Tradeoff Negotiation: The Importance of Getting in the Game: Comment on "Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage"

Swiss-CHAT’s playful approach to public rationing can be considered in terms of deliberative process design as well as in terms of health policy. The process’ forced negotiation of trade-offs exposed unexamined driving questions, and challenged prevalent presumptions about health care demand and abo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mongoven, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709091
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.86
Descripción
Sumario:Swiss-CHAT’s playful approach to public rationing can be considered in terms of deliberative process design as well as in terms of health policy. The process’ forced negotiation of trade-offs exposed unexamined driving questions, and challenged prevalent presumptions about health care demand and about conditions of public reasoning that enable transparent rationing. While the experiment provided grounds for optimism that public deliberation can contribute to the design of fair insurance service-packages, it also left unanswered questions. What are the ethical and policy implications of non-consensuses? What is the presumed relationship between process and justice of outcome?

Ejemplares similares