Cargando…

Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria

Taste hedonics is a well-documented driver of food consumption. The role of sweetness in directing ingestive behavior is largely rooted in biology. One can then intuit that individual differences in sweet-liking may constitute an indicator of variations in the susceptibility to diet-related health o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iatridi, Vasiliki, Hayes, John E., Yeomans, Martin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30634558
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11010129
_version_ 1783391739710537728
author Iatridi, Vasiliki
Hayes, John E.
Yeomans, Martin R.
author_facet Iatridi, Vasiliki
Hayes, John E.
Yeomans, Martin R.
author_sort Iatridi, Vasiliki
collection PubMed
description Taste hedonics is a well-documented driver of food consumption. The role of sweetness in directing ingestive behavior is largely rooted in biology. One can then intuit that individual differences in sweet-liking may constitute an indicator of variations in the susceptibility to diet-related health outcomes. Despite half a century of research on sweet-liking, the best method to identify the distinct responses to sweet taste is still debated. To help resolve this issue, liking and intensity ratings for eight sucrose solutions ranging from 0 to 1 M were collected from 148 young adults (29% men). Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) revealed three response patterns: a sweet-liker (SL) phenotype characterized by a rise in liking as concentration increased, an inverted U-shaped phenotype with maximum liking at 0.25 M, and a sweet-disliker (SD) phenotype characterized by a decline in liking as a function of concentration. Based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, present data suggest the clearest discrimination between phenotypes is seen with 1.0 M sucrose, where a liking rating between −15 and +15 on a −50/+50 scale reliably distinguished individuals with an inverted U-shaped response from the SLs and the SDs. If the efficacy of this approach is confirmed in other populations, the discrimination criteria identified here can serve as the basis for a standard method for classifying sweet taste liker phenotypes in adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6357166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63571662019-02-04 Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria Iatridi, Vasiliki Hayes, John E. Yeomans, Martin R. Nutrients Article Taste hedonics is a well-documented driver of food consumption. The role of sweetness in directing ingestive behavior is largely rooted in biology. One can then intuit that individual differences in sweet-liking may constitute an indicator of variations in the susceptibility to diet-related health outcomes. Despite half a century of research on sweet-liking, the best method to identify the distinct responses to sweet taste is still debated. To help resolve this issue, liking and intensity ratings for eight sucrose solutions ranging from 0 to 1 M were collected from 148 young adults (29% men). Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) revealed three response patterns: a sweet-liker (SL) phenotype characterized by a rise in liking as concentration increased, an inverted U-shaped phenotype with maximum liking at 0.25 M, and a sweet-disliker (SD) phenotype characterized by a decline in liking as a function of concentration. Based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, present data suggest the clearest discrimination between phenotypes is seen with 1.0 M sucrose, where a liking rating between −15 and +15 on a −50/+50 scale reliably distinguished individuals with an inverted U-shaped response from the SLs and the SDs. If the efficacy of this approach is confirmed in other populations, the discrimination criteria identified here can serve as the basis for a standard method for classifying sweet taste liker phenotypes in adults. MDPI 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6357166/ /pubmed/30634558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11010129 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Iatridi, Vasiliki
Hayes, John E.
Yeomans, Martin R.
Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria
title Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria
title_full Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria
title_fullStr Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria
title_short Quantifying Sweet Taste Liker Phenotypes: Time for Some Consistency in the Classification Criteria
title_sort quantifying sweet taste liker phenotypes: time for some consistency in the classification criteria
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30634558
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11010129
work_keys_str_mv AT iatridivasiliki quantifyingsweettastelikerphenotypestimeforsomeconsistencyintheclassificationcriteria
AT hayesjohne quantifyingsweettastelikerphenotypestimeforsomeconsistencyintheclassificationcriteria
AT yeomansmartinr quantifyingsweettastelikerphenotypestimeforsomeconsistencyintheclassificationcriteria