Cargando…
The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions
The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol(®)—a single sensor wireless insole—is a valid and reliable method of assessing...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30641910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020265 |
_version_ | 1783392269045334016 |
---|---|
author | Renner, Kristen E. Williams, DS Blaise Queen, Robin M. |
author_facet | Renner, Kristen E. Williams, DS Blaise Queen, Robin M. |
author_sort | Renner, Kristen E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol(®)—a single sensor wireless insole—is a valid and reliable method of assessing force. Thirty (17 male and 13 female) recreationally active individuals were recruited for a two visit study where they walked (1.3 m/s) and ran (3.0 and 3.5 m/s) at a 0%, 10% incline, and 10% decline, with the visits approximately one week apart. Ground reaction force data was collected on an instrumented treadmill (1440 Hz) and with the loadsol(®) (100 Hz). Ten individuals completed the day 1 protocol with a newer 200 Hz loadsol(®). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k) were used to assess validity and reliability and Bland–Altman plots were generated to better understand loadsol(®) validity. Across conditions, the peak force ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.97, which increased to 0.84–0.99 with the 200 Hz insoles. Similarly, the loading rate ICCs improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.80–0.96 and impulse improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.90–0.97. The 200 Hz insoles may be needed for loading rate and impulse in running. For both walking and running, the loadsol(®) has excellent between-day reliability (>0.76). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6359506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63595062019-02-06 The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions Renner, Kristen E. Williams, DS Blaise Queen, Robin M. Sensors (Basel) Article The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol(®)—a single sensor wireless insole—is a valid and reliable method of assessing force. Thirty (17 male and 13 female) recreationally active individuals were recruited for a two visit study where they walked (1.3 m/s) and ran (3.0 and 3.5 m/s) at a 0%, 10% incline, and 10% decline, with the visits approximately one week apart. Ground reaction force data was collected on an instrumented treadmill (1440 Hz) and with the loadsol(®) (100 Hz). Ten individuals completed the day 1 protocol with a newer 200 Hz loadsol(®). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k) were used to assess validity and reliability and Bland–Altman plots were generated to better understand loadsol(®) validity. Across conditions, the peak force ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.97, which increased to 0.84–0.99 with the 200 Hz insoles. Similarly, the loading rate ICCs improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.80–0.96 and impulse improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.90–0.97. The 200 Hz insoles may be needed for loading rate and impulse in running. For both walking and running, the loadsol(®) has excellent between-day reliability (>0.76). MDPI 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6359506/ /pubmed/30641910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020265 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Renner, Kristen E. Williams, DS Blaise Queen, Robin M. The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions |
title | The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions |
title_full | The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions |
title_fullStr | The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions |
title_short | The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the loadsol(®) under various walking and running conditions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30641910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rennerkristene thereliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions AT williamsdsblaise thereliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions AT queenrobinm thereliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions AT rennerkristene reliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions AT williamsdsblaise reliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions AT queenrobinm reliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions |