Cargando…

Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study

BACKGROUND: Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians managing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gudmundsson, Haukur T., Hansen, Karen E., Halldorsson, Bjarni V., Ludviksson, Bjorn R., Gudbjornsson, Bjorn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4
_version_ 1783392366948777984
author Gudmundsson, Haukur T.
Hansen, Karen E.
Halldorsson, Bjarni V.
Ludviksson, Bjorn R.
Gudbjornsson, Bjorn
author_facet Gudmundsson, Haukur T.
Hansen, Karen E.
Halldorsson, Bjarni V.
Ludviksson, Bjorn R.
Gudbjornsson, Bjorn
author_sort Gudmundsson, Haukur T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians managing osteoporosis at the point-of-care. The present study compares the treatment recommendations provided by OPAD, an expert physician and the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 259 patients attending the outpatient osteoporosis clinic at the University Hospital in Iceland. We entered each patient’s data into the OPAD and recorded the OPAD diagnostic comments, 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and treatment options. We compared OPAD recommendations to those given by the osteoporosis specialist, and to those of the NOGG. RESULTS: Risk estimates made by OPAD were highly correlated with those from FRAX (r = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99, 1.00 without femoral neck BMD; r = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97, 0.99 with femoral neck BMD. Reassurance was recommended by the expert, NOGG and the OPAD in 68, 63 and 52% of cases, respectively. Likewise, intervention was recommended by the expert, NOGG, and the OPAD in 32, 37 and 48% of cases, respectively. The OPAD demonstrated moderate agreement with the physician (kappa 0.51, 95% CI 0.41, 0.61) and even higher agreement with NOGG (kappa 0.69, 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians can use the OPAD to assess and treat patients’ skeletal health. Recommendations given by OPAD are consistent with expert opinion and existing guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63598362019-02-07 Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study Gudmundsson, Haukur T. Hansen, Karen E. Halldorsson, Bjarni V. Ludviksson, Bjorn R. Gudbjornsson, Bjorn BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Although osteoporosis is an easily diagnosed and treatable condition, many individuals remain untreated. Clinical decision support systems might increase appropriate treatment of osteoporosis. We designed the Osteoporosis Advisor (OPAD), a computerized tool to support physicians managing osteoporosis at the point-of-care. The present study compares the treatment recommendations provided by OPAD, an expert physician and the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 259 patients attending the outpatient osteoporosis clinic at the University Hospital in Iceland. We entered each patient’s data into the OPAD and recorded the OPAD diagnostic comments, 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and treatment options. We compared OPAD recommendations to those given by the osteoporosis specialist, and to those of the NOGG. RESULTS: Risk estimates made by OPAD were highly correlated with those from FRAX (r = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99, 1.00 without femoral neck BMD; r = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97, 0.99 with femoral neck BMD. Reassurance was recommended by the expert, NOGG and the OPAD in 68, 63 and 52% of cases, respectively. Likewise, intervention was recommended by the expert, NOGG, and the OPAD in 32, 37 and 48% of cases, respectively. The OPAD demonstrated moderate agreement with the physician (kappa 0.51, 95% CI 0.41, 0.61) and even higher agreement with NOGG (kappa 0.69, 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians can use the OPAD to assess and treat patients’ skeletal health. Recommendations given by OPAD are consistent with expert opinion and existing guidelines. BioMed Central 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6359836/ /pubmed/30709348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gudmundsson, Haukur T.
Hansen, Karen E.
Halldorsson, Bjarni V.
Ludviksson, Bjorn R.
Gudbjornsson, Bjorn
Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_full Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_fullStr Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_short Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
title_sort clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to nogg guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gudmundssonhaukurt clinicaldecisionsupportsystemforthemanagementofosteoporosiscomparedtonoggguidelinesandanosteologyspecialistavalidationpilotstudy
AT hansenkarene clinicaldecisionsupportsystemforthemanagementofosteoporosiscomparedtonoggguidelinesandanosteologyspecialistavalidationpilotstudy
AT halldorssonbjarniv clinicaldecisionsupportsystemforthemanagementofosteoporosiscomparedtonoggguidelinesandanosteologyspecialistavalidationpilotstudy
AT ludvikssonbjornr clinicaldecisionsupportsystemforthemanagementofosteoporosiscomparedtonoggguidelinesandanosteologyspecialistavalidationpilotstudy
AT gudbjornssonbjorn clinicaldecisionsupportsystemforthemanagementofosteoporosiscomparedtonoggguidelinesandanosteologyspecialistavalidationpilotstudy