Cargando…

The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study

Ankle braces have been hypothesized to prevent ankle injuries by restricting range of motion (ROM) and improving proprioception at the ankle. As such, ankle braces are commonly worn by physically active individuals to prevent ankle injuries. Despite their widespread use, the effects that ankle brace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HENDERSON, ZACHARIAH J., SANZO, PAOLO, ZERPA, CARLOS, KIVI, DEREK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761189
_version_ 1783391302513065984
author HENDERSON, ZACHARIAH J.
SANZO, PAOLO
ZERPA, CARLOS
KIVI, DEREK
author_facet HENDERSON, ZACHARIAH J.
SANZO, PAOLO
ZERPA, CARLOS
KIVI, DEREK
author_sort HENDERSON, ZACHARIAH J.
collection PubMed
description Ankle braces have been hypothesized to prevent ankle injuries by restricting range of motion (ROM) and improving proprioception at the ankle. As such, ankle braces are commonly worn by physically active individuals to prevent ankle injuries. Despite their widespread use, the effects that ankle braces have on athletic performance measures, such as vertical jumping, remains unclear. Furthermore, although ankle braces are known to restrict normal ROM at the ankle, little is known about the effects that ankle braces have on the lower extremity proximal to the ankle, specifically muscular activation. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study was to determine if lower extremity surface electromyographic activity (sEMG) and performance was affected in 5 males and 5 females by wearing softshell (AE) and semi-rigid (T1) ankle braces during a Vertical Jump Test, and to establish a basis for future investigation. Vertical jump height was not significantly affected (p > .05) in the AE (37.49 ± 11.61 cm) and T1 (36.3 ± 11.77 cm) ankle brace conditions, relative to the no brace (38.17 ± 12.01 cm) condition. No significant differences in sEMG of the lateral gastrocnemius and biceps femoris were present across conditions. There was a tendency for sEMG of the rectus femoris to decrease when wearing AE (195.71 ± 100.43 %MVC) and T1 (183.308 ± 92.73 %MVC) braces, compared to no braces (210.08 ± 127.46 %MVC), and warrants further investigation using a larger sample. Until more research is conducted, however, clinicians should not be concerned about ankle braces significantly affecting proximal muscle activation during vertical jumping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6355133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63551332019-02-11 The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study HENDERSON, ZACHARIAH J. SANZO, PAOLO ZERPA, CARLOS KIVI, DEREK Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Ankle braces have been hypothesized to prevent ankle injuries by restricting range of motion (ROM) and improving proprioception at the ankle. As such, ankle braces are commonly worn by physically active individuals to prevent ankle injuries. Despite their widespread use, the effects that ankle braces have on athletic performance measures, such as vertical jumping, remains unclear. Furthermore, although ankle braces are known to restrict normal ROM at the ankle, little is known about the effects that ankle braces have on the lower extremity proximal to the ankle, specifically muscular activation. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study was to determine if lower extremity surface electromyographic activity (sEMG) and performance was affected in 5 males and 5 females by wearing softshell (AE) and semi-rigid (T1) ankle braces during a Vertical Jump Test, and to establish a basis for future investigation. Vertical jump height was not significantly affected (p > .05) in the AE (37.49 ± 11.61 cm) and T1 (36.3 ± 11.77 cm) ankle brace conditions, relative to the no brace (38.17 ± 12.01 cm) condition. No significant differences in sEMG of the lateral gastrocnemius and biceps femoris were present across conditions. There was a tendency for sEMG of the rectus femoris to decrease when wearing AE (195.71 ± 100.43 %MVC) and T1 (183.308 ± 92.73 %MVC) braces, compared to no braces (210.08 ± 127.46 %MVC), and warrants further investigation using a larger sample. Until more research is conducted, however, clinicians should not be concerned about ankle braces significantly affecting proximal muscle activation during vertical jumping. Berkeley Electronic Press 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6355133/ /pubmed/30761189 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
HENDERSON, ZACHARIAH J.
SANZO, PAOLO
ZERPA, CARLOS
KIVI, DEREK
The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study
title The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study
title_full The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study
title_short The Effects of Ankle Braces on Lower Extremity Electromyography and Performance During Vertical Jumping: A Pilot Study
title_sort effects of ankle braces on lower extremity electromyography and performance during vertical jumping: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761189
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonzachariahj theeffectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy
AT sanzopaolo theeffectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy
AT zerpacarlos theeffectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy
AT kividerek theeffectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy
AT hendersonzachariahj effectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy
AT sanzopaolo effectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy
AT zerpacarlos effectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy
AT kividerek effectsofanklebracesonlowerextremityelectromyographyandperformanceduringverticaljumpingapilotstudy