Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers

Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gustafsson, Simon, Westermann, Frank, Hanrieder, Tobias, Jung, Laura, Ruppach, Horst, Mihranyan, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes9010001
_version_ 1783392270803795968
author Gustafsson, Simon
Westermann, Frank
Hanrieder, Tobias
Jung, Laura
Ruppach, Horst
Mihranyan, Albert
author_facet Gustafsson, Simon
Westermann, Frank
Hanrieder, Tobias
Jung, Laura
Ruppach, Horst
Mihranyan, Albert
author_sort Gustafsson, Simon
collection PubMed
description Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryoporometry with differential scanning calorimetry (CP-DSC) methods with respect to characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter paper based on cellulose nanofibers, i.e. the mille-feuille filter. The filters were further characterized with atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Finally, the removal of the worst-case model virus, i.e. minute virus of mice (MVM; 20 nm, nonenveloped parvovirus) was evaluated. The results revealed that there is no difference of the obtained PSDs between the wet methods, i.e. DSC and liquid-liquid porometry (LLP), as well as no difference between the regular and cross-linked filters regardless of method. MVM filtration at different trans membrane pressure (TMP) revealed strong dependence of the virus removal capability on applied pressure. It was further observed that cross-linking filters showed enhanced virus removal, especially at lower TMP. In all, the results of this study highlight the complex nature of virus capture in size-exclusion filters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63595132019-02-14 Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers Gustafsson, Simon Westermann, Frank Hanrieder, Tobias Jung, Laura Ruppach, Horst Mihranyan, Albert Membranes (Basel) Article Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryoporometry with differential scanning calorimetry (CP-DSC) methods with respect to characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter paper based on cellulose nanofibers, i.e. the mille-feuille filter. The filters were further characterized with atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Finally, the removal of the worst-case model virus, i.e. minute virus of mice (MVM; 20 nm, nonenveloped parvovirus) was evaluated. The results revealed that there is no difference of the obtained PSDs between the wet methods, i.e. DSC and liquid-liquid porometry (LLP), as well as no difference between the regular and cross-linked filters regardless of method. MVM filtration at different trans membrane pressure (TMP) revealed strong dependence of the virus removal capability on applied pressure. It was further observed that cross-linking filters showed enhanced virus removal, especially at lower TMP. In all, the results of this study highlight the complex nature of virus capture in size-exclusion filters. MDPI 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6359513/ /pubmed/30577520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes9010001 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gustafsson, Simon
Westermann, Frank
Hanrieder, Tobias
Jung, Laura
Ruppach, Horst
Mihranyan, Albert
Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_full Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_short Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_sort comparative analysis of dry and wet porometry methods for characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter papers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes9010001
work_keys_str_mv AT gustafssonsimon comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT westermannfrank comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT hanriedertobias comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT junglaura comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT ruppachhorst comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT mihranyanalbert comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers