Cargando…

The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis

BACKGROUND: Wikipedia, the multilingual encyclopedia, was founded in 2001 and is the world’s largest and most visited online general reference website. It is widely used by health care professionals and students. The inclusion of journal articles in Wikipedia is of scholarly interest, but the time t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jemielniak, Dariusz, Masukume, Gwinyai, Wilamowski, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30664451
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11429
_version_ 1783391472792371200
author Jemielniak, Dariusz
Masukume, Gwinyai
Wilamowski, Maciej
author_facet Jemielniak, Dariusz
Masukume, Gwinyai
Wilamowski, Maciej
author_sort Jemielniak, Dariusz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wikipedia, the multilingual encyclopedia, was founded in 2001 and is the world’s largest and most visited online general reference website. It is widely used by health care professionals and students. The inclusion of journal articles in Wikipedia is of scholarly interest, but the time taken for a journal article to be included in Wikipedia, from the moment of its publication to its incorporation into Wikipedia, is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the ranking of the most cited journals by their representation in the English-language medical pages of Wikipedia. In addition, we evaluated the number of days between publication of journal articles and their citation in Wikipedia medical pages, treating this measure as a proxy for the information-diffusion rate. METHODS: We retrieved the dates when articles were included in Wikipedia and the date of journal publication from Crossref by using an application programming interface. RESULTS: From 11,325 Wikipedia medical articles, we identified citations to 137,889 journal articles from over 15,000 journals. There was a large spike in the number of journal articles published in or after 2002 that were cited by Wikipedia. The higher the importance of a Wikipedia article, the higher was the mean number of journal citations it contained (top article, 48.13 [SD 33.67]; lowest article, 6.44 [SD 9.33]). However, the importance of the Wikipedia article did not affect the speed of reference addition. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was the most cited journal by Wikipedia, followed by The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet. The multidisciplinary journals Nature, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences were among the top 10 journals with the highest Wikipedia medical article citations. For the top biomedical journal papers cited in Wikipedia's medical pages in 2016-2017, it took about 90 days (3 months) for the citation to be used in Wikipedia. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of “recentism,” which refers to preferential citation of recently published journal articles in Wikipedia. Traditional high-impact medical and multidisciplinary journals were extensively cited by Wikipedia, suggesting that Wikipedia medical articles have robust underpinnings. In keeping with the Wikipedia policy of citing reviews/secondary sources in preference to primary sources, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was the most referenced journal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6356187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63561872019-02-22 The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis Jemielniak, Dariusz Masukume, Gwinyai Wilamowski, Maciej J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Wikipedia, the multilingual encyclopedia, was founded in 2001 and is the world’s largest and most visited online general reference website. It is widely used by health care professionals and students. The inclusion of journal articles in Wikipedia is of scholarly interest, but the time taken for a journal article to be included in Wikipedia, from the moment of its publication to its incorporation into Wikipedia, is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the ranking of the most cited journals by their representation in the English-language medical pages of Wikipedia. In addition, we evaluated the number of days between publication of journal articles and their citation in Wikipedia medical pages, treating this measure as a proxy for the information-diffusion rate. METHODS: We retrieved the dates when articles were included in Wikipedia and the date of journal publication from Crossref by using an application programming interface. RESULTS: From 11,325 Wikipedia medical articles, we identified citations to 137,889 journal articles from over 15,000 journals. There was a large spike in the number of journal articles published in or after 2002 that were cited by Wikipedia. The higher the importance of a Wikipedia article, the higher was the mean number of journal citations it contained (top article, 48.13 [SD 33.67]; lowest article, 6.44 [SD 9.33]). However, the importance of the Wikipedia article did not affect the speed of reference addition. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was the most cited journal by Wikipedia, followed by The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet. The multidisciplinary journals Nature, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences were among the top 10 journals with the highest Wikipedia medical article citations. For the top biomedical journal papers cited in Wikipedia's medical pages in 2016-2017, it took about 90 days (3 months) for the citation to be used in Wikipedia. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of “recentism,” which refers to preferential citation of recently published journal articles in Wikipedia. Traditional high-impact medical and multidisciplinary journals were extensively cited by Wikipedia, suggesting that Wikipedia medical articles have robust underpinnings. In keeping with the Wikipedia policy of citing reviews/secondary sources in preference to primary sources, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was the most referenced journal. JMIR Publications 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6356187/ /pubmed/30664451 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11429 Text en ©Dariusz Jemielniak, Gwinyai Masukume, Maciej Wilamowski. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.01.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jemielniak, Dariusz
Masukume, Gwinyai
Wilamowski, Maciej
The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis
title The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis
title_full The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis
title_fullStr The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis
title_short The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis
title_sort most influential medical journals according to wikipedia: quantitative analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30664451
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11429
work_keys_str_mv AT jemielniakdariusz themostinfluentialmedicaljournalsaccordingtowikipediaquantitativeanalysis
AT masukumegwinyai themostinfluentialmedicaljournalsaccordingtowikipediaquantitativeanalysis
AT wilamowskimaciej themostinfluentialmedicaljournalsaccordingtowikipediaquantitativeanalysis
AT jemielniakdariusz mostinfluentialmedicaljournalsaccordingtowikipediaquantitativeanalysis
AT masukumegwinyai mostinfluentialmedicaljournalsaccordingtowikipediaquantitativeanalysis
AT wilamowskimaciej mostinfluentialmedicaljournalsaccordingtowikipediaquantitativeanalysis