Cargando…

The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions

The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol(®)—a single sensor wireless insole—is a valid and reliable method of assessing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renner, Kristen E., Williams, DS Blaise, Queen, Robin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30641910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020265
_version_ 1783392269045334016
author Renner, Kristen E.
Williams, DS Blaise
Queen, Robin M.
author_facet Renner, Kristen E.
Williams, DS Blaise
Queen, Robin M.
author_sort Renner, Kristen E.
collection PubMed
description The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol(®)—a single sensor wireless insole—is a valid and reliable method of assessing force. Thirty (17 male and 13 female) recreationally active individuals were recruited for a two visit study where they walked (1.3 m/s) and ran (3.0 and 3.5 m/s) at a 0%, 10% incline, and 10% decline, with the visits approximately one week apart. Ground reaction force data was collected on an instrumented treadmill (1440 Hz) and with the loadsol(®) (100 Hz). Ten individuals completed the day 1 protocol with a newer 200 Hz loadsol(®). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k) were used to assess validity and reliability and Bland–Altman plots were generated to better understand loadsol(®) validity. Across conditions, the peak force ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.97, which increased to 0.84–0.99 with the 200 Hz insoles. Similarly, the loading rate ICCs improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.80–0.96 and impulse improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.90–0.97. The 200 Hz insoles may be needed for loading rate and impulse in running. For both walking and running, the loadsol(®) has excellent between-day reliability (>0.76).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63595062019-02-06 The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions Renner, Kristen E. Williams, DS Blaise Queen, Robin M. Sensors (Basel) Article The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol(®)—a single sensor wireless insole—is a valid and reliable method of assessing force. Thirty (17 male and 13 female) recreationally active individuals were recruited for a two visit study where they walked (1.3 m/s) and ran (3.0 and 3.5 m/s) at a 0%, 10% incline, and 10% decline, with the visits approximately one week apart. Ground reaction force data was collected on an instrumented treadmill (1440 Hz) and with the loadsol(®) (100 Hz). Ten individuals completed the day 1 protocol with a newer 200 Hz loadsol(®). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k) were used to assess validity and reliability and Bland–Altman plots were generated to better understand loadsol(®) validity. Across conditions, the peak force ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.97, which increased to 0.84–0.99 with the 200 Hz insoles. Similarly, the loading rate ICCs improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.80–0.96 and impulse improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.90–0.97. The 200 Hz insoles may be needed for loading rate and impulse in running. For both walking and running, the loadsol(®) has excellent between-day reliability (>0.76). MDPI 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6359506/ /pubmed/30641910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020265 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Renner, Kristen E.
Williams, DS Blaise
Queen, Robin M.
The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions
title The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions
title_full The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions
title_fullStr The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions
title_short The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol(®) under Various Walking and Running Conditions
title_sort reliability and validity of the loadsol(®) under various walking and running conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30641910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020265
work_keys_str_mv AT rennerkristene thereliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions
AT williamsdsblaise thereliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions
AT queenrobinm thereliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions
AT rennerkristene reliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions
AT williamsdsblaise reliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions
AT queenrobinm reliabilityandvalidityoftheloadsolundervariouswalkingandrunningconditions