Cargando…
Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography
Since the 1940s electrocorticography (ECoG) devices and, more recently, in the last decade, micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) cortical electrode arrays were used for a wide set of experimental and clinical applications, such as epilepsy localization and brain–computer interface (BCI) technologies....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10010062 |
_version_ | 1783391650923413504 |
---|---|
author | Shokoueinejad, Mehdi Park, Dong-Wook Jung, Yei Hwan Brodnick, Sarah K. Novello, Joseph Dingle, Aaron Swanson, Kyle I. Baek, Dong-Hyun Suminski, Aaron J. Lake, Wendell B. Ma, Zhenqiang Williams, Justin |
author_facet | Shokoueinejad, Mehdi Park, Dong-Wook Jung, Yei Hwan Brodnick, Sarah K. Novello, Joseph Dingle, Aaron Swanson, Kyle I. Baek, Dong-Hyun Suminski, Aaron J. Lake, Wendell B. Ma, Zhenqiang Williams, Justin |
author_sort | Shokoueinejad, Mehdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the 1940s electrocorticography (ECoG) devices and, more recently, in the last decade, micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) cortical electrode arrays were used for a wide set of experimental and clinical applications, such as epilepsy localization and brain–computer interface (BCI) technologies. Miniaturized implantable µECoG devices have the advantage of providing greater-density neural signal acquisition and stimulation capabilities in a minimally invasive fashion. An increased spatial resolution of the µECoG array will be useful for greater specificity diagnosis and treatment of neuronal diseases and the advancement of basic neuroscience and BCI research. In this review, recent achievements of ECoG and µECoG are discussed. The electrode configurations and varying material choices used to design µECoG arrays are discussed, including advantages and disadvantages of µECoG technology compared to electroencephalography (EEG), ECoG, and intracortical electrode arrays. Electrode materials that are the primary focus include platinum, iridium oxide, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), indium tin oxide (ITO), and graphene. We discuss the biological immune response to µECoG devices compared to other electrode array types, the role of µECoG in clinical pathology, and brain–computer interface technology. The information presented in this review will be helpful to understand the current status, organize available knowledge, and guide future clinical and research applications of µECoG technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6356841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63568412019-02-05 Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography Shokoueinejad, Mehdi Park, Dong-Wook Jung, Yei Hwan Brodnick, Sarah K. Novello, Joseph Dingle, Aaron Swanson, Kyle I. Baek, Dong-Hyun Suminski, Aaron J. Lake, Wendell B. Ma, Zhenqiang Williams, Justin Micromachines (Basel) Review Since the 1940s electrocorticography (ECoG) devices and, more recently, in the last decade, micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) cortical electrode arrays were used for a wide set of experimental and clinical applications, such as epilepsy localization and brain–computer interface (BCI) technologies. Miniaturized implantable µECoG devices have the advantage of providing greater-density neural signal acquisition and stimulation capabilities in a minimally invasive fashion. An increased spatial resolution of the µECoG array will be useful for greater specificity diagnosis and treatment of neuronal diseases and the advancement of basic neuroscience and BCI research. In this review, recent achievements of ECoG and µECoG are discussed. The electrode configurations and varying material choices used to design µECoG arrays are discussed, including advantages and disadvantages of µECoG technology compared to electroencephalography (EEG), ECoG, and intracortical electrode arrays. Electrode materials that are the primary focus include platinum, iridium oxide, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), indium tin oxide (ITO), and graphene. We discuss the biological immune response to µECoG devices compared to other electrode array types, the role of µECoG in clinical pathology, and brain–computer interface technology. The information presented in this review will be helpful to understand the current status, organize available knowledge, and guide future clinical and research applications of µECoG technologies. MDPI 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6356841/ /pubmed/30658503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10010062 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Shokoueinejad, Mehdi Park, Dong-Wook Jung, Yei Hwan Brodnick, Sarah K. Novello, Joseph Dingle, Aaron Swanson, Kyle I. Baek, Dong-Hyun Suminski, Aaron J. Lake, Wendell B. Ma, Zhenqiang Williams, Justin Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography |
title | Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography |
title_full | Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography |
title_fullStr | Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography |
title_full_unstemmed | Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography |
title_short | Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography |
title_sort | progress in the field of micro-electrocorticography |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10010062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shokoueinejadmehdi progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT parkdongwook progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT jungyeihwan progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT brodnicksarahk progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT novellojoseph progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT dingleaaron progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT swansonkylei progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT baekdonghyun progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT suminskiaaronj progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT lakewendellb progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT mazhenqiang progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography AT williamsjustin progressinthefieldofmicroelectrocorticography |