Cargando…

Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis

Prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is effective for pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, the appropriate time to start this treatment remains unclear. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Starting on 1 February 2014, patients with Ja...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haruna, Takenori, Kariya, Shin, Higaki, Takaya, Makihara, Sei-ichiro, Kanai, Kengo, Komatsubara, Yasutoshi, Oka, Aiko, Nishizaki, Kazunori, Okano, Mitsuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30650652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7010011
_version_ 1783392267108614144
author Haruna, Takenori
Kariya, Shin
Higaki, Takaya
Makihara, Sei-ichiro
Kanai, Kengo
Komatsubara, Yasutoshi
Oka, Aiko
Nishizaki, Kazunori
Okano, Mitsuhiro
author_facet Haruna, Takenori
Kariya, Shin
Higaki, Takaya
Makihara, Sei-ichiro
Kanai, Kengo
Komatsubara, Yasutoshi
Oka, Aiko
Nishizaki, Kazunori
Okano, Mitsuhiro
author_sort Haruna, Takenori
collection PubMed
description Prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is effective for pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, the appropriate time to start this treatment remains unclear. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Starting on 1 February 2014, patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis received either fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) for 8 weeks (Group A: n = 24), placebo nasal spray for 2 weeks followed by FFNS for 6 weeks (Group B: n = 23), or placebo for 4 weeks followed by FFNS for 4 weeks (Group C: n = 23). The primary endpoint was comparison of the total naso-ocular symptom score (TSS). Secondary endpoints including the increment cost effective ratio (ICER) were also determined. Continuous pollen dispersion began on the 24th of February. Therefore, Group A and Group B received 3-weeks and 1-week of prophylactic treatment, respectively, whereas Group C received post-onset treatment. During the peak pollen-dispersal period, significant differences in TSS were seen between the groups, particularly between Group A and C. The ICER of Group B vs. Group C was lower than that of Group A vs. Group C. These results suggest that long-term prophylactic treatment with FFNS is clinically the most potent treatment, whereas short-term prophylactic treatment is cost effective for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63594982019-02-11 Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Haruna, Takenori Kariya, Shin Higaki, Takaya Makihara, Sei-ichiro Kanai, Kengo Komatsubara, Yasutoshi Oka, Aiko Nishizaki, Kazunori Okano, Mitsuhiro Med Sci (Basel) Article Prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is effective for pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, the appropriate time to start this treatment remains unclear. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Starting on 1 February 2014, patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis received either fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) for 8 weeks (Group A: n = 24), placebo nasal spray for 2 weeks followed by FFNS for 6 weeks (Group B: n = 23), or placebo for 4 weeks followed by FFNS for 4 weeks (Group C: n = 23). The primary endpoint was comparison of the total naso-ocular symptom score (TSS). Secondary endpoints including the increment cost effective ratio (ICER) were also determined. Continuous pollen dispersion began on the 24th of February. Therefore, Group A and Group B received 3-weeks and 1-week of prophylactic treatment, respectively, whereas Group C received post-onset treatment. During the peak pollen-dispersal period, significant differences in TSS were seen between the groups, particularly between Group A and C. The ICER of Group B vs. Group C was lower than that of Group A vs. Group C. These results suggest that long-term prophylactic treatment with FFNS is clinically the most potent treatment, whereas short-term prophylactic treatment is cost effective for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. MDPI 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6359498/ /pubmed/30650652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7010011 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haruna, Takenori
Kariya, Shin
Higaki, Takaya
Makihara, Sei-ichiro
Kanai, Kengo
Komatsubara, Yasutoshi
Oka, Aiko
Nishizaki, Kazunori
Okano, Mitsuhiro
Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis
title Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis
title_full Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis
title_fullStr Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis
title_full_unstemmed Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis
title_short Determining an Appropriate Time to Start Prophylactic Treatment with Intranasal Corticosteroids in Japanese Cedar Pollinosis
title_sort determining an appropriate time to start prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids in japanese cedar pollinosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30650652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7010011
work_keys_str_mv AT harunatakenori determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT kariyashin determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT higakitakaya determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT makiharaseiichiro determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT kanaikengo determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT komatsubarayasutoshi determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT okaaiko determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT nishizakikazunori determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis
AT okanomitsuhiro determininganappropriatetimetostartprophylactictreatmentwithintranasalcorticosteroidsinjapanesecedarpollinosis