Cargando…

Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor

BACKGROUND: There is a need for alternative treatment options for tremor patients who do not respond well to medications or surgery, either due to side effects or poor efficacy, or that are excluded from surgery. The study aims to evaluate feasibility of a voluntary-driven, speed-controlled tremor r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrnstadt, Gil, McKeown, Martin J., Menon, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0484-1
_version_ 1783392341604696064
author Herrnstadt, Gil
McKeown, Martin J.
Menon, Carlo
author_facet Herrnstadt, Gil
McKeown, Martin J.
Menon, Carlo
author_sort Herrnstadt, Gil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for alternative treatment options for tremor patients who do not respond well to medications or surgery, either due to side effects or poor efficacy, or that are excluded from surgery. The study aims to evaluate feasibility of a voluntary-driven, speed-controlled tremor rejection approach with individuals with pathological tremor. The suppression approach was investigated using a robotic orthosis for suppression of elbow tremor. Importantly, the study emphasizes the performance in relation to the voluntary motion. METHODS: Nine participants with either Essential Tremor (ET) or Parkinson’s disease (PD) were recruited and tested off medication. The participants performed computerized pursuit tracking tasks following a sinusoid and a random target, both with and without the suppressive orthosis. The impact of the Tremor Suppression Orthosis (TSO) at the tremor and voluntary frequencies was determined by the relative power change calculated from the Power Spectral Density (PSD). Voluntary motion was, in addition, assessed by position and velocity tracking errors. RESULTS: The suppressive orthosis resulted in a 94.4% mean power reduction of the tremor (p < 0.001) – a substantial improvement over reports in the literature. As for the impact to the voluntary motion, paired difference tests revealed no statistical effect of the TSO on the relative power change (p = 0.346) and velocity tracking error (p = 0.283). A marginal effect was observed for the position tracking error (p = 0.05). The interaction torque with the robotic orthosis was small (0.62 Nm) when compared to the maximum voluntary torque that can be exerted by adult individuals at the elbow joint. CONCLUSIONS: Two key contributions of this work are first, a recently proposed approach is evaluated with individuals with tremor demonstrating high levels of tremor suppression; second, the impact of the approach to the voluntary motion is analyzed comprehensively, showing limited inhibition. This study also seeks to address a gap in studies with individuals with tremor where the impact of engineering solutions on voluntary motion is unreported. This study demonstrates feasibility of the wearable technology as an effective treatment that removes tremor with limited impediment to intentional motion. The goal for such wearable technology is to help individuals with pathological tremor regain independence in activities affected by the tremor condition. Further investigations are needed to validate the technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63597632019-02-07 Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor Herrnstadt, Gil McKeown, Martin J. Menon, Carlo J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: There is a need for alternative treatment options for tremor patients who do not respond well to medications or surgery, either due to side effects or poor efficacy, or that are excluded from surgery. The study aims to evaluate feasibility of a voluntary-driven, speed-controlled tremor rejection approach with individuals with pathological tremor. The suppression approach was investigated using a robotic orthosis for suppression of elbow tremor. Importantly, the study emphasizes the performance in relation to the voluntary motion. METHODS: Nine participants with either Essential Tremor (ET) or Parkinson’s disease (PD) were recruited and tested off medication. The participants performed computerized pursuit tracking tasks following a sinusoid and a random target, both with and without the suppressive orthosis. The impact of the Tremor Suppression Orthosis (TSO) at the tremor and voluntary frequencies was determined by the relative power change calculated from the Power Spectral Density (PSD). Voluntary motion was, in addition, assessed by position and velocity tracking errors. RESULTS: The suppressive orthosis resulted in a 94.4% mean power reduction of the tremor (p < 0.001) – a substantial improvement over reports in the literature. As for the impact to the voluntary motion, paired difference tests revealed no statistical effect of the TSO on the relative power change (p = 0.346) and velocity tracking error (p = 0.283). A marginal effect was observed for the position tracking error (p = 0.05). The interaction torque with the robotic orthosis was small (0.62 Nm) when compared to the maximum voluntary torque that can be exerted by adult individuals at the elbow joint. CONCLUSIONS: Two key contributions of this work are first, a recently proposed approach is evaluated with individuals with tremor demonstrating high levels of tremor suppression; second, the impact of the approach to the voluntary motion is analyzed comprehensively, showing limited inhibition. This study also seeks to address a gap in studies with individuals with tremor where the impact of engineering solutions on voluntary motion is unreported. This study demonstrates feasibility of the wearable technology as an effective treatment that removes tremor with limited impediment to intentional motion. The goal for such wearable technology is to help individuals with pathological tremor regain independence in activities affected by the tremor condition. Further investigations are needed to validate the technology. BioMed Central 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6359763/ /pubmed/30709409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0484-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Herrnstadt, Gil
McKeown, Martin J.
Menon, Carlo
Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor
title Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor
title_full Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor
title_fullStr Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor
title_full_unstemmed Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor
title_short Controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor
title_sort controlling a motorized orthosis to follow elbow volitional movement: tests with individuals with pathological tremor
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0484-1
work_keys_str_mv AT herrnstadtgil controllingamotorizedorthosistofollowelbowvolitionalmovementtestswithindividualswithpathologicaltremor
AT mckeownmartinj controllingamotorizedorthosistofollowelbowvolitionalmovementtestswithindividualswithpathologicaltremor
AT menoncarlo controllingamotorizedorthosistofollowelbowvolitionalmovementtestswithindividualswithpathologicaltremor