Cargando…
Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance
This study investigated whether jump training with blood flow restriction (BFR) improves jump performance compared to jump training without BFR under similar exercise intensity in healthy young humans. The participants were twenty healthy males who were assigned to either jump training with BFR (n =...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30765919 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78053 |
_version_ | 1783392005967052800 |
---|---|
author | Horiuchi, Masahiro Endo, Junko Sato, Takashi Okita, Koichi |
author_facet | Horiuchi, Masahiro Endo, Junko Sato, Takashi Okita, Koichi |
author_sort | Horiuchi, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated whether jump training with blood flow restriction (BFR) improves jump performance compared to jump training without BFR under similar exercise intensity in healthy young humans. The participants were twenty healthy males who were assigned to either jump training with BFR (n = 10) or jump training without BFR [control (CON); n = 10] groups. All subjects completed five sets of 10 repetitions with one-minute intervals of half-squat jumps (SJ) at maximal effort, four days a week for four weeks. In the BFR group, circulatory occlusion around both thigh muscles was applied at a pressure of 200 mmHg, and physical characteristics, muscle strength and jump performance were evaluated before and after training. A significant main effect of training period on lean body mass, percentage of body fat and leg circumference in both groups was observed (P < 0.05). For jump training with BFR, only knee flexion strength increased (P < 0.05), while in the CON group, both knee extension and flexion strength increased (P < 0.05). BFR training did not improve SJ or counter-movement jumps (CMJ) (P > 0.05), whereas training without BFR (CON) improved the performance of both jumps (SJ: pre 35.7 ± 5.1 vs. post 38.9 ± 4.1 cm, P = 0.002: CMJ: pre 41.6 ± 3.6 vs. post 44.6 ± 3.8 cm, P < 0.001). These results indicate that jump training with BFR may not be an effective strategy for improving jump performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6358527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Institute of Sport in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63585272019-02-14 Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance Horiuchi, Masahiro Endo, Junko Sato, Takashi Okita, Koichi Biol Sport Original Paper This study investigated whether jump training with blood flow restriction (BFR) improves jump performance compared to jump training without BFR under similar exercise intensity in healthy young humans. The participants were twenty healthy males who were assigned to either jump training with BFR (n = 10) or jump training without BFR [control (CON); n = 10] groups. All subjects completed five sets of 10 repetitions with one-minute intervals of half-squat jumps (SJ) at maximal effort, four days a week for four weeks. In the BFR group, circulatory occlusion around both thigh muscles was applied at a pressure of 200 mmHg, and physical characteristics, muscle strength and jump performance were evaluated before and after training. A significant main effect of training period on lean body mass, percentage of body fat and leg circumference in both groups was observed (P < 0.05). For jump training with BFR, only knee flexion strength increased (P < 0.05), while in the CON group, both knee extension and flexion strength increased (P < 0.05). BFR training did not improve SJ or counter-movement jumps (CMJ) (P > 0.05), whereas training without BFR (CON) improved the performance of both jumps (SJ: pre 35.7 ± 5.1 vs. post 38.9 ± 4.1 cm, P = 0.002: CMJ: pre 41.6 ± 3.6 vs. post 44.6 ± 3.8 cm, P < 0.001). These results indicate that jump training with BFR may not be an effective strategy for improving jump performance. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2018-08-31 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6358527/ /pubmed/30765919 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78053 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Horiuchi, Masahiro Endo, Junko Sato, Takashi Okita, Koichi Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance |
title | Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance |
title_full | Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance |
title_fullStr | Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance |
title_short | Jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance |
title_sort | jump training with blood flow restriction has no effect on jump performance |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30765919 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horiuchimasahiro jumptrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionhasnoeffectonjumpperformance AT endojunko jumptrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionhasnoeffectonjumpperformance AT satotakashi jumptrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionhasnoeffectonjumpperformance AT okitakoichi jumptrainingwithbloodflowrestrictionhasnoeffectonjumpperformance |