Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes9010001 |
_version_ | 1783392270803795968 |
---|---|
author | Gustafsson, Simon Westermann, Frank Hanrieder, Tobias Jung, Laura Ruppach, Horst Mihranyan, Albert |
author_facet | Gustafsson, Simon Westermann, Frank Hanrieder, Tobias Jung, Laura Ruppach, Horst Mihranyan, Albert |
author_sort | Gustafsson, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryoporometry with differential scanning calorimetry (CP-DSC) methods with respect to characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter paper based on cellulose nanofibers, i.e. the mille-feuille filter. The filters were further characterized with atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Finally, the removal of the worst-case model virus, i.e. minute virus of mice (MVM; 20 nm, nonenveloped parvovirus) was evaluated. The results revealed that there is no difference of the obtained PSDs between the wet methods, i.e. DSC and liquid-liquid porometry (LLP), as well as no difference between the regular and cross-linked filters regardless of method. MVM filtration at different trans membrane pressure (TMP) revealed strong dependence of the virus removal capability on applied pressure. It was further observed that cross-linking filters showed enhanced virus removal, especially at lower TMP. In all, the results of this study highlight the complex nature of virus capture in size-exclusion filters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6359513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63595132019-02-14 Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers Gustafsson, Simon Westermann, Frank Hanrieder, Tobias Jung, Laura Ruppach, Horst Mihranyan, Albert Membranes (Basel) Article Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryoporometry with differential scanning calorimetry (CP-DSC) methods with respect to characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter paper based on cellulose nanofibers, i.e. the mille-feuille filter. The filters were further characterized with atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Finally, the removal of the worst-case model virus, i.e. minute virus of mice (MVM; 20 nm, nonenveloped parvovirus) was evaluated. The results revealed that there is no difference of the obtained PSDs between the wet methods, i.e. DSC and liquid-liquid porometry (LLP), as well as no difference between the regular and cross-linked filters regardless of method. MVM filtration at different trans membrane pressure (TMP) revealed strong dependence of the virus removal capability on applied pressure. It was further observed that cross-linking filters showed enhanced virus removal, especially at lower TMP. In all, the results of this study highlight the complex nature of virus capture in size-exclusion filters. MDPI 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6359513/ /pubmed/30577520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes9010001 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gustafsson, Simon Westermann, Frank Hanrieder, Tobias Jung, Laura Ruppach, Horst Mihranyan, Albert Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers |
title | Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers |
title_sort | comparative analysis of dry and wet porometry methods for characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter papers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes9010001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gustafssonsimon comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers AT westermannfrank comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers AT hanriedertobias comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers AT junglaura comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers AT ruppachhorst comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers AT mihranyanalbert comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers |