Cargando…
Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System
The majority of wearable sensor-based biofeedback systems used in exercise rehabilitation lack end-user evaluation as part of the development process. This study sought to evaluate an exemplar sensor-based biofeedback system, investigating the feasibility, usability, perceived impact and user experi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30669657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020432 |
_version_ | 1783392311933140992 |
---|---|
author | Argent, Rob Slevin, Patrick Bevilacqua, Antonio Neligan, Maurice Daly, Ailish Caulfield, Brian |
author_facet | Argent, Rob Slevin, Patrick Bevilacqua, Antonio Neligan, Maurice Daly, Ailish Caulfield, Brian |
author_sort | Argent, Rob |
collection | PubMed |
description | The majority of wearable sensor-based biofeedback systems used in exercise rehabilitation lack end-user evaluation as part of the development process. This study sought to evaluate an exemplar sensor-based biofeedback system, investigating the feasibility, usability, perceived impact and user experience of using the platform. Fifteen patients participated in the study having recently undergone knee replacement surgery. Participants were provided with the system for two weeks at home, completing a semi-structured interview alongside the System Usability Scale (SUS) and user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). The analysis from the SUS (mean = 90.8 [SD = 7.8]) suggests a high degree of usability, supported by qualitative findings. The mean adherence rate was 79% with participants reporting a largely positive user experience, suggesting it offers additional support with the rehabilitation regime. Overall quality from the mean uMARS score was 4.1 out of 5 (SD = 0.39), however a number of bugs and inaccuracies were highlighted along with suggestions for additional features to enhance engagement. This study has shown that patients perceive value in the use of wearable sensor-based biofeedback systems and has highlighted the benefit of user-evaluation during the design process, illustrated the need for real-world accuracy validation, and supports the ongoing development of such systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6359655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63596552019-02-06 Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System Argent, Rob Slevin, Patrick Bevilacqua, Antonio Neligan, Maurice Daly, Ailish Caulfield, Brian Sensors (Basel) Article The majority of wearable sensor-based biofeedback systems used in exercise rehabilitation lack end-user evaluation as part of the development process. This study sought to evaluate an exemplar sensor-based biofeedback system, investigating the feasibility, usability, perceived impact and user experience of using the platform. Fifteen patients participated in the study having recently undergone knee replacement surgery. Participants were provided with the system for two weeks at home, completing a semi-structured interview alongside the System Usability Scale (SUS) and user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). The analysis from the SUS (mean = 90.8 [SD = 7.8]) suggests a high degree of usability, supported by qualitative findings. The mean adherence rate was 79% with participants reporting a largely positive user experience, suggesting it offers additional support with the rehabilitation regime. Overall quality from the mean uMARS score was 4.1 out of 5 (SD = 0.39), however a number of bugs and inaccuracies were highlighted along with suggestions for additional features to enhance engagement. This study has shown that patients perceive value in the use of wearable sensor-based biofeedback systems and has highlighted the benefit of user-evaluation during the design process, illustrated the need for real-world accuracy validation, and supports the ongoing development of such systems. MDPI 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6359655/ /pubmed/30669657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020432 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Argent, Rob Slevin, Patrick Bevilacqua, Antonio Neligan, Maurice Daly, Ailish Caulfield, Brian Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System |
title | Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System |
title_full | Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System |
title_fullStr | Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System |
title_full_unstemmed | Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System |
title_short | Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System |
title_sort | wearable sensor-based exercise biofeedback for orthopaedic rehabilitation: a mixed methods user evaluation of a prototype system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30669657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT argentrob wearablesensorbasedexercisebiofeedbackfororthopaedicrehabilitationamixedmethodsuserevaluationofaprototypesystem AT slevinpatrick wearablesensorbasedexercisebiofeedbackfororthopaedicrehabilitationamixedmethodsuserevaluationofaprototypesystem AT bevilacquaantonio wearablesensorbasedexercisebiofeedbackfororthopaedicrehabilitationamixedmethodsuserevaluationofaprototypesystem AT neliganmaurice wearablesensorbasedexercisebiofeedbackfororthopaedicrehabilitationamixedmethodsuserevaluationofaprototypesystem AT dalyailish wearablesensorbasedexercisebiofeedbackfororthopaedicrehabilitationamixedmethodsuserevaluationofaprototypesystem AT caulfieldbrian wearablesensorbasedexercisebiofeedbackfororthopaedicrehabilitationamixedmethodsuserevaluationofaprototypesystem |