Cargando…
Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study
BACKGROUND: The analysis of microbiome in respiratory samples is a topic of great interest in chronic respiratory diseases. The method used to prepare sputum samples for microbiome analysis is very heterogeneous. The selection of the most suitable methodology for DNA extraction is fundamental to hav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z |
_version_ | 1783391797038284800 |
---|---|
author | Oriano, Martina Terranova, Leonardo Teri, Antonio Sottotetti, Samantha Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Amati, Francesco Nava, Fabrizio Franceschi, Elisa Cariani, Lisa Blasi, Francesco Aliberti, Stefano |
author_facet | Oriano, Martina Terranova, Leonardo Teri, Antonio Sottotetti, Samantha Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Amati, Francesco Nava, Fabrizio Franceschi, Elisa Cariani, Lisa Blasi, Francesco Aliberti, Stefano |
author_sort | Oriano, Martina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The analysis of microbiome in respiratory samples is a topic of great interest in chronic respiratory diseases. The method used to prepare sputum samples for microbiome analysis is very heterogeneous. The selection of the most suitable methodology for DNA extraction is fundamental to have the most representative data. The objective of this study was to compare different conditions for DNA extraction from sputum in adult patients with bronchiectasis. METHODS: Five sputum samples from bronchiectasis patients were collected at the Policlinico Hospital in Milan, Italy. Eighteen conditions for DNA extraction were compared, including two enzyme-based (Roche and Zymo) and one beads-based (Mobio) technique. These techniques were tested with/without Dithiothreitol (DTT) and with/without lysostaphin (0.18 and 0.36 mg/mL) step. DNA was quantified, tested using Real-time PCR for 16S rDNA and S. aureus and, then, microbiome was evaluated. RESULTS: Although 16S rDNA was similarly detected across all the different techniques, Roche kit gave the highest DNA yield. The lowest Ct values for Real-time PCR for S. aureus was identified when lysostaphin was added. Considering genera from microbiome, alpha diversity indices did not show any significant differences between techniques, while relative abundances were more similar in presence of DTT. CONCLUSIONS: None of the conditions emerged to be superior to the others even if enzyme-based kits seem to be needed in order to have a higher extraction yield. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6357456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63574562019-02-07 Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study Oriano, Martina Terranova, Leonardo Teri, Antonio Sottotetti, Samantha Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Amati, Francesco Nava, Fabrizio Franceschi, Elisa Cariani, Lisa Blasi, Francesco Aliberti, Stefano Multidiscip Respir Med Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The analysis of microbiome in respiratory samples is a topic of great interest in chronic respiratory diseases. The method used to prepare sputum samples for microbiome analysis is very heterogeneous. The selection of the most suitable methodology for DNA extraction is fundamental to have the most representative data. The objective of this study was to compare different conditions for DNA extraction from sputum in adult patients with bronchiectasis. METHODS: Five sputum samples from bronchiectasis patients were collected at the Policlinico Hospital in Milan, Italy. Eighteen conditions for DNA extraction were compared, including two enzyme-based (Roche and Zymo) and one beads-based (Mobio) technique. These techniques were tested with/without Dithiothreitol (DTT) and with/without lysostaphin (0.18 and 0.36 mg/mL) step. DNA was quantified, tested using Real-time PCR for 16S rDNA and S. aureus and, then, microbiome was evaluated. RESULTS: Although 16S rDNA was similarly detected across all the different techniques, Roche kit gave the highest DNA yield. The lowest Ct values for Real-time PCR for S. aureus was identified when lysostaphin was added. Considering genera from microbiome, alpha diversity indices did not show any significant differences between techniques, while relative abundances were more similar in presence of DTT. CONCLUSIONS: None of the conditions emerged to be superior to the others even if enzyme-based kits seem to be needed in order to have a higher extraction yield. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6357456/ /pubmed/30733864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Oriano, Martina Terranova, Leonardo Teri, Antonio Sottotetti, Samantha Ruggiero, Luca Tafuro, Camilla Marchisio, Paola Gramegna, Andrea Amati, Francesco Nava, Fabrizio Franceschi, Elisa Cariani, Lisa Blasi, Francesco Aliberti, Stefano Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study |
title | Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study |
title_full | Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study |
title_short | Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study |
title_sort | comparison of different conditions for dna extraction in sputum - a pilot study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orianomartina comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT terranovaleonardo comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT teriantonio comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT sottotettisamantha comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT ruggieroluca comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT tafurocamilla comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT marchisiopaola comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT gramegnaandrea comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT amatifrancesco comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT navafabrizio comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT franceschielisa comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT carianilisa comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT blasifrancesco comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy AT alibertistefano comparisonofdifferentconditionsfordnaextractioninsputumapilotstudy |