Cargando…

Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report

Recently, rowing power has been shown to be a key determinant of rowing performance. However, rowing power testing can vary greatly, and is not standardized. Here we sought to evaluate rowing power over a 15 sec rowing test utilizing a stroke-by-stroke analysis before and after 4 weeks of training i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: EGAN-SHUTTLER, JULIAN D., EDMONDS, ROHAN, EDDY, CASSANDRA, O’NEILL, VERONICA, IVES, STEPHEN J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761208
_version_ 1783391300411719680
author EGAN-SHUTTLER, JULIAN D.
EDMONDS, ROHAN
EDDY, CASSANDRA
O’NEILL, VERONICA
IVES, STEPHEN J.
author_facet EGAN-SHUTTLER, JULIAN D.
EDMONDS, ROHAN
EDDY, CASSANDRA
O’NEILL, VERONICA
IVES, STEPHEN J.
author_sort EGAN-SHUTTLER, JULIAN D.
collection PubMed
description Recently, rowing power has been shown to be a key determinant of rowing performance. However, rowing power testing can vary greatly, and is not standardized. Here we sought to evaluate rowing power over a 15 sec rowing test utilizing a stroke-by-stroke analysis before and after 4 weeks of training in youth rowers. METHODS: 18 adolescent male rowers were assigned to complete either 4 weeks of plyometric training (PLYO, n=9), or steady state cycling (Control, n=9), for 30 minutes before on water training three days/week. Each group was matched for training volume. Peak power (PP) was assessed via a 15 sec maximal rowing ergometer test. Using the Ergdata mobile app, PP, peak force (PF), average force (AF), drive speed (DS), and stroke at which PP was achieved (PPstroke) were measured and recorded for later offline analysis. RESULTS: Before training PP, PF, AF and DS did not differ between groups. After training, PP trended towards a significant difference between groups PLYO and CON (569±75 v. 629±51 Watts, control v. PLYO, p=0.08). Stroke-by-stroke analysis indicated more power was produced over the test following training (p<0.05), but no group differences existed. There was also a trend towards PLYO achieving PP earlier in the test (7.7±0.9 to 6.9±0.9 strokes, p=0.08). Finally, DS during the test was significantly increased for PLYO after training (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This novel method of evaluating rowing power was able to detect changes in rowing power indices, providing coaches with a cost effective method of evaluating responses to rowing training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6355124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63551242019-02-11 Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report EGAN-SHUTTLER, JULIAN D. EDMONDS, ROHAN EDDY, CASSANDRA O’NEILL, VERONICA IVES, STEPHEN J. Int J Exerc Sci Technical Note Recently, rowing power has been shown to be a key determinant of rowing performance. However, rowing power testing can vary greatly, and is not standardized. Here we sought to evaluate rowing power over a 15 sec rowing test utilizing a stroke-by-stroke analysis before and after 4 weeks of training in youth rowers. METHODS: 18 adolescent male rowers were assigned to complete either 4 weeks of plyometric training (PLYO, n=9), or steady state cycling (Control, n=9), for 30 minutes before on water training three days/week. Each group was matched for training volume. Peak power (PP) was assessed via a 15 sec maximal rowing ergometer test. Using the Ergdata mobile app, PP, peak force (PF), average force (AF), drive speed (DS), and stroke at which PP was achieved (PPstroke) were measured and recorded for later offline analysis. RESULTS: Before training PP, PF, AF and DS did not differ between groups. After training, PP trended towards a significant difference between groups PLYO and CON (569±75 v. 629±51 Watts, control v. PLYO, p=0.08). Stroke-by-stroke analysis indicated more power was produced over the test following training (p<0.05), but no group differences existed. There was also a trend towards PLYO achieving PP earlier in the test (7.7±0.9 to 6.9±0.9 strokes, p=0.08). Finally, DS during the test was significantly increased for PLYO after training (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This novel method of evaluating rowing power was able to detect changes in rowing power indices, providing coaches with a cost effective method of evaluating responses to rowing training. Berkeley Electronic Press 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6355124/ /pubmed/30761208 Text en
spellingShingle Technical Note
EGAN-SHUTTLER, JULIAN D.
EDMONDS, ROHAN
EDDY, CASSANDRA
O’NEILL, VERONICA
IVES, STEPHEN J.
Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report
title Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report
title_full Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report
title_fullStr Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report
title_short Beyond Peak, a Simple Approach to Assess Rowing Power and the Impact of Training: A Technical Report
title_sort beyond peak, a simple approach to assess rowing power and the impact of training: a technical report
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761208
work_keys_str_mv AT eganshuttlerjuliand beyondpeakasimpleapproachtoassessrowingpowerandtheimpactoftrainingatechnicalreport
AT edmondsrohan beyondpeakasimpleapproachtoassessrowingpowerandtheimpactoftrainingatechnicalreport
AT eddycassandra beyondpeakasimpleapproachtoassessrowingpowerandtheimpactoftrainingatechnicalreport
AT oneillveronica beyondpeakasimpleapproachtoassessrowingpowerandtheimpactoftrainingatechnicalreport
AT ivesstephenj beyondpeakasimpleapproachtoassessrowingpowerandtheimpactoftrainingatechnicalreport