Cargando…

Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective

Episodic future thinking (EFT), or prospectively imagining yourself in the future, has been developed into an intervention tool to reduce delay discounting (DD), or the preference for smaller immediate over larger future rewards, and to make healthier choices that promote long-term health rather tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donnell, Sara, Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna, Epstein, Leonard H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs9010001
_version_ 1783392164870356992
author O’Donnell, Sara
Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna
Epstein, Leonard H.
author_facet O’Donnell, Sara
Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna
Epstein, Leonard H.
author_sort O’Donnell, Sara
collection PubMed
description Episodic future thinking (EFT), or prospectively imagining yourself in the future, has been developed into an intervention tool to reduce delay discounting (DD), or the preference for smaller immediate over larger future rewards, and to make healthier choices that promote long-term health rather than short-term enjoyment. Most EFT interventions use EFT cues whose future events match the time delays of the DD task, which may limit the utility of EFT. The current study (N = 160, M(age) = 35.25, 47.5% female) used a 2 × 2 factorial design with type of episodic thinking (matched, unmatched) and temporal perspective (EFT, episodic recent thinking (ERT)) as between-subject factors to investigate whether there were differences in DD for groups that had EFT cues matched to the time delays of the DD task in comparison to cues with unmatched temporal delays. The results showed EFT reduced DD compared to ERT controls, and no differences emerged between matched and unmatched EFT groups. Our findings suggest that either the process of generating EFT cues or the use of any positive and vivid future event, regardless of whether it is matched to the DD task, can reduce DD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63591522019-02-08 Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective O’Donnell, Sara Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna Epstein, Leonard H. Behav Sci (Basel) Article Episodic future thinking (EFT), or prospectively imagining yourself in the future, has been developed into an intervention tool to reduce delay discounting (DD), or the preference for smaller immediate over larger future rewards, and to make healthier choices that promote long-term health rather than short-term enjoyment. Most EFT interventions use EFT cues whose future events match the time delays of the DD task, which may limit the utility of EFT. The current study (N = 160, M(age) = 35.25, 47.5% female) used a 2 × 2 factorial design with type of episodic thinking (matched, unmatched) and temporal perspective (EFT, episodic recent thinking (ERT)) as between-subject factors to investigate whether there were differences in DD for groups that had EFT cues matched to the time delays of the DD task in comparison to cues with unmatched temporal delays. The results showed EFT reduced DD compared to ERT controls, and no differences emerged between matched and unmatched EFT groups. Our findings suggest that either the process of generating EFT cues or the use of any positive and vivid future event, regardless of whether it is matched to the DD task, can reduce DD. MDPI 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6359152/ /pubmed/30577671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs9010001 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
O’Donnell, Sara
Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna
Epstein, Leonard H.
Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective
title Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective
title_full Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective
title_fullStr Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective
title_full_unstemmed Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective
title_short Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective
title_sort mix and match: an investigation into whether episodic future thinking cues need to match discounting delays in order to be effective
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs9010001
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnellsara mixandmatchaninvestigationintowhetherepisodicfuturethinkingcuesneedtomatchdiscountingdelaysinordertobeeffective
AT hollishansenkelseanna mixandmatchaninvestigationintowhetherepisodicfuturethinkingcuesneedtomatchdiscountingdelaysinordertobeeffective
AT epsteinleonardh mixandmatchaninvestigationintowhetherepisodicfuturethinkingcuesneedtomatchdiscountingdelaysinordertobeeffective