Cargando…

Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study

BACKGROUND: Moderately increased motion at the intermediate segment (IS) after skip-level fusion may accelerate disc degeneration. However, limited biomechanical data are available that examine the effects on the IS following cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). The purpose of this study is to investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Ting-kui, Meng, Yang, Wang, Bei-yu, Rong, Xin, Hong, Ying, Ding, Chen, Chen, Hua, Liu, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2425-3
_version_ 1783391806846664704
author Wu, Ting-kui
Meng, Yang
Wang, Bei-yu
Rong, Xin
Hong, Ying
Ding, Chen
Chen, Hua
Liu, Hao
author_facet Wu, Ting-kui
Meng, Yang
Wang, Bei-yu
Rong, Xin
Hong, Ying
Ding, Chen
Chen, Hua
Liu, Hao
author_sort Wu, Ting-kui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Moderately increased motion at the intermediate segment (IS) after skip-level fusion may accelerate disc degeneration. However, limited biomechanical data are available that examine the effects on the IS following cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical changes in the IS of the cervical spine after skip-level fusion or skip-level arthroplasty. METHODS: A finite element model of a healthy cervical spine (C2-C7) was constructed. Two surgical models were developed: (1) skip-level fusion at C3/4 and C5/6 and (2) skip-level arthroplasty at C3/4 and C5/6. A 75-N follower load and 1.0-N·m moments were applied to the top of the C2 vertebra to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the intact model. The end-points in each direction corresponding to the intact model were applied to the surgical models under displacement-control protocols. RESULTS: The ranges of motion (ROMs) of the fusion model were markedly decreased at the operated levels, while the corresponding ROMs of the arthroplasty model were similar to those of the intact spine in all directions. In the fusion model, the ROMs of the IS (C4/5) were markedly increased in all directions. The ROMs in the arthroplasty model were similar to those in the intact spine, and the ROMs of untreated segments were evenly increased. In the fusion model, the intradiscal pressure and facet contact force at were C4/5 remarkably increased and unevenly distributed among the unfused segments. In the arthroplasty model, the IS did not experience additive stress. CONCLUSION: The IS does not experience additive ROM or stress in the intervertebral disc or facet joints after skip-level arthroplasty, which has fewer biomechanical effects on the IS than does skip-level fusion. This study provides a biomechanical rationale for arthroplasty in treating patients with skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6357490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63574902019-02-07 Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study Wu, Ting-kui Meng, Yang Wang, Bei-yu Rong, Xin Hong, Ying Ding, Chen Chen, Hua Liu, Hao BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Moderately increased motion at the intermediate segment (IS) after skip-level fusion may accelerate disc degeneration. However, limited biomechanical data are available that examine the effects on the IS following cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical changes in the IS of the cervical spine after skip-level fusion or skip-level arthroplasty. METHODS: A finite element model of a healthy cervical spine (C2-C7) was constructed. Two surgical models were developed: (1) skip-level fusion at C3/4 and C5/6 and (2) skip-level arthroplasty at C3/4 and C5/6. A 75-N follower load and 1.0-N·m moments were applied to the top of the C2 vertebra to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the intact model. The end-points in each direction corresponding to the intact model were applied to the surgical models under displacement-control protocols. RESULTS: The ranges of motion (ROMs) of the fusion model were markedly decreased at the operated levels, while the corresponding ROMs of the arthroplasty model were similar to those of the intact spine in all directions. In the fusion model, the ROMs of the IS (C4/5) were markedly increased in all directions. The ROMs in the arthroplasty model were similar to those in the intact spine, and the ROMs of untreated segments were evenly increased. In the fusion model, the intradiscal pressure and facet contact force at were C4/5 remarkably increased and unevenly distributed among the unfused segments. In the arthroplasty model, the IS did not experience additive stress. CONCLUSION: The IS does not experience additive ROM or stress in the intervertebral disc or facet joints after skip-level arthroplasty, which has fewer biomechanical effects on the IS than does skip-level fusion. This study provides a biomechanical rationale for arthroplasty in treating patients with skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease. BioMed Central 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6357490/ /pubmed/30704444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2425-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Ting-kui
Meng, Yang
Wang, Bei-yu
Rong, Xin
Hong, Ying
Ding, Chen
Chen, Hua
Liu, Hao
Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study
title Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study
title_full Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study
title_fullStr Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study
title_short Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study
title_sort biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6357490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2425-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wutingkui biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy
AT mengyang biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy
AT wangbeiyu biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy
AT rongxin biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy
AT hongying biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy
AT dingchen biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy
AT chenhua biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy
AT liuhao biomechanicsfollowingskiplevelcervicaldiscarthroplastyversusskiplevelcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementbasedstudy