Cargando…

Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets

(1) Background: Quantification of platelet division is challenging because automated Coulter cell counters produce equivocal platelet counts. (2) Methods: We applied the flow cytometric cell tracking dye dilution assay as a popular immunological method to evaluate lymphocyte proliferation to prove a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyun-Jeong, Song, Yejin, Song, Jaewoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10010001
_version_ 1783391749050204160
author Kim, Hyun-Jeong
Song, Yejin
Song, Jaewoo
author_facet Kim, Hyun-Jeong
Song, Yejin
Song, Jaewoo
author_sort Kim, Hyun-Jeong
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Quantification of platelet division is challenging because automated Coulter cell counters produce equivocal platelet counts. (2) Methods: We applied the flow cytometric cell tracking dye dilution assay as a popular immunological method to evaluate lymphocyte proliferation to prove and quantitate platelet division. We also devised a method relying on platelet culture in a semisolid medium which enabled dividing platelets to be identified by limiting the diffusive movement of platelets. Mixing platelets of different labeling colors in semisolid medium and counting the platelet doublets of each color combination enabled us to prove and quantitate platelet division. (3) Results: The tracking dye dilution assay revealed that 75.5 to 85.6% of platelets were dividing after 20 hours in culture. Platelets labeled with two different tracking dyes were mixed and cultured in semisolid medium for differential doublet counting. We counted platelet singlets and doublets of each color and color combination using confocal microscopy after six hours of culture and compared the relative number of two-colored doublets with binomial prediction to prove platelet division (P < 0.01). Division was suppressed by taxol, nocodazole, or cytochalasin D treatment. We derived a formula for determining the fraction of dividing platelets using the numbers of singlets and doublets of each color and color combination. The platelet division fraction ranged from 8.8 to 17.5%. (4) Conclusion: We successfully measured platelet division using a simple biometric image analysis method with possible future application to microfluidic devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6357203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63572032019-02-05 Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets Kim, Hyun-Jeong Song, Yejin Song, Jaewoo Micromachines (Basel) Article (1) Background: Quantification of platelet division is challenging because automated Coulter cell counters produce equivocal platelet counts. (2) Methods: We applied the flow cytometric cell tracking dye dilution assay as a popular immunological method to evaluate lymphocyte proliferation to prove and quantitate platelet division. We also devised a method relying on platelet culture in a semisolid medium which enabled dividing platelets to be identified by limiting the diffusive movement of platelets. Mixing platelets of different labeling colors in semisolid medium and counting the platelet doublets of each color combination enabled us to prove and quantitate platelet division. (3) Results: The tracking dye dilution assay revealed that 75.5 to 85.6% of platelets were dividing after 20 hours in culture. Platelets labeled with two different tracking dyes were mixed and cultured in semisolid medium for differential doublet counting. We counted platelet singlets and doublets of each color and color combination using confocal microscopy after six hours of culture and compared the relative number of two-colored doublets with binomial prediction to prove platelet division (P < 0.01). Division was suppressed by taxol, nocodazole, or cytochalasin D treatment. We derived a formula for determining the fraction of dividing platelets using the numbers of singlets and doublets of each color and color combination. The platelet division fraction ranged from 8.8 to 17.5%. (4) Conclusion: We successfully measured platelet division using a simple biometric image analysis method with possible future application to microfluidic devices. MDPI 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6357203/ /pubmed/30577464 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10010001 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Hyun-Jeong
Song, Yejin
Song, Jaewoo
Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets
title Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets
title_full Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets
title_fullStr Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets
title_full_unstemmed Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets
title_short Biometric Image Analysis for Quantitation of Dividing Platelets
title_sort biometric image analysis for quantitation of dividing platelets
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10010001
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyunjeong biometricimageanalysisforquantitationofdividingplatelets
AT songyejin biometricimageanalysisforquantitationofdividingplatelets
AT songjaewoo biometricimageanalysisforquantitationofdividingplatelets