Cargando…

Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention

BACKGROUND: Text message (short message service, SMS) interrogative reminders were adopted in population screening for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine responses to text message (SMS) reminders and associate responses with senders’ characteristics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagoel, Lea, Stein, Nili, Rennert, Gad, Neter, Efrat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30664486
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9351
_version_ 1783392471367024640
author Hagoel, Lea
Stein, Nili
Rennert, Gad
Neter, Efrat
author_facet Hagoel, Lea
Stein, Nili
Rennert, Gad
Neter, Efrat
author_sort Hagoel, Lea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Text message (short message service, SMS) interrogative reminders were adopted in population screening for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine responses to text message (SMS) reminders and associate responses with senders’ characteristics, message type (interrogative/declarative), and subsequent screening uptake. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort intervention. Text message (SMS) reminders to undergo CRC screening, randomized into interrogative and declarative phrasing, were sent to nonadherent 40,000 women and men (age 50-74 years) at CRC average risk. We analyzed recipient responses by message phrasing, recipient characteristics, and for content, the latter predicting subsequent CRC screening per program database. RESULTS: While interrogative text message (SMS) reminders elicited 7.67% (1475/19,227) responses, declarative ones elicited 0.76% (146/19,262) responses. Text message (SMS) responses were content analyzed and grouped into attitudes toward CRC screening (1237/1512, 81.8% positive) and intention to screen (1004/1512, 62.6%). Text message (SMS) respondents screened significantly more than nonrespondents after 6 months (415/1621, 25.6% vs 3322/36,868, 9.0%; χ12=487.5, P<.001); 1 year (340/1621, 21.0% vs 4711/36,868; χ12=91.5, P<.001); and 2 years (225/1621, 13.9% vs 3924/36,868; χ12=16.9, P<.001) following the reminders. In a multivariable logistic regression among text message (SMS) respondents, screening after 6 months was significantly predicted by older age, past sporadic screening, attitudes, and intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Interrogative text message (SMS) reminders reached previously uninvolved sectors in the CRC target population—men, sporadic-screenees, and the “never-tested” before. This novel application resulted in a population-level, incrementally enhanced screening. Asking patients about their future health behavior may be relevant for enhancing other health behaviors in preventive medicine and clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63603822019-02-22 Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention Hagoel, Lea Stein, Nili Rennert, Gad Neter, Efrat JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Text message (short message service, SMS) interrogative reminders were adopted in population screening for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine responses to text message (SMS) reminders and associate responses with senders’ characteristics, message type (interrogative/declarative), and subsequent screening uptake. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort intervention. Text message (SMS) reminders to undergo CRC screening, randomized into interrogative and declarative phrasing, were sent to nonadherent 40,000 women and men (age 50-74 years) at CRC average risk. We analyzed recipient responses by message phrasing, recipient characteristics, and for content, the latter predicting subsequent CRC screening per program database. RESULTS: While interrogative text message (SMS) reminders elicited 7.67% (1475/19,227) responses, declarative ones elicited 0.76% (146/19,262) responses. Text message (SMS) responses were content analyzed and grouped into attitudes toward CRC screening (1237/1512, 81.8% positive) and intention to screen (1004/1512, 62.6%). Text message (SMS) respondents screened significantly more than nonrespondents after 6 months (415/1621, 25.6% vs 3322/36,868, 9.0%; χ12=487.5, P<.001); 1 year (340/1621, 21.0% vs 4711/36,868; χ12=91.5, P<.001); and 2 years (225/1621, 13.9% vs 3924/36,868; χ12=16.9, P<.001) following the reminders. In a multivariable logistic regression among text message (SMS) respondents, screening after 6 months was significantly predicted by older age, past sporadic screening, attitudes, and intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Interrogative text message (SMS) reminders reached previously uninvolved sectors in the CRC target population—men, sporadic-screenees, and the “never-tested” before. This novel application resulted in a population-level, incrementally enhanced screening. Asking patients about their future health behavior may be relevant for enhancing other health behaviors in preventive medicine and clinical settings. JMIR Publications 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6360382/ /pubmed/30664486 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9351 Text en ©Lea Hagoel, Nili Stein, Gad Rennert, Efrat Neter. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 21.01.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hagoel, Lea
Stein, Nili
Rennert, Gad
Neter, Efrat
Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention
title Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention
title_full Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention
title_fullStr Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention
title_short Better Ask Than Tell: Responses to mHealth Interrogative Reminders and Associations With Colorectal Cancer Screening Subsequent Uptake in a Prospective Cohort Intervention
title_sort better ask than tell: responses to mhealth interrogative reminders and associations with colorectal cancer screening subsequent uptake in a prospective cohort intervention
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30664486
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9351
work_keys_str_mv AT hagoellea betteraskthantellresponsestomhealthinterrogativeremindersandassociationswithcolorectalcancerscreeningsubsequentuptakeinaprospectivecohortintervention
AT steinnili betteraskthantellresponsestomhealthinterrogativeremindersandassociationswithcolorectalcancerscreeningsubsequentuptakeinaprospectivecohortintervention
AT rennertgad betteraskthantellresponsestomhealthinterrogativeremindersandassociationswithcolorectalcancerscreeningsubsequentuptakeinaprospectivecohortintervention
AT neterefrat betteraskthantellresponsestomhealthinterrogativeremindersandassociationswithcolorectalcancerscreeningsubsequentuptakeinaprospectivecohortintervention