Cargando…
Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants
Metacognition about face recognition has been much discussed in the psychological literature. In particular, the use of self-report to identify people with prosopagnosia (“face blindness”) has contentiously been debated. However, no study to date has specifically assessed metacognition at the top en...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723622 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6330 |
_version_ | 1783392404761477120 |
---|---|
author | Bate, Sarah Dudfield, Gavin |
author_facet | Bate, Sarah Dudfield, Gavin |
author_sort | Bate, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metacognition about face recognition has been much discussed in the psychological literature. In particular, the use of self-report to identify people with prosopagnosia (“face blindness”) has contentiously been debated. However, no study to date has specifically assessed metacognition at the top end of the spectrum. If people with exceptionally proficient face recognition skills (“super-recognizers,” SRs) have greater insight into their abilities, self-report instruments may offer an efficient means of reducing candidate lists in SR screening programs. Here, we developed a “super-recognizer questionnaire” (SRQ), calibrated using a top-end civilian sample (Experiment 1). We examined its effectiveness in identifying SRs in pools of police (Experiment 2) and civilian (Experiment 3) participants, using objective face memory and matching tests. Moderate effect sizes in both samples suggest limited insight into face memory and target-present face matching ability, whereas the only predictor of target-absent matching performance across all samples was the number of years that an officer had been in the police force. Because the SRQ and single-item ratings showed little sensitivity in discriminating SRs from typical perceivers in police officers and civilians, we recommend against the use of self-report instruments in SR screening programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6360075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63600752019-02-05 Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants Bate, Sarah Dudfield, Gavin PeerJ Neuroscience Metacognition about face recognition has been much discussed in the psychological literature. In particular, the use of self-report to identify people with prosopagnosia (“face blindness”) has contentiously been debated. However, no study to date has specifically assessed metacognition at the top end of the spectrum. If people with exceptionally proficient face recognition skills (“super-recognizers,” SRs) have greater insight into their abilities, self-report instruments may offer an efficient means of reducing candidate lists in SR screening programs. Here, we developed a “super-recognizer questionnaire” (SRQ), calibrated using a top-end civilian sample (Experiment 1). We examined its effectiveness in identifying SRs in pools of police (Experiment 2) and civilian (Experiment 3) participants, using objective face memory and matching tests. Moderate effect sizes in both samples suggest limited insight into face memory and target-present face matching ability, whereas the only predictor of target-absent matching performance across all samples was the number of years that an officer had been in the police force. Because the SRQ and single-item ratings showed little sensitivity in discriminating SRs from typical perceivers in police officers and civilians, we recommend against the use of self-report instruments in SR screening programs. PeerJ Inc. 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6360075/ /pubmed/30723622 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6330 Text en © 2019 Bate and Dudfield http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Bate, Sarah Dudfield, Gavin Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants |
title | Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants |
title_full | Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants |
title_fullStr | Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants |
title_full_unstemmed | Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants |
title_short | Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants |
title_sort | subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723622 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT batesarah subjectiveassessmentforsuperrecognitionanevaluationofselfreportmethodsincivilianandpoliceparticipants AT dudfieldgavin subjectiveassessmentforsuperrecognitionanevaluationofselfreportmethodsincivilianandpoliceparticipants |