by providing items in a second language, but through the willingness to spend cognitive effort and time to read carefully. Public Library of Science 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6355010/ /pubmed/30703137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211428 Text en © 2019 Jensen Mækelæ, Pfuhl http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jensen Mækelæ, Martin Pfuhl, Gerit Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language |
title | Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language |
title_full | Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language |
title_fullStr | Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language |
title_full_unstemmed | Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language |
title_short | Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language |
title_sort | deliberate reasoning is not affected by language |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jensenmækelæmartin deliberatereasoningisnotaffectedbylanguage AT pfuhlgerit deliberatereasoningisnotaffectedbylanguage |