Cargando…
The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice
A paucity of data exists regarding sex differences in age‐related obesity and insulin resistance, particularly in the preclinical murine model. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of age and sex on insulin action and body composition in C57BL/6J mice. Aged (AG, 18 months old) male...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706674 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13995 |
_version_ | 1783391463559659520 |
---|---|
author | Reynolds, Thomas H. Dalton, Allison Calzini, Lucas Tuluca, Andrei Hoyte, Dakembay Ives, Stephen J. |
author_facet | Reynolds, Thomas H. Dalton, Allison Calzini, Lucas Tuluca, Andrei Hoyte, Dakembay Ives, Stephen J. |
author_sort | Reynolds, Thomas H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A paucity of data exists regarding sex differences in age‐related obesity and insulin resistance, particularly in the preclinical murine model. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of age and sex on insulin action and body composition in C57BL/6J mice. Aged (AG, 18 months old) male C57BL/6J mice, glucose tolerance was diminished compared to young (YG, 6 months old) male mice (Area Under Curve: 95,103 ± 6818 vs. 64,005 ± 2031, P = 0.002). However, there was no age‐related decline in glucose or insulin tolerance in females. Body composition analysis revealed that AG males had significantly greater body mass (42.2 ± 1.9 vs. 30.0 ± 0.4 g, P < 0.0001), fat mass (18.7 ± 2.0 vs. 3.3 ± 0.4 g, P < 0.0001), body fat (43.0 ± 3.0 vs. 11.0 ± 1.5%, P < 0.0001) than YG males. In AG females, body mass (32.8 ± 1.6 vs. 26.3 ± 0.9 g, P = 0.02) was higher, but fat mass (13.3 ± 2.0 vs. 9.5 ± 1.3 g, P = 0.24) and body fat (37.8 ± 4.8 vs. 35.5 ± 3.8%, P = 0.67) were similar when compared to YG females. AG males had significantly higher body mass (42.2 ± 1.9 vs. 32.8 ± 1.6 g, P = 0.001) and fat mass (18.7 ± 2.0 vs. 13.3 ± 2.0 g, P = 0.04) compared to AG females; however, body fat (43.0 ± 3.0 vs. 37.8 ± 4.8%, P = 0.28) was similar. Six weeks of treatment with MitoQ, a mitochondrial‐targeted antioxidant, did not reverse age‐related obesity in male mice. Surprisingly, obesity and insulin resistance appear to be reversed in the oldest of the old male mice (28 vs. 20 months). Our findings indicate that female mice, unlike males, are protected from age‐related obesity and insulin resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6356156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63561562019-02-08 The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice Reynolds, Thomas H. Dalton, Allison Calzini, Lucas Tuluca, Andrei Hoyte, Dakembay Ives, Stephen J. Physiol Rep Original Research A paucity of data exists regarding sex differences in age‐related obesity and insulin resistance, particularly in the preclinical murine model. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of age and sex on insulin action and body composition in C57BL/6J mice. Aged (AG, 18 months old) male C57BL/6J mice, glucose tolerance was diminished compared to young (YG, 6 months old) male mice (Area Under Curve: 95,103 ± 6818 vs. 64,005 ± 2031, P = 0.002). However, there was no age‐related decline in glucose or insulin tolerance in females. Body composition analysis revealed that AG males had significantly greater body mass (42.2 ± 1.9 vs. 30.0 ± 0.4 g, P < 0.0001), fat mass (18.7 ± 2.0 vs. 3.3 ± 0.4 g, P < 0.0001), body fat (43.0 ± 3.0 vs. 11.0 ± 1.5%, P < 0.0001) than YG males. In AG females, body mass (32.8 ± 1.6 vs. 26.3 ± 0.9 g, P = 0.02) was higher, but fat mass (13.3 ± 2.0 vs. 9.5 ± 1.3 g, P = 0.24) and body fat (37.8 ± 4.8 vs. 35.5 ± 3.8%, P = 0.67) were similar when compared to YG females. AG males had significantly higher body mass (42.2 ± 1.9 vs. 32.8 ± 1.6 g, P = 0.001) and fat mass (18.7 ± 2.0 vs. 13.3 ± 2.0 g, P = 0.04) compared to AG females; however, body fat (43.0 ± 3.0 vs. 37.8 ± 4.8%, P = 0.28) was similar. Six weeks of treatment with MitoQ, a mitochondrial‐targeted antioxidant, did not reverse age‐related obesity in male mice. Surprisingly, obesity and insulin resistance appear to be reversed in the oldest of the old male mice (28 vs. 20 months). Our findings indicate that female mice, unlike males, are protected from age‐related obesity and insulin resistance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6356156/ /pubmed/30706674 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13995 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Reynolds, Thomas H. Dalton, Allison Calzini, Lucas Tuluca, Andrei Hoyte, Dakembay Ives, Stephen J. The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice |
title | The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice |
title_full | The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice |
title_fullStr | The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice |
title_short | The impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in C57BL/6J mice |
title_sort | impact of age and sex on body composition and glucose sensitivity in c57bl/6j mice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706674 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reynoldsthomash theimpactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT daltonallison theimpactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT calzinilucas theimpactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT tulucaandrei theimpactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT hoytedakembay theimpactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT ivesstephenj theimpactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT reynoldsthomash impactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT daltonallison impactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT calzinilucas impactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT tulucaandrei impactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT hoytedakembay impactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice AT ivesstephenj impactofageandsexonbodycompositionandglucosesensitivityinc57bl6jmice |