Cargando…

Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study

BACKGROUND: The analysis of microbiome in respiratory samples is a topic of great interest in chronic respiratory diseases. The method used to prepare sputum samples for microbiome analysis is very heterogeneous. The selection of the most suitable methodology for DNA extraction is fundamental to hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oriano, Martina, Terranova, Leonardo, Teri, Antonio, Sottotetti, Samantha, Ruggiero, Luca, Tafuro, Camilla, Marchisio, Paola, Gramegna, Andrea, Amati, Francesco, Nava, Fabrizio, Franceschi, Elisa, Cariani, Lisa, Blasi, Francesco, Aliberti, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z
_version_ 1783391797038284800
author Oriano, Martina
Terranova, Leonardo
Teri, Antonio
Sottotetti, Samantha
Ruggiero, Luca
Tafuro, Camilla
Marchisio, Paola
Gramegna, Andrea
Amati, Francesco
Nava, Fabrizio
Franceschi, Elisa
Cariani, Lisa
Blasi, Francesco
Aliberti, Stefano
author_facet Oriano, Martina
Terranova, Leonardo
Teri, Antonio
Sottotetti, Samantha
Ruggiero, Luca
Tafuro, Camilla
Marchisio, Paola
Gramegna, Andrea
Amati, Francesco
Nava, Fabrizio
Franceschi, Elisa
Cariani, Lisa
Blasi, Francesco
Aliberti, Stefano
author_sort Oriano, Martina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The analysis of microbiome in respiratory samples is a topic of great interest in chronic respiratory diseases. The method used to prepare sputum samples for microbiome analysis is very heterogeneous. The selection of the most suitable methodology for DNA extraction is fundamental to have the most representative data. The objective of this study was to compare different conditions for DNA extraction from sputum in adult patients with bronchiectasis. METHODS: Five sputum samples from bronchiectasis patients were collected at the Policlinico Hospital in Milan, Italy. Eighteen conditions for DNA extraction were compared, including two enzyme-based (Roche and Zymo) and one beads-based (Mobio) technique. These techniques were tested with/without Dithiothreitol (DTT) and with/without lysostaphin (0.18 and 0.36 mg/mL) step. DNA was quantified, tested using Real-time PCR for 16S rDNA and S. aureus and, then, microbiome was evaluated. RESULTS: Although 16S rDNA was similarly detected across all the different techniques, Roche kit gave the highest DNA yield. The lowest Ct values for Real-time PCR for S. aureus was identified when lysostaphin was added. Considering genera from microbiome, alpha diversity indices did not show any significant differences between techniques, while relative abundances were more similar in presence of DTT. CONCLUSIONS: None of the conditions emerged to be superior to the others even if enzyme-based kits seem to be needed in order to have a higher extraction yield. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6357456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63574562019-02-07 Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study Oriano, Martina Terranova, Leonardo Teri, Antonio Sottotetti, Samantha Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Amati, Francesco Nava, Fabrizio Franceschi, Elisa Cariani, Lisa Blasi, Francesco Aliberti, Stefano Multidiscip Respir Med Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The analysis of microbiome in respiratory samples is a topic of great interest in chronic respiratory diseases. The method used to prepare sputum samples for microbiome analysis is very heterogeneous. The selection of the most suitable methodology for DNA extraction is fundamental to have the most representative data. The objective of this study was to compare different conditions for DNA extraction from sputum in adult patients with bronchiectasis. METHODS: Five sputum samples from bronchiectasis patients were collected at the Policlinico Hospital in Milan, Italy. Eighteen conditions for DNA extraction were compared, including two enzyme-based (Roche and Zymo) and one beads-based (Mobio) technique. These techniques were tested with/without Dithiothreitol (DTT) and with/without lysostaphin (0.18 and 0.36 mg/mL) step. DNA was quantified, tested using Real-time PCR for 16S rDNA and S. aureus and, then, microbiome was evaluated. RESULTS: Although 16S rDNA was similarly detected across all the different techniques, Roche kit gave the highest DNA yield. The lowest Ct values for Real-time PCR for S. aureus was identified when lysostaphin was added. Considering genera from microbiome, alpha diversity indices did not show any significant differences between techniques, while relative abundances were more similar in presence of DTT. CONCLUSIONS: None of the conditions emerged to be superior to the others even if enzyme-based kits seem to be needed in order to have a higher extraction yield. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6357456/ /pubmed/30733864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Oriano, Martina
Terranova, Leonardo
Teri, Antonio
Sottotetti, Samantha
Ruggiero, Luca
Tafuro, Camilla
Marchisio, Paola
Gramegna, Andrea
Amati, Francesco
Nava, Fabrizio
Franceschi, Elisa
Cariani, Lisa
Blasi, Francesco
Aliberti, Stefano
Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study
title Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study
title_full Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study
title_fullStr Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study
title_short Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study
title_sort comparison of different conditions for dna extraction in sputum - a pilot study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z
work_keys_str_mv AT orianomartina comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT terranovaleonardo comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT teriantonio comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT sottotettisamantha comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT ruggieroluca comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT tafurocamilla comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT marchisiopaola comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT gramegnaandrea comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT amatifrancesco comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT navafabrizio comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT franceschielisa comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT carianilisa comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT blasifrancesco comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy
AT alibertistefano comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy