Cargando…

Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections

Rapid identification and susceptibility testing results are of importance for the early appropriate therapy of bloodstream infections. The ePlex (GenMark Diagnostics) blood culture identification (BCID) panels are fully automated PCR-based assays designed to identify Gram-positive and Gram-negative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Te-Din, Melnik, Ekaterina, Bogaerts, Pierre, Evrard, Stephanie, Glupczynski, Youri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30487304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01597-18
_version_ 1783391345499439104
author Huang, Te-Din
Melnik, Ekaterina
Bogaerts, Pierre
Evrard, Stephanie
Glupczynski, Youri
author_facet Huang, Te-Din
Melnik, Ekaterina
Bogaerts, Pierre
Evrard, Stephanie
Glupczynski, Youri
author_sort Huang, Te-Din
collection PubMed
description Rapid identification and susceptibility testing results are of importance for the early appropriate therapy of bloodstream infections. The ePlex (GenMark Diagnostics) blood culture identification (BCID) panels are fully automated PCR-based assays designed to identify Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and bacterial resistance genes within 1.5 h from positive blood culture. Consecutive non-duplicate positive blood culture episodes were tested by the ePlex system prospectively. The choice of panel(s) (Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and/or fungal pathogens) was defined by Gram-stained microscopy of blood culture-positive bottles (BacT/Alert; bioMérieux). Results with the ePlex panels were compared to the identification results obtained by standard culture-based workflow. In total, 216 positive blood culture episodes were evaluable, yielding 263 identification results. The sensitivity/positive predictive value for detection by the ePlex panels of targeted cultured isolates were 97% and 99% for the Gram-positive panel and 99% and 96% for the Gram-negative panel, resulting in overall agreement rates of 96% and 94% for the Gram-positive and Gram-negative panel, respectively. All 26 samples with targeted resistance results were correctly detected by the ePlex panels. The ePlex panels provided highly accurate results and proved to be an excellent diagnostic tool for the rapid identification of pathogens causing bloodstream infections. The short time to results may be of added value for optimizing the clinical management of patients with sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6355516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63555162019-02-01 Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections Huang, Te-Din Melnik, Ekaterina Bogaerts, Pierre Evrard, Stephanie Glupczynski, Youri J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology Rapid identification and susceptibility testing results are of importance for the early appropriate therapy of bloodstream infections. The ePlex (GenMark Diagnostics) blood culture identification (BCID) panels are fully automated PCR-based assays designed to identify Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and bacterial resistance genes within 1.5 h from positive blood culture. Consecutive non-duplicate positive blood culture episodes were tested by the ePlex system prospectively. The choice of panel(s) (Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and/or fungal pathogens) was defined by Gram-stained microscopy of blood culture-positive bottles (BacT/Alert; bioMérieux). Results with the ePlex panels were compared to the identification results obtained by standard culture-based workflow. In total, 216 positive blood culture episodes were evaluable, yielding 263 identification results. The sensitivity/positive predictive value for detection by the ePlex panels of targeted cultured isolates were 97% and 99% for the Gram-positive panel and 99% and 96% for the Gram-negative panel, resulting in overall agreement rates of 96% and 94% for the Gram-positive and Gram-negative panel, respectively. All 26 samples with targeted resistance results were correctly detected by the ePlex panels. The ePlex panels provided highly accurate results and proved to be an excellent diagnostic tool for the rapid identification of pathogens causing bloodstream infections. The short time to results may be of added value for optimizing the clinical management of patients with sepsis. American Society for Microbiology 2019-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6355516/ /pubmed/30487304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01597-18 Text en Copyright © 2019 Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Bacteriology
Huang, Te-Din
Melnik, Ekaterina
Bogaerts, Pierre
Evrard, Stephanie
Glupczynski, Youri
Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
title Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
title_full Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
title_fullStr Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
title_short Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
title_sort evaluation of the eplex blood culture identification panels for detection of pathogens in bloodstream infections
topic Bacteriology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30487304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01597-18
work_keys_str_mv AT huangtedin evaluationoftheeplexbloodcultureidentificationpanelsfordetectionofpathogensinbloodstreaminfections
AT melnikekaterina evaluationoftheeplexbloodcultureidentificationpanelsfordetectionofpathogensinbloodstreaminfections
AT bogaertspierre evaluationoftheeplexbloodcultureidentificationpanelsfordetectionofpathogensinbloodstreaminfections
AT evrardstephanie evaluationoftheeplexbloodcultureidentificationpanelsfordetectionofpathogensinbloodstreaminfections
AT glupczynskiyouri evaluationoftheeplexbloodcultureidentificationpanelsfordetectionofpathogensinbloodstreaminfections