Cargando…

Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants

Metacognition about face recognition has been much discussed in the psychological literature. In particular, the use of self-report to identify people with prosopagnosia (“face blindness”) has contentiously been debated. However, no study to date has specifically assessed metacognition at the top en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bate, Sarah, Dudfield, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723622
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6330
_version_ 1783392404761477120
author Bate, Sarah
Dudfield, Gavin
author_facet Bate, Sarah
Dudfield, Gavin
author_sort Bate, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Metacognition about face recognition has been much discussed in the psychological literature. In particular, the use of self-report to identify people with prosopagnosia (“face blindness”) has contentiously been debated. However, no study to date has specifically assessed metacognition at the top end of the spectrum. If people with exceptionally proficient face recognition skills (“super-recognizers,” SRs) have greater insight into their abilities, self-report instruments may offer an efficient means of reducing candidate lists in SR screening programs. Here, we developed a “super-recognizer questionnaire” (SRQ), calibrated using a top-end civilian sample (Experiment 1). We examined its effectiveness in identifying SRs in pools of police (Experiment 2) and civilian (Experiment 3) participants, using objective face memory and matching tests. Moderate effect sizes in both samples suggest limited insight into face memory and target-present face matching ability, whereas the only predictor of target-absent matching performance across all samples was the number of years that an officer had been in the police force. Because the SRQ and single-item ratings showed little sensitivity in discriminating SRs from typical perceivers in police officers and civilians, we recommend against the use of self-report instruments in SR screening programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63600752019-02-05 Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants Bate, Sarah Dudfield, Gavin PeerJ Neuroscience Metacognition about face recognition has been much discussed in the psychological literature. In particular, the use of self-report to identify people with prosopagnosia (“face blindness”) has contentiously been debated. However, no study to date has specifically assessed metacognition at the top end of the spectrum. If people with exceptionally proficient face recognition skills (“super-recognizers,” SRs) have greater insight into their abilities, self-report instruments may offer an efficient means of reducing candidate lists in SR screening programs. Here, we developed a “super-recognizer questionnaire” (SRQ), calibrated using a top-end civilian sample (Experiment 1). We examined its effectiveness in identifying SRs in pools of police (Experiment 2) and civilian (Experiment 3) participants, using objective face memory and matching tests. Moderate effect sizes in both samples suggest limited insight into face memory and target-present face matching ability, whereas the only predictor of target-absent matching performance across all samples was the number of years that an officer had been in the police force. Because the SRQ and single-item ratings showed little sensitivity in discriminating SRs from typical perceivers in police officers and civilians, we recommend against the use of self-report instruments in SR screening programs. PeerJ Inc. 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6360075/ /pubmed/30723622 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6330 Text en © 2019 Bate and Dudfield http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bate, Sarah
Dudfield, Gavin
Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
title Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
title_full Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
title_fullStr Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
title_full_unstemmed Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
title_short Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
title_sort subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723622
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6330
work_keys_str_mv AT batesarah subjectiveassessmentforsuperrecognitionanevaluationofselfreportmethodsincivilianandpoliceparticipants
AT dudfieldgavin subjectiveassessmentforsuperrecognitionanevaluationofselfreportmethodsincivilianandpoliceparticipants