Cargando…

Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting. BACKGROUND: Evidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people’s experiences and associated social processes. Meta-et...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: France, Emma F., Cunningham, Maggie, Ring, Nicola, Uny, Isabelle, Duncan, Edward A. S., Jepson, Ruth G., Maxwell, Margaret, Roberts, Rachel J., Turley, Ruth L., Booth, Andrew, Britten, Nicky, Flemming, Kate, Gallagher, Ian, Garside, Ruth, Hannes, Karin, Lewin, Simon, Noblit, George W., Pope, Catherine, Thomas, James, Vanstone, Meredith, Higginbottom, Gina M. A., Noyes, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0
_version_ 1783392341880471552
author France, Emma F.
Cunningham, Maggie
Ring, Nicola
Uny, Isabelle
Duncan, Edward A. S.
Jepson, Ruth G.
Maxwell, Margaret
Roberts, Rachel J.
Turley, Ruth L.
Booth, Andrew
Britten, Nicky
Flemming, Kate
Gallagher, Ian
Garside, Ruth
Hannes, Karin
Lewin, Simon
Noblit, George W.
Pope, Catherine
Thomas, James
Vanstone, Meredith
Higginbottom, Gina M. A.
Noyes, Jane
author_facet France, Emma F.
Cunningham, Maggie
Ring, Nicola
Uny, Isabelle
Duncan, Edward A. S.
Jepson, Ruth G.
Maxwell, Margaret
Roberts, Rachel J.
Turley, Ruth L.
Booth, Andrew
Britten, Nicky
Flemming, Kate
Gallagher, Ian
Garside, Ruth
Hannes, Karin
Lewin, Simon
Noblit, George W.
Pope, Catherine
Thomas, James
Vanstone, Meredith
Higginbottom, Gina M. A.
Noyes, Jane
author_sort France, Emma F.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting. BACKGROUND: Evidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people’s experiences and associated social processes. Meta-ethnography is a rigorous seven-phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta-ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta-ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality. DESIGN: The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed-methods design and evidence-based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes. METHODS: The study, conducted from 2015 to 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta-ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta-ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus-building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes. FINDINGS: Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta-ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance. CONCLUSION: The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta-ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta-ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta-ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho-oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63597642019-02-07 Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance France, Emma F. Cunningham, Maggie Ring, Nicola Uny, Isabelle Duncan, Edward A. S. Jepson, Ruth G. Maxwell, Margaret Roberts, Rachel J. Turley, Ruth L. Booth, Andrew Britten, Nicky Flemming, Kate Gallagher, Ian Garside, Ruth Hannes, Karin Lewin, Simon Noblit, George W. Pope, Catherine Thomas, James Vanstone, Meredith Higginbottom, Gina M. A. Noyes, Jane BMC Med Res Methodol Research AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting. BACKGROUND: Evidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people’s experiences and associated social processes. Meta-ethnography is a rigorous seven-phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta-ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta-ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality. DESIGN: The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed-methods design and evidence-based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes. METHODS: The study, conducted from 2015 to 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta-ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta-ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus-building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes. FINDINGS: Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta-ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance. CONCLUSION: The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta-ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta-ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta-ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho-oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6359764/ /pubmed/30709371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
France, Emma F.
Cunningham, Maggie
Ring, Nicola
Uny, Isabelle
Duncan, Edward A. S.
Jepson, Ruth G.
Maxwell, Margaret
Roberts, Rachel J.
Turley, Ruth L.
Booth, Andrew
Britten, Nicky
Flemming, Kate
Gallagher, Ian
Garside, Ruth
Hannes, Karin
Lewin, Simon
Noblit, George W.
Pope, Catherine
Thomas, James
Vanstone, Meredith
Higginbottom, Gina M. A.
Noyes, Jane
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
title Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
title_full Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
title_fullStr Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
title_full_unstemmed Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
title_short Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
title_sort improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the emerge reporting guidance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0
work_keys_str_mv AT franceemmaf improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT cunninghammaggie improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT ringnicola improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT unyisabelle improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT duncanedwardas improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT jepsonruthg improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT maxwellmargaret improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT robertsrachelj improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT turleyruthl improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT boothandrew improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT brittennicky improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT flemmingkate improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT gallagherian improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT garsideruth improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT hanneskarin improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT lewinsimon improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT noblitgeorgew improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT popecatherine improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT thomasjames improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT vanstonemeredith improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT higginbottomginama improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT noyesjane improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance