Cargando…

Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language

BACKGROUND: Millions of people use a second language every day. Does this have an effect on their decision-making? Are decisions in a second language more deliberate? Two mechanisms have been proposed: reduced emotionality or increased deliberation. Most studies so far used problems where both mecha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen Mækelæ, Martin, Pfuhl, Gerit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211428
_version_ 1783391288839634944
author Jensen Mækelæ, Martin
Pfuhl, Gerit
author_facet Jensen Mækelæ, Martin
Pfuhl, Gerit
author_sort Jensen Mækelæ, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Millions of people use a second language every day. Does this have an effect on their decision-making? Are decisions in a second language more deliberate? Two mechanisms have been proposed: reduced emotionality or increased deliberation. Most studies so far used problems where both mechanisms could contribute to a foreign language effect. Here, we aimed to identify whether deliberate reasoning increases for problems that are devoid of any emotional connotation when using a second language or having to switch between native and second language. METHOD: We measured deliberate reasoning with items from the cognitive reflection test, ratio bias, a probability matching task, and base rate neglect items. We recruited over 500 participants from Norway and the Netherlands that had English as their second language. Participants were randomly assigned to either the native, switching or second language condition. We measured: number of correctly answered items–deliberate reasoning score, perceived effort, perceived accuracy or confidence, and language proficiency. RESULTS: Deliberate reasoning was not increased when using a second language or when having to switch between native and second language. All three groups performed equally well. Significant predictors of deliberate reasoning were age, gender, education, perceived effort, and confidence but not the language context. Participants with low English proficiency spent more time reading compared to more fluent speakers. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage of second language on deliberate reasoning in the absence of time pressure. Deliberation was not increased by providing items in a second language, but through the willingness to spend cognitive effort and time to read carefully.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6355010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63550102019-02-15 Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language Jensen Mækelæ, Martin Pfuhl, Gerit PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Millions of people use a second language every day. Does this have an effect on their decision-making? Are decisions in a second language more deliberate? Two mechanisms have been proposed: reduced emotionality or increased deliberation. Most studies so far used problems where both mechanisms could contribute to a foreign language effect. Here, we aimed to identify whether deliberate reasoning increases for problems that are devoid of any emotional connotation when using a second language or having to switch between native and second language. METHOD: We measured deliberate reasoning with items from the cognitive reflection test, ratio bias, a probability matching task, and base rate neglect items. We recruited over 500 participants from Norway and the Netherlands that had English as their second language. Participants were randomly assigned to either the native, switching or second language condition. We measured: number of correctly answered items–deliberate reasoning score, perceived effort, perceived accuracy or confidence, and language proficiency. RESULTS: Deliberate reasoning was not increased when using a second language or when having to switch between native and second language. All three groups performed equally well. Significant predictors of deliberate reasoning were age, gender, education, perceived effort, and confidence but not the language context. Participants with low English proficiency spent more time reading compared to more fluent speakers. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage of second language on deliberate reasoning in the absence of time pressure. Deliberation was not increased by providing items in a second language, but through the willingness to spend cognitive effort and time to read carefully. Public Library of Science 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6355010/ /pubmed/30703137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211428 Text en © 2019 Jensen Mækelæ, Pfuhl http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jensen Mækelæ, Martin
Pfuhl, Gerit
Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
title Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
title_full Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
title_fullStr Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
title_full_unstemmed Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
title_short Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
title_sort deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211428
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenmækelæmartin deliberatereasoningisnotaffectedbylanguage
AT pfuhlgerit deliberatereasoningisnotaffectedbylanguage