Cargando…

The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care

The last two decades have provided an astounding amount of novel information about the human genome. Translating germline genomic data into clinically actionable findings is reliant on the annotation and laboratory classification of specific variants. Variant classification helps providers and patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slavin, Thomas P., Manjarrez, Sophia, Pritchard, Colin C., Gray, Stacy, Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728895
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26501
_version_ 1783391308026478592
author Slavin, Thomas P.
Manjarrez, Sophia
Pritchard, Colin C.
Gray, Stacy
Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
author_facet Slavin, Thomas P.
Manjarrez, Sophia
Pritchard, Colin C.
Gray, Stacy
Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
author_sort Slavin, Thomas P.
collection PubMed
description The last two decades have provided an astounding amount of novel information about the human genome. Translating germline genomic data into clinically actionable findings is reliant on the annotation and laboratory classification of specific variants. Variant classification helps providers and patients determine if genomic findings can inform clinical management. In germline hereditary cancer predisposition testing, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are routinely misunderstood. By definition, they cannot be classified by the testing laboratory as either problematic mutations or benign variants. Many VUS undergo category reclassifications over time (from months to years after initial classification) as more information is known about normal human genomic diversity, especially among underrepresented minority populations. When VUS are reclassified, it has been shown that they are often downgraded. Likewise, some variants originally thought to be actionable mutations are downgraded to VUS or benign variants. Rarely but importantly, VUS may be reclassified in a manner that increases their initial clinical significance. Here, we discuss the insights gained from the study of variant reclassification. We provide a case series to highlight the potential impact that variant reclassifications can have on individual and family cancer management, risk counseling, and screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6355179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63551792019-02-06 The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care Slavin, Thomas P. Manjarrez, Sophia Pritchard, Colin C. Gray, Stacy Weitzel, Jeffrey N. Oncotarget Research Perspective The last two decades have provided an astounding amount of novel information about the human genome. Translating germline genomic data into clinically actionable findings is reliant on the annotation and laboratory classification of specific variants. Variant classification helps providers and patients determine if genomic findings can inform clinical management. In germline hereditary cancer predisposition testing, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are routinely misunderstood. By definition, they cannot be classified by the testing laboratory as either problematic mutations or benign variants. Many VUS undergo category reclassifications over time (from months to years after initial classification) as more information is known about normal human genomic diversity, especially among underrepresented minority populations. When VUS are reclassified, it has been shown that they are often downgraded. Likewise, some variants originally thought to be actionable mutations are downgraded to VUS or benign variants. Rarely but importantly, VUS may be reclassified in a manner that increases their initial clinical significance. Here, we discuss the insights gained from the study of variant reclassification. We provide a case series to highlight the potential impact that variant reclassifications can have on individual and family cancer management, risk counseling, and screening. Impact Journals LLC 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6355179/ /pubmed/30728895 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26501 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Slavin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Perspective
Slavin, Thomas P.
Manjarrez, Sophia
Pritchard, Colin C.
Gray, Stacy
Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
title The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
title_full The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
title_fullStr The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
title_full_unstemmed The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
title_short The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
title_sort effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care
topic Research Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728895
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26501
work_keys_str_mv AT slavinthomasp theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT manjarrezsophia theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT pritchardcolinc theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT graystacy theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT weitzeljeffreyn theeffectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT slavinthomasp effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT manjarrezsophia effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT pritchardcolinc effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT graystacy effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare
AT weitzeljeffreyn effectsofgenomicgermlinevariantreclassificationonclinicalcancercare