Cargando…

In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize

Aspergillus flavus, the main aflatoxin B(1) producing fungal species, Fusarium graminearum, a deoxynivalenol producer, and the fumonisin-producing species F. proliferatum and F. verticillioides are the main toxigenic fungi (TF) that colonize maize. Several strategies are available to control TF and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masiello, Mario, Somma, Stefania, Ghionna, Veronica, Logrieco, Antonio Francesco, Moretti, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins11010011
_version_ 1783391726066466816
author Masiello, Mario
Somma, Stefania
Ghionna, Veronica
Logrieco, Antonio Francesco
Moretti, Antonio
author_facet Masiello, Mario
Somma, Stefania
Ghionna, Veronica
Logrieco, Antonio Francesco
Moretti, Antonio
author_sort Masiello, Mario
collection PubMed
description Aspergillus flavus, the main aflatoxin B(1) producing fungal species, Fusarium graminearum, a deoxynivalenol producer, and the fumonisin-producing species F. proliferatum and F. verticillioides are the main toxigenic fungi (TF) that colonize maize. Several strategies are available to control TF and related mycotoxins, such as chemical control. However, there is poor knowledge on the efficacy of fungicides on maize plants since few molecules are registered. The sensitivity of F. graminearum, F. proliferatum, F. verticillioides, and A. flavus to eleven fungicides, selected based on their different modes of action, was evaluated in both in vitro assays and, after selection, in the field. In vitro, demethylation inhibitors (DMI) showed excellent performances, followed by thiophanate-methyl and folpet. Among the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI), isopyrazam showed a higher effectiveness against Fusarium species than boscalid, which was ineffective against Fusarium, like the phenyl-pyrrole fludioxonil. Furthermore, both SDHIs and fludioxonil were more active against A. flavus than Fusarium species. In field trials, prothioconazole and thiophanate-methyl were confirmed to be effective to reduce F. graminearum (52% and 48%) and F. proliferatum contamination (44% and 27%). On the other hand, prothioconazole and boscalid could reduce A. flavus contamination at values of 75% and 56%, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6357132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63571322019-02-05 In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize Masiello, Mario Somma, Stefania Ghionna, Veronica Logrieco, Antonio Francesco Moretti, Antonio Toxins (Basel) Article Aspergillus flavus, the main aflatoxin B(1) producing fungal species, Fusarium graminearum, a deoxynivalenol producer, and the fumonisin-producing species F. proliferatum and F. verticillioides are the main toxigenic fungi (TF) that colonize maize. Several strategies are available to control TF and related mycotoxins, such as chemical control. However, there is poor knowledge on the efficacy of fungicides on maize plants since few molecules are registered. The sensitivity of F. graminearum, F. proliferatum, F. verticillioides, and A. flavus to eleven fungicides, selected based on their different modes of action, was evaluated in both in vitro assays and, after selection, in the field. In vitro, demethylation inhibitors (DMI) showed excellent performances, followed by thiophanate-methyl and folpet. Among the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI), isopyrazam showed a higher effectiveness against Fusarium species than boscalid, which was ineffective against Fusarium, like the phenyl-pyrrole fludioxonil. Furthermore, both SDHIs and fludioxonil were more active against A. flavus than Fusarium species. In field trials, prothioconazole and thiophanate-methyl were confirmed to be effective to reduce F. graminearum (52% and 48%) and F. proliferatum contamination (44% and 27%). On the other hand, prothioconazole and boscalid could reduce A. flavus contamination at values of 75% and 56%, respectively. MDPI 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6357132/ /pubmed/30609646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins11010011 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Masiello, Mario
Somma, Stefania
Ghionna, Veronica
Logrieco, Antonio Francesco
Moretti, Antonio
In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize
title In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize
title_full In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize
title_fullStr In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize
title_short In Vitro and in Field Response of Different Fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium Species Causing Ear Rot Disease of Maize
title_sort in vitro and in field response of different fungicides against aspergillus flavus and fusarium species causing ear rot disease of maize
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins11010011
work_keys_str_mv AT masiellomario invitroandinfieldresponseofdifferentfungicidesagainstaspergillusflavusandfusariumspeciescausingearrotdiseaseofmaize
AT sommastefania invitroandinfieldresponseofdifferentfungicidesagainstaspergillusflavusandfusariumspeciescausingearrotdiseaseofmaize
AT ghionnaveronica invitroandinfieldresponseofdifferentfungicidesagainstaspergillusflavusandfusariumspeciescausingearrotdiseaseofmaize
AT logriecoantoniofrancesco invitroandinfieldresponseofdifferentfungicidesagainstaspergillusflavusandfusariumspeciescausingearrotdiseaseofmaize
AT morettiantonio invitroandinfieldresponseofdifferentfungicidesagainstaspergillusflavusandfusariumspeciescausingearrotdiseaseofmaize