Cargando…

Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples

The Sodium Screener© (SS©), as developed by NutritionQuest (Berkeley, CA, USA), was designed to reduce the burden of repeated dietary or urinary sodium measurements, but the accuracy of daily sodium intake estimates has not been reported. Associations were examined between sodium intakes derived fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tangney, Christy C., Rasmussen, Heather E., Richards, Candace, Li, Michelle, Appelhans, Bradley M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11010166
_version_ 1783391633615618048
author Tangney, Christy C.
Rasmussen, Heather E.
Richards, Candace
Li, Michelle
Appelhans, Bradley M.
author_facet Tangney, Christy C.
Rasmussen, Heather E.
Richards, Candace
Li, Michelle
Appelhans, Bradley M.
author_sort Tangney, Christy C.
collection PubMed
description The Sodium Screener© (SS©), as developed by NutritionQuest (Berkeley, CA, USA), was designed to reduce the burden of repeated dietary or urinary sodium measurements, but the accuracy of daily sodium intake estimates has not been reported. Associations were examined between sodium intakes derived from the SS© scores and repeated 24-h recalls (24DR) in two studies with different administration modes. In one study, 102 registered dietitians (RD) completed three Automated Self-Administered 24DRs (ASA24©), version 2014, followed by the SS©; both were self-administered and web-based. In the second sample, (the Study of Household Purchasing Patterns, Eating, and Recreation or SHoPPER), trained dietitians conducted 24DR interviews with 69 community-dwelling adults in their homes; all the community adults then completed a paper-based SS© at the final visit. In the RD study, SS© -predicted sodium intakes were 2604 ± 990 (mean ± Standard deviation (SD)), and ASA24© sodium intakes were 3193 ± 907 mg/day. In the SHoPPER sample, corresponding values were 3338 ± 1310 mg/day and 2939 ± 1231 mg/day, respectively. SS©-predicted and recall sodium estimates were correlated in the RD study (r = 0.381, p = 0.0001) and in the SHoPPER (r = 0.430, p = 0.0002). Agreement between the SS© and 24-h recalls was poor when classifying individuals as meeting the dietary sodium guidelines of 2300 mg/day or not (RD study: kappa = 0.080, p = 0.32; SHoPPER: kappa = 0.207, p = 0.08). Based on repeated 24DR either in person or self-reported online as the criterion for estimating daily sodium intakes, the SS© may require additional modifications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6356775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63567752019-02-01 Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples Tangney, Christy C. Rasmussen, Heather E. Richards, Candace Li, Michelle Appelhans, Bradley M. Nutrients Article The Sodium Screener© (SS©), as developed by NutritionQuest (Berkeley, CA, USA), was designed to reduce the burden of repeated dietary or urinary sodium measurements, but the accuracy of daily sodium intake estimates has not been reported. Associations were examined between sodium intakes derived from the SS© scores and repeated 24-h recalls (24DR) in two studies with different administration modes. In one study, 102 registered dietitians (RD) completed three Automated Self-Administered 24DRs (ASA24©), version 2014, followed by the SS©; both were self-administered and web-based. In the second sample, (the Study of Household Purchasing Patterns, Eating, and Recreation or SHoPPER), trained dietitians conducted 24DR interviews with 69 community-dwelling adults in their homes; all the community adults then completed a paper-based SS© at the final visit. In the RD study, SS© -predicted sodium intakes were 2604 ± 990 (mean ± Standard deviation (SD)), and ASA24© sodium intakes were 3193 ± 907 mg/day. In the SHoPPER sample, corresponding values were 3338 ± 1310 mg/day and 2939 ± 1231 mg/day, respectively. SS©-predicted and recall sodium estimates were correlated in the RD study (r = 0.381, p = 0.0001) and in the SHoPPER (r = 0.430, p = 0.0002). Agreement between the SS© and 24-h recalls was poor when classifying individuals as meeting the dietary sodium guidelines of 2300 mg/day or not (RD study: kappa = 0.080, p = 0.32; SHoPPER: kappa = 0.207, p = 0.08). Based on repeated 24DR either in person or self-reported online as the criterion for estimating daily sodium intakes, the SS© may require additional modifications. MDPI 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6356775/ /pubmed/30646541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11010166 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tangney, Christy C.
Rasmussen, Heather E.
Richards, Candace
Li, Michelle
Appelhans, Bradley M.
Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples
title Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples
title_full Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples
title_short Evaluation of a Brief Sodium Screener in Two Samples
title_sort evaluation of a brief sodium screener in two samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11010166
work_keys_str_mv AT tangneychristyc evaluationofabriefsodiumscreenerintwosamples
AT rasmussenheathere evaluationofabriefsodiumscreenerintwosamples
AT richardscandace evaluationofabriefsodiumscreenerintwosamples
AT limichelle evaluationofabriefsodiumscreenerintwosamples
AT appelhansbradleym evaluationofabriefsodiumscreenerintwosamples