Cargando…
The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
The last two decades have provided an astounding amount of novel information about the human genome. Translating germline genomic data into clinically actionable findings is reliant on the annotation and laboratory classification of specific variants. Variant classification helps providers and patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728895 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26501 |
_version_ | 1783391308026478592 |
---|---|
author | Slavin, Thomas P. Manjarrez, Sophia Pritchard, Colin C. Gray, Stacy Weitzel, Jeffrey N. |
author_facet | Slavin, Thomas P. Manjarrez, Sophia Pritchard, Colin C. Gray, Stacy Weitzel, Jeffrey N. |
author_sort | Slavin, Thomas P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The last two decades have provided an astounding amount of novel information about the human genome. Translating germline genomic data into clinically actionable findings is reliant on the annotation and laboratory classification of specific variants. Variant classification helps providers and patients determine if genomic findings can inform clinical management. In germline hereditary cancer predisposition testing, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are routinely misunderstood. By definition, they cannot be classified by the testing laboratory as either problematic mutations or benign variants. Many VUS undergo category reclassifications over time (from months to years after initial classification) as more information is known about normal human genomic diversity, especially among underrepresented minority populations. When VUS are reclassified, it has been shown that they are often downgraded. Likewise, some variants originally thought to be actionable mutations are downgraded to VUS or benign variants. Rarely but importantly, VUS may be reclassified in a manner that increases their initial clinical significance. Here, we discuss the insights gained from the study of variant reclassification. We provide a case series to highlight the potential impact that variant reclassifications can have on individual and family cancer management, risk counseling, and screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6355179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63551792019-02-06 The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care Slavin, Thomas P. Manjarrez, Sophia Pritchard, Colin C. Gray, Stacy Weitzel, Jeffrey N. Oncotarget Research Perspective The last two decades have provided an astounding amount of novel information about the human genome. Translating germline genomic data into clinically actionable findings is reliant on the annotation and laboratory classification of specific variants. Variant classification helps providers and patients determine if genomic findings can inform clinical management. In germline hereditary cancer predisposition testing, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are routinely misunderstood. By definition, they cannot be classified by the testing laboratory as either problematic mutations or benign variants. Many VUS undergo category reclassifications over time (from months to years after initial classification) as more information is known about normal human genomic diversity, especially among underrepresented minority populations. When VUS are reclassified, it has been shown that they are often downgraded. Likewise, some variants originally thought to be actionable mutations are downgraded to VUS or benign variants. Rarely but importantly, VUS may be reclassified in a manner that increases their initial clinical significance. Here, we discuss the insights gained from the study of variant reclassification. We provide a case series to highlight the potential impact that variant reclassifications can have on individual and family cancer management, risk counseling, and screening. Impact Journals LLC 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6355179/ /pubmed/30728895 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26501 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Slavin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Perspective Slavin, Thomas P. Manjarrez, Sophia Pritchard, Colin C. Gray, Stacy Weitzel, Jeffrey N. The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care |
title | The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care |
title_full | The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care |
title_fullStr | The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care |
title_short | The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care |
title_sort | effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care |
topic | Research Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728895 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slavinthomasp theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT manjarrezsophia theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT pritchardcolinc theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT graystacy theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT weitzeljeffreyn theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT slavinthomasp effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT manjarrezsophia effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT pritchardcolinc effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT graystacy effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare AT weitzeljeffreyn effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare |