Cargando…

Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models

OBJECTIVES: To determine the economic impact of three drugs commonly involved in potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in adults aged ≥65 years, including their adverse effects (AEs): long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moriarty, Frank, Cahir, Caitriona, Bennett, Kathleen, Fahey, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30705233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021832
_version_ 1783392336108060672
author Moriarty, Frank
Cahir, Caitriona
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
author_facet Moriarty, Frank
Cahir, Caitriona
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
author_sort Moriarty, Frank
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the economic impact of three drugs commonly involved in potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in adults aged ≥65 years, including their adverse effects (AEs): long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximal dose; to assess cost-effectiveness of potential interventions to reduce PIP of each drug. DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis. We developed Markov models incorporating the AEs of each PIP, populated with published estimates of probabilities, health system costs (in 2014 euro) and utilities. PARTICIPANTS: A hypothetical cohort of 65 year olds analysed over 35 1-year cycles with discounting at 5% per year. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with 95% credible intervals (CIs, generated in probabilistic sensitivity analysis) between each PIP and an appropriate alternative strategy. Models were then used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of potential interventions to reduce PIP for each of the three drug classes. RESULTS: All three PIP drugs and their AEs are associated with greater cost and fewer QALYs compared with alternatives. The largest reduction in QALYs and incremental cost was for benzodiazepines compared with no sedative medication (€3470, 95% CI €2434 to €5001; −0.07 QALYs, 95% CI −0.089 to –0.047), followed by NSAIDs relative to paracetamol (€806, 95% CI €415 and €1346; −0.07 QALYs, 95% CI −0.131 to –0.026), and maximal dose PPIs compared with maintenance dose PPIs (€989, 95% CI -€69 and €2127; −0.01 QALYs, 95% CI −0.029 to 0.003). For interventions to reduce PIP, at a willingness-to-pay of €45 000 per QALY, targeting NSAIDs would be cost-effective up to the highest intervention cost per person of €1971. For benzodiazepine and PPI interventions, the equivalent cost was €1480 and €831, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term benzodiazepine and NSAID prescribing are associated with significantly increased costs and reduced QALYs. Targeting inappropriate NSAID prescribing appears to be the most cost-effective PIP intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63597412019-02-25 Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models Moriarty, Frank Cahir, Caitriona Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: To determine the economic impact of three drugs commonly involved in potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in adults aged ≥65 years, including their adverse effects (AEs): long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximal dose; to assess cost-effectiveness of potential interventions to reduce PIP of each drug. DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis. We developed Markov models incorporating the AEs of each PIP, populated with published estimates of probabilities, health system costs (in 2014 euro) and utilities. PARTICIPANTS: A hypothetical cohort of 65 year olds analysed over 35 1-year cycles with discounting at 5% per year. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with 95% credible intervals (CIs, generated in probabilistic sensitivity analysis) between each PIP and an appropriate alternative strategy. Models were then used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of potential interventions to reduce PIP for each of the three drug classes. RESULTS: All three PIP drugs and their AEs are associated with greater cost and fewer QALYs compared with alternatives. The largest reduction in QALYs and incremental cost was for benzodiazepines compared with no sedative medication (€3470, 95% CI €2434 to €5001; −0.07 QALYs, 95% CI −0.089 to –0.047), followed by NSAIDs relative to paracetamol (€806, 95% CI €415 and €1346; −0.07 QALYs, 95% CI −0.131 to –0.026), and maximal dose PPIs compared with maintenance dose PPIs (€989, 95% CI -€69 and €2127; −0.01 QALYs, 95% CI −0.029 to 0.003). For interventions to reduce PIP, at a willingness-to-pay of €45 000 per QALY, targeting NSAIDs would be cost-effective up to the highest intervention cost per person of €1971. For benzodiazepine and PPI interventions, the equivalent cost was €1480 and €831, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term benzodiazepine and NSAID prescribing are associated with significantly increased costs and reduced QALYs. Targeting inappropriate NSAID prescribing appears to be the most cost-effective PIP intervention. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6359741/ /pubmed/30705233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021832 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Moriarty, Frank
Cahir, Caitriona
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models
title Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models
title_full Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models
title_fullStr Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models
title_full_unstemmed Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models
title_short Economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using Markov models
title_sort economic impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing and related adverse events in older people: a cost-utility analysis using markov models
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30705233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021832
work_keys_str_mv AT moriartyfrank economicimpactofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingandrelatedadverseeventsinolderpeopleacostutilityanalysisusingmarkovmodels
AT cahircaitriona economicimpactofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingandrelatedadverseeventsinolderpeopleacostutilityanalysisusingmarkovmodels
AT bennettkathleen economicimpactofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingandrelatedadverseeventsinolderpeopleacostutilityanalysisusingmarkovmodels
AT faheytom economicimpactofpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingandrelatedadverseeventsinolderpeopleacostutilityanalysisusingmarkovmodels