Cargando…
Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis
BACKGROUND: Although pain treatment is an important objective in prehospital emergency medicine the incidence of oligoanalgesia is still high in prehospital patients. Given that prehospital emergency medicine in Germany is open for physicians of any speciality, the prehospital pain treatment may dif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0683-0 |
_version_ | 1783391786935255040 |
---|---|
author | Schaller, Stefan J. Kappler, Felix P. Hofberger, Claudia Sattler, Jens Wagner, Richard Schneider, Gerhard Blobner, Manfred Kanz, Karl-Georg |
author_facet | Schaller, Stefan J. Kappler, Felix P. Hofberger, Claudia Sattler, Jens Wagner, Richard Schneider, Gerhard Blobner, Manfred Kanz, Karl-Georg |
author_sort | Schaller, Stefan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although pain treatment is an important objective in prehospital emergency medicine the incidence of oligoanalgesia is still high in prehospital patients. Given that prehospital emergency medicine in Germany is open for physicians of any speciality, the prehospital pain treatment may differ depending on the primary medical education. Aim of this study was to explore the difference in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed emergency medical service. METHODS: Retrospective single centre cohort analysis in a physician staffed ground based emergency medical service from January 2014 until December 2016. A total of 8882 consecutive emergency missions were screened. Primary outcome measure was the difference in application frequency of prehospital analgesics by anaesthesiologist or surgeon. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis including subgroup analysis for trauma and acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 8238 patients were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in the application frequency of analgesics between surgeons and anaesthesiologists especially for opioids (p < 0.001, OR 0.68 [0.56–0.82]). Fentanyl was the most common administered analgesic in the trauma subgroup, but significantly less common used by surgeons (p = 0.005, OR 0.63 [0.46–0.87]). In acute coronary syndrome cases there was no significant difference in morphine administration between anaesthesiologists and surgeons (p = 0.49, OR 0.88 [0.61–1.27]). CONCLUSIONS: Increased training for prehospital pain treatment should be implemented, since opioids were administered notably less frequent by surgeons than by anaesthesiologists. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-019-0683-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6357417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63574172019-02-07 Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis Schaller, Stefan J. Kappler, Felix P. Hofberger, Claudia Sattler, Jens Wagner, Richard Schneider, Gerhard Blobner, Manfred Kanz, Karl-Georg BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although pain treatment is an important objective in prehospital emergency medicine the incidence of oligoanalgesia is still high in prehospital patients. Given that prehospital emergency medicine in Germany is open for physicians of any speciality, the prehospital pain treatment may differ depending on the primary medical education. Aim of this study was to explore the difference in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed emergency medical service. METHODS: Retrospective single centre cohort analysis in a physician staffed ground based emergency medical service from January 2014 until December 2016. A total of 8882 consecutive emergency missions were screened. Primary outcome measure was the difference in application frequency of prehospital analgesics by anaesthesiologist or surgeon. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis including subgroup analysis for trauma and acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 8238 patients were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in the application frequency of analgesics between surgeons and anaesthesiologists especially for opioids (p < 0.001, OR 0.68 [0.56–0.82]). Fentanyl was the most common administered analgesic in the trauma subgroup, but significantly less common used by surgeons (p = 0.005, OR 0.63 [0.46–0.87]). In acute coronary syndrome cases there was no significant difference in morphine administration between anaesthesiologists and surgeons (p = 0.49, OR 0.88 [0.61–1.27]). CONCLUSIONS: Increased training for prehospital pain treatment should be implemented, since opioids were administered notably less frequent by surgeons than by anaesthesiologists. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-019-0683-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6357417/ /pubmed/30704401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0683-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schaller, Stefan J. Kappler, Felix P. Hofberger, Claudia Sattler, Jens Wagner, Richard Schneider, Gerhard Blobner, Manfred Kanz, Karl-Georg Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title | Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_full | Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_short | Differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_sort | differences in pain treatment between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0683-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schallerstefanj differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis AT kapplerfelixp differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis AT hofbergerclaudia differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis AT sattlerjens differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis AT wagnerrichard differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis AT schneidergerhard differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis AT blobnermanfred differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis AT kanzkarlgeorg differencesinpaintreatmentbetweensurgeonsandanaesthesiologistsinaphysicianstaffedprehospitalemergencymedicalservicearetrospectivecohortanalysis |