Cargando…

Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers

BACKGROUND: In eukaryotic cells, transcription factors (TFs) are thought to act in a combinatorial way, by competing and collaborating to regulate common target genes. However, several questions remain regarding the conservation of these combinations among different gene classes, regulatory regions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vandel, Jimmy, Cassan, Océane, Lèbre, Sophie, Lecellier, Charles-Henri, Bréhélin, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5408-0
_version_ 1783392370831654912
author Vandel, Jimmy
Cassan, Océane
Lèbre, Sophie
Lecellier, Charles-Henri
Bréhélin, Laurent
author_facet Vandel, Jimmy
Cassan, Océane
Lèbre, Sophie
Lecellier, Charles-Henri
Bréhélin, Laurent
author_sort Vandel, Jimmy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In eukaryotic cells, transcription factors (TFs) are thought to act in a combinatorial way, by competing and collaborating to regulate common target genes. However, several questions remain regarding the conservation of these combinations among different gene classes, regulatory regions and cell types. RESULTS: We propose a new approach named TFcoop to infer the TF combinations involved in the binding of a target TF in a particular cell type. TFcoop aims to predict the binding sites of the target TF upon the nucleotide content of the sequences and of the binding affinity of all identified cooperating TFs. The set of cooperating TFs and model parameters are learned from ChIP-seq data of the target TF. We used TFcoop to investigate the TF combinations involved in the binding of 106 TFs on 41 cell types and in four regulatory regions: promoters of mRNAs, lncRNAs and pri-miRNAs, and enhancers. We first assess that TFcoop is accurate and outperforms simple PWM methods for predicting TF binding sites. Next, analysis of the learned models sheds light on important properties of TF combinations in different promoter classes and in enhancers. First, we show that combinations governing TF binding on enhancers are more cell-type specific than that governing binding in promoters. Second, for a given TF and cell type, we observe that TF combinations are different between promoters and enhancers, but similar for promoters of mRNAs, lncRNAs and pri-miRNAs. Analysis of the TFs cooperating with the different targets show over-representation of pioneer TFs and a clear preference for TFs with binding motif composition similar to that of the target. Lastly, our models accurately distinguish promoters associated with specific biological processes. CONCLUSIONS: TFcoop appears as an accurate approach for studying TF combinations. Its use on ENCODE and FANTOM data allowed us to discover important properties of human TF combinations in different promoter classes and in enhancers. The R code for learning a TFcoop model and for reproducing the main experiments described in the paper is available in an R Markdown file at address https://gite.lirmm.fr/brehelin/TFcoop. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5408-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6359851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63598512019-02-07 Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers Vandel, Jimmy Cassan, Océane Lèbre, Sophie Lecellier, Charles-Henri Bréhélin, Laurent BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: In eukaryotic cells, transcription factors (TFs) are thought to act in a combinatorial way, by competing and collaborating to regulate common target genes. However, several questions remain regarding the conservation of these combinations among different gene classes, regulatory regions and cell types. RESULTS: We propose a new approach named TFcoop to infer the TF combinations involved in the binding of a target TF in a particular cell type. TFcoop aims to predict the binding sites of the target TF upon the nucleotide content of the sequences and of the binding affinity of all identified cooperating TFs. The set of cooperating TFs and model parameters are learned from ChIP-seq data of the target TF. We used TFcoop to investigate the TF combinations involved in the binding of 106 TFs on 41 cell types and in four regulatory regions: promoters of mRNAs, lncRNAs and pri-miRNAs, and enhancers. We first assess that TFcoop is accurate and outperforms simple PWM methods for predicting TF binding sites. Next, analysis of the learned models sheds light on important properties of TF combinations in different promoter classes and in enhancers. First, we show that combinations governing TF binding on enhancers are more cell-type specific than that governing binding in promoters. Second, for a given TF and cell type, we observe that TF combinations are different between promoters and enhancers, but similar for promoters of mRNAs, lncRNAs and pri-miRNAs. Analysis of the TFs cooperating with the different targets show over-representation of pioneer TFs and a clear preference for TFs with binding motif composition similar to that of the target. Lastly, our models accurately distinguish promoters associated with specific biological processes. CONCLUSIONS: TFcoop appears as an accurate approach for studying TF combinations. Its use on ENCODE and FANTOM data allowed us to discover important properties of human TF combinations in different promoter classes and in enhancers. The R code for learning a TFcoop model and for reproducing the main experiments described in the paper is available in an R Markdown file at address https://gite.lirmm.fr/brehelin/TFcoop. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5408-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6359851/ /pubmed/30709337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5408-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Vandel, Jimmy
Cassan, Océane
Lèbre, Sophie
Lecellier, Charles-Henri
Bréhélin, Laurent
Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
title Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
title_full Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
title_fullStr Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
title_full_unstemmed Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
title_short Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
title_sort probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30709337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5408-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeljimmy probingtranscriptionfactorcombinatoricsindifferentpromoterclassesandinenhancers
AT cassanoceane probingtranscriptionfactorcombinatoricsindifferentpromoterclassesandinenhancers
AT lebresophie probingtranscriptionfactorcombinatoricsindifferentpromoterclassesandinenhancers
AT lecelliercharleshenri probingtranscriptionfactorcombinatoricsindifferentpromoterclassesandinenhancers
AT brehelinlaurent probingtranscriptionfactorcombinatoricsindifferentpromoterclassesandinenhancers