Cargando…
Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis
Prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is effective for pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, the appropriate time to start this treatment remains unclear. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Starting on 1 February 2014, patients with Ja...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30650652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7010011 |
_version_ | 1783392267108614144 |
---|---|
author | Haruna, Takenori Kariya, Shin Higaki, Takaya Makihara, Sei-ichiro Kanai, Kengo Komatsubara, Yasutoshi Oka, Aiko Nishizaki, Kazunori Okano, Mitsuhiro |
author_facet | Haruna, Takenori Kariya, Shin Higaki, Takaya Makihara, Sei-ichiro Kanai, Kengo Komatsubara, Yasutoshi Oka, Aiko Nishizaki, Kazunori Okano, Mitsuhiro |
author_sort | Haruna, Takenori |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is effective for pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, the appropriate time to start this treatment remains unclear. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Starting on 1 February 2014, patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis received either fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) for 8 weeks (Group A: n = 24), placebo nasal spray for 2 weeks followed by FFNS for 6 weeks (Group B: n = 23), or placebo for 4 weeks followed by FFNS for 4 weeks (Group C: n = 23). The primary endpoint was comparison of the total naso-ocular symptom score (TSS). Secondary endpoints including the increment cost effective ratio (ICER) were also determined. Continuous pollen dispersion began on the 24th of February. Therefore, Group A and Group B received 3-weeks and 1-week of prophylactic treatment, respectively, whereas Group C received post-onset treatment. During the peak pollen-dispersal period, significant differences in TSS were seen between the groups, particularly between Group A and C. The ICER of Group B vs. Group C was lower than that of Group A vs. Group C. These results suggest that long-term prophylactic treatment with FFNS is clinically the most potent treatment, whereas short-term prophylactic treatment is cost effective for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6359498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63594982019-02-11 Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Haruna, Takenori Kariya, Shin Higaki, Takaya Makihara, Sei-ichiro Kanai, Kengo Komatsubara, Yasutoshi Oka, Aiko Nishizaki, Kazunori Okano, Mitsuhiro Med Sci (Basel) Article Prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is effective for pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, the appropriate time to start this treatment remains unclear. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Starting on 1 February 2014, patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis received either fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) for 8 weeks (Group A: n = 24), placebo nasal spray for 2 weeks followed by FFNS for 6 weeks (Group B: n = 23), or placebo for 4 weeks followed by FFNS for 4 weeks (Group C: n = 23). The primary endpoint was comparison of the total naso-ocular symptom score (TSS). Secondary endpoints including the increment cost effective ratio (ICER) were also determined. Continuous pollen dispersion began on the 24th of February. Therefore, Group A and Group B received 3-weeks and 1-week of prophylactic treatment, respectively, whereas Group C received post-onset treatment. During the peak pollen-dispersal period, significant differences in TSS were seen between the groups, particularly between Group A and C. The ICER of Group B vs. Group C was lower than that of Group A vs. Group C. These results suggest that long-term prophylactic treatment with FFNS is clinically the most potent treatment, whereas short-term prophylactic treatment is cost effective for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. MDPI 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6359498/ /pubmed/30650652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7010011 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Haruna, Takenori Kariya, Shin Higaki, Takaya Makihara, Sei-ichiro Kanai, Kengo Komatsubara, Yasutoshi Oka, Aiko Nishizaki, Kazunori Okano, Mitsuhiro Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis |
title | Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis |
title_full | Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis |
title_fullStr | Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis |
title_short | Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis |
title_sort | determining an appropriate time to start prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids in japanese cedar pollinosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30650652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7010011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harunatakenori determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT kariyashin determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT higakitakaya determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT makiharaseiichiro determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT kanaikengo determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT komatsubarayasutoshi determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT okaaiko determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT nishizakikazunori determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis AT okanomitsuhiro determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis |