Cargando…

Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience

Background and objectives: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a hemodynamic state characterized by chronic obstruction in pulmonary circulation. The treatment of choice is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). The aim of our study was to compile and analyze the data of a small, natio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sablinskis, Matiss, Sablinskis, Kristaps, Skride, Andris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30650662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55010018
_version_ 1783392082639978496
author Sablinskis, Matiss
Sablinskis, Kristaps
Skride, Andris
author_facet Sablinskis, Matiss
Sablinskis, Kristaps
Skride, Andris
author_sort Sablinskis, Matiss
collection PubMed
description Background and objectives: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a hemodynamic state characterized by chronic obstruction in pulmonary circulation. The treatment of choice is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). The aim of our study was to compile and analyze the data of a small, national center, which has not yet been done in the Baltic states. Materials and methods: The data of Latvian CTEPH registry in timeframe from 1 September 2007 to 31 December 2016 was retrospectively analyzed and all patients who underwent PEA were included. Results: PEA was done for 7 patients. The in-hospital mortality was 14%. The 3-year survival rate was 86%. The procedure restored pulmonary blood pressure to normal values for three of the patients (42%). The remaining four patients (57%) had persistent pulmonary hypertension (mPAP > 30 mmHg), which required continuous therapy. There was a comparable decline in mean mPAP compared to baseline, 53.4 ± 14.4 mmHg to 44.3 ± 30 mmHg, respectively. At 12-month follow-up, there was a significant improvement in functional capacity, as seen by increased 6-min walk test distance and shifts in New York Heart Association functional class. Conclusions: Only 16% of all prevalent Latvian CTEPH patients have underwent PEA in the course of nine years, despite it being the treatment of choice for CTEPH. As PEA and other emerging treatment options, such as balloon pulmonary angioplasty, can only be done in expert centers, numerous organizational, logistical, and economic issues arise for patients of smaller countries, where such centers have not yet been created due to lack of experience and limited amount of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6358844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63588442019-02-13 Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience Sablinskis, Matiss Sablinskis, Kristaps Skride, Andris Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a hemodynamic state characterized by chronic obstruction in pulmonary circulation. The treatment of choice is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). The aim of our study was to compile and analyze the data of a small, national center, which has not yet been done in the Baltic states. Materials and methods: The data of Latvian CTEPH registry in timeframe from 1 September 2007 to 31 December 2016 was retrospectively analyzed and all patients who underwent PEA were included. Results: PEA was done for 7 patients. The in-hospital mortality was 14%. The 3-year survival rate was 86%. The procedure restored pulmonary blood pressure to normal values for three of the patients (42%). The remaining four patients (57%) had persistent pulmonary hypertension (mPAP > 30 mmHg), which required continuous therapy. There was a comparable decline in mean mPAP compared to baseline, 53.4 ± 14.4 mmHg to 44.3 ± 30 mmHg, respectively. At 12-month follow-up, there was a significant improvement in functional capacity, as seen by increased 6-min walk test distance and shifts in New York Heart Association functional class. Conclusions: Only 16% of all prevalent Latvian CTEPH patients have underwent PEA in the course of nine years, despite it being the treatment of choice for CTEPH. As PEA and other emerging treatment options, such as balloon pulmonary angioplasty, can only be done in expert centers, numerous organizational, logistical, and economic issues arise for patients of smaller countries, where such centers have not yet been created due to lack of experience and limited amount of patients. MDPI 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6358844/ /pubmed/30650662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55010018 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sablinskis, Matiss
Sablinskis, Kristaps
Skride, Andris
Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience
title Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience
title_full Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience
title_fullStr Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience
title_short Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Latvia: A National Experience
title_sort pulmonary endarterectomy in latvia: a national experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30650662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55010018
work_keys_str_mv AT sablinskismatiss pulmonaryendarterectomyinlatviaanationalexperience
AT sablinskiskristaps pulmonaryendarterectomyinlatviaanationalexperience
AT skrideandris pulmonaryendarterectomyinlatviaanationalexperience