Cargando…
Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas
BACKGROUND: Prognostic signatures are vital to precision medicine. However, development of somatic mutation prognostic signatures for cancers remains a challenge. In this study we developed a novel method for discovering somatic mutation based prognostic signatures. RESULTS: Somatic mutation and cli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-018-0454-7 |
_version_ | 1783391769464930304 |
---|---|
author | Menor, Mark Zhu, Yong Wang, Yu Zhang, Jicai Jiang, Bin Deng, Youping |
author_facet | Menor, Mark Zhu, Yong Wang, Yu Zhang, Jicai Jiang, Bin Deng, Youping |
author_sort | Menor, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prognostic signatures are vital to precision medicine. However, development of somatic mutation prognostic signatures for cancers remains a challenge. In this study we developed a novel method for discovering somatic mutation based prognostic signatures. RESULTS: Somatic mutation and clinical data for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and colorectal adenocarcinoma (COAD) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were randomly divided into training (n = 328 for LUAD and 286 for COAD) and validation (n = 167 for LUAD and 141 for COAD) datasets. A novel method of using the log2 ratio of the tumor mutation frequency to the paired normal mutation frequency is computed for each patient and missense mutation. The missense mutation ratios were mean aggregated into gene-level somatic mutation profiles. The somatic mutations were assessed using univariate Cox analysis on the LUAD and COAD training sets separately. Stepwise multivariate Cox analysis resulted in a final gene prognostic signature for LUAD and COAD. Performance was compared to gene prognostic signatures generated using the same pipeline but with different somatic mutation profile representations based on tumor mutation frequency, binary calls, and gene-gene network normalization. Signature high-risk LUAD and COAD cases had worse overall survival compared to the signature low-risk cases in the validation set (log-rank test p-value = 0.0101 for LUAD and 0.0314 for COAD) using mutation tumor frequency ratio (MFR) profiles, while all other methods, including gene-gene network normalization, have statistically insignificant stratification (log-rank test p-value ≥0.05). Most of the genes in the final gene signatures using MFR profiles are cancer-related based on network and literature analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the robustness of MFR profiles and its potential to be a powerful prognostic tool in cancer. The results are robust according to validation testing and the selected genes are biologically relevant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6357362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63573622019-02-07 Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas Menor, Mark Zhu, Yong Wang, Yu Zhang, Jicai Jiang, Bin Deng, Youping BMC Med Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Prognostic signatures are vital to precision medicine. However, development of somatic mutation prognostic signatures for cancers remains a challenge. In this study we developed a novel method for discovering somatic mutation based prognostic signatures. RESULTS: Somatic mutation and clinical data for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and colorectal adenocarcinoma (COAD) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were randomly divided into training (n = 328 for LUAD and 286 for COAD) and validation (n = 167 for LUAD and 141 for COAD) datasets. A novel method of using the log2 ratio of the tumor mutation frequency to the paired normal mutation frequency is computed for each patient and missense mutation. The missense mutation ratios were mean aggregated into gene-level somatic mutation profiles. The somatic mutations were assessed using univariate Cox analysis on the LUAD and COAD training sets separately. Stepwise multivariate Cox analysis resulted in a final gene prognostic signature for LUAD and COAD. Performance was compared to gene prognostic signatures generated using the same pipeline but with different somatic mutation profile representations based on tumor mutation frequency, binary calls, and gene-gene network normalization. Signature high-risk LUAD and COAD cases had worse overall survival compared to the signature low-risk cases in the validation set (log-rank test p-value = 0.0101 for LUAD and 0.0314 for COAD) using mutation tumor frequency ratio (MFR) profiles, while all other methods, including gene-gene network normalization, have statistically insignificant stratification (log-rank test p-value ≥0.05). Most of the genes in the final gene signatures using MFR profiles are cancer-related based on network and literature analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the robustness of MFR profiles and its potential to be a powerful prognostic tool in cancer. The results are robust according to validation testing and the selected genes are biologically relevant. BioMed Central 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6357362/ /pubmed/30704450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-018-0454-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Menor, Mark Zhu, Yong Wang, Yu Zhang, Jicai Jiang, Bin Deng, Youping Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas |
title | Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas |
title_full | Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas |
title_fullStr | Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas |
title_short | Development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas |
title_sort | development of somatic mutation signatures for risk stratification and prognosis in lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-018-0454-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menormark developmentofsomaticmutationsignaturesforriskstratificationandprognosisinlungandcolorectaladenocarcinomas AT zhuyong developmentofsomaticmutationsignaturesforriskstratificationandprognosisinlungandcolorectaladenocarcinomas AT wangyu developmentofsomaticmutationsignaturesforriskstratificationandprognosisinlungandcolorectaladenocarcinomas AT zhangjicai developmentofsomaticmutationsignaturesforriskstratificationandprognosisinlungandcolorectaladenocarcinomas AT jiangbin developmentofsomaticmutationsignaturesforriskstratificationandprognosisinlungandcolorectaladenocarcinomas AT dengyouping developmentofsomaticmutationsignaturesforriskstratificationandprognosisinlungandcolorectaladenocarcinomas |