Cargando…

Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review

Background: Nowadays, health systems are generally acknowledged to be complex social systems. Consequently, scholars, academics, practitioners, and policy-makers are exploring how to adopt a complexity perspective in health policy and system research. While leadership and complexity has been studied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belrhiti, Zakaria, Nebot Giralt, Ariadna, Marchal, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709082
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.75
_version_ 1783392042730127360
author Belrhiti, Zakaria
Nebot Giralt, Ariadna
Marchal, Bruno
author_facet Belrhiti, Zakaria
Nebot Giralt, Ariadna
Marchal, Bruno
author_sort Belrhiti, Zakaria
collection PubMed
description Background: Nowadays, health systems are generally acknowledged to be complex social systems. Consequently, scholars, academics, practitioners, and policy-makers are exploring how to adopt a complexity perspective in health policy and system research. While leadership and complexity has been studied extensively outside health, the implications of complexity theories for the study of leadership in healthcare have received limited attention. We carried out a scoping review of complex leadership (CL) in healthcare to investigate how CL in healthcare has been defined, theorised and conceptualised and to explore how ‘CL’ has been applied in healthcare settings. Methods: We followed the methodological steps proposed by (Arksey and O’Malley, 2005): (1) specifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, (5) collating and summarizing the findings, and (6) reporting the results. We searched using Medline, Psychinfo, Wiley online library, and Google Scholar. Our inclusion criteria were: publication type (peer reviewed articles, theses, and book chapters); phenomenon of interest: complex leadership; context: healthcare and period of publication: between 2000 and 2016. Results: Our search and selection resulted in 37 papers (16 conceptual papers, 14 empirical studies and 7 advocacy papers). We note that empirical studies on CL are few and almost all research reported by these papers was carried out in the North (mainly in USA and UK). We found that there is some variation in definitions of CL. Furthermore, the research papers adopt mostly an explorative or explanatory approach and do not focus on assessing effectiveness of CL approaches. Finally, we found that the majority of researchers seem to adhere to the mathematical complexity perspective. Conclusion: Complexity concepts derived from natural sciences may not automatically fit management of health services. Further research into how social complexity theories may offer researchers useful grounds to empirically test CL theories in health settings is warranted. Specific attention should be paid to the multi-layered nature of leadership.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6358662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63586622019-02-06 Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review Belrhiti, Zakaria Nebot Giralt, Ariadna Marchal, Bruno Int J Health Policy Manag Scoping Review Background: Nowadays, health systems are generally acknowledged to be complex social systems. Consequently, scholars, academics, practitioners, and policy-makers are exploring how to adopt a complexity perspective in health policy and system research. While leadership and complexity has been studied extensively outside health, the implications of complexity theories for the study of leadership in healthcare have received limited attention. We carried out a scoping review of complex leadership (CL) in healthcare to investigate how CL in healthcare has been defined, theorised and conceptualised and to explore how ‘CL’ has been applied in healthcare settings. Methods: We followed the methodological steps proposed by (Arksey and O’Malley, 2005): (1) specifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, (5) collating and summarizing the findings, and (6) reporting the results. We searched using Medline, Psychinfo, Wiley online library, and Google Scholar. Our inclusion criteria were: publication type (peer reviewed articles, theses, and book chapters); phenomenon of interest: complex leadership; context: healthcare and period of publication: between 2000 and 2016. Results: Our search and selection resulted in 37 papers (16 conceptual papers, 14 empirical studies and 7 advocacy papers). We note that empirical studies on CL are few and almost all research reported by these papers was carried out in the North (mainly in USA and UK). We found that there is some variation in definitions of CL. Furthermore, the research papers adopt mostly an explorative or explanatory approach and do not focus on assessing effectiveness of CL approaches. Finally, we found that the majority of researchers seem to adhere to the mathematical complexity perspective. Conclusion: Complexity concepts derived from natural sciences may not automatically fit management of health services. Further research into how social complexity theories may offer researchers useful grounds to empirically test CL theories in health settings is warranted. Specific attention should be paid to the multi-layered nature of leadership. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6358662/ /pubmed/30709082 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.75 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Scoping Review
Belrhiti, Zakaria
Nebot Giralt, Ariadna
Marchal, Bruno
Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
title Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
title_full Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
title_short Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
title_sort complex leadership in healthcare: a scoping review
topic Scoping Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709082
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.75
work_keys_str_mv AT belrhitizakaria complexleadershipinhealthcareascopingreview
AT nebotgiraltariadna complexleadershipinhealthcareascopingreview
AT marchalbruno complexleadershipinhealthcareascopingreview