Cargando…
Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status?
PURPOSE: Insistence that total regression of primary tumor would not represent long-term oncologic outcomes has been raised. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of these patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) and radical surgery and to evaluate the associated risk fact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30746355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.96.2.78 |
_version_ | 1783392024533139456 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Seong-A Park, In Ja Hong, Seung Mo Bong, Jun Woo Choi, Hye Yoon Seo, Ji Hyun Kim, Hyong Eun Lim, Seok-Byung Yu, Chang Sik Kim, Jin Cheon |
author_facet | Jeong, Seong-A Park, In Ja Hong, Seung Mo Bong, Jun Woo Choi, Hye Yoon Seo, Ji Hyun Kim, Hyong Eun Lim, Seok-Byung Yu, Chang Sik Kim, Jin Cheon |
author_sort | Jeong, Seong-A |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Insistence that total regression of primary tumor would not represent long-term oncologic outcomes has been raised. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of these patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) and radical surgery and to evaluate the associated risk factors. METHODS: We included 189 patients with rectal cancer who showed total regression of the primary tumor after PCRT, followed by radical resection, between 2001 and 2012. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the results were compared with 77 patients with Tis rectal cancer who received only radical resection. Factors associated with RFS were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Sphincter-saving resection was performed for 146 patients (77.2%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 168 patients (88.9%). During the follow-up period, recurrence occurred in 17 patients (9%). The 5-year RFS was 91.3%, which was significantly lower than that of patients with Tis rectal cancer without PCRT (P = 0.005). In univariate analysis, preoperative CEA and histologic differentiation were associated with RFS. However, no factors were found to be associated with RFS. CONCLUSION: RFS was lower in patients with total regression of primary rectal cancer after PCRT than in those with Tis rectal cancer without PCRT, and it would not be considered as the same entity with early rectal cancer or “disappeared tumor” status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6358592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63585922019-02-11 Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? Jeong, Seong-A Park, In Ja Hong, Seung Mo Bong, Jun Woo Choi, Hye Yoon Seo, Ji Hyun Kim, Hyong Eun Lim, Seok-Byung Yu, Chang Sik Kim, Jin Cheon Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Insistence that total regression of primary tumor would not represent long-term oncologic outcomes has been raised. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of these patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) and radical surgery and to evaluate the associated risk factors. METHODS: We included 189 patients with rectal cancer who showed total regression of the primary tumor after PCRT, followed by radical resection, between 2001 and 2012. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the results were compared with 77 patients with Tis rectal cancer who received only radical resection. Factors associated with RFS were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Sphincter-saving resection was performed for 146 patients (77.2%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 168 patients (88.9%). During the follow-up period, recurrence occurred in 17 patients (9%). The 5-year RFS was 91.3%, which was significantly lower than that of patients with Tis rectal cancer without PCRT (P = 0.005). In univariate analysis, preoperative CEA and histologic differentiation were associated with RFS. However, no factors were found to be associated with RFS. CONCLUSION: RFS was lower in patients with total regression of primary rectal cancer after PCRT than in those with Tis rectal cancer without PCRT, and it would not be considered as the same entity with early rectal cancer or “disappeared tumor” status. The Korean Surgical Society 2019-02 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6358592/ /pubmed/30746355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.96.2.78 Text en Copyright © 2019, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jeong, Seong-A Park, In Ja Hong, Seung Mo Bong, Jun Woo Choi, Hye Yoon Seo, Ji Hyun Kim, Hyong Eun Lim, Seok-Byung Yu, Chang Sik Kim, Jin Cheon Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? |
title | Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? |
title_full | Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? |
title_fullStr | Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? |
title_short | Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? |
title_sort | does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent “no tumor” status? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30746355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.96.2.78 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongseonga doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT parkinja doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT hongseungmo doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT bongjunwoo doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT choihyeyoon doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT seojihyun doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT kimhyongeun doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT limseokbyung doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT yuchangsik doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus AT kimjincheon doestotalregressionofprimaryrectalcancerafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapyrepresentnotumorstatus |