Cargando…

Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer

Background: Mounting evidence has indicated that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are promising candidates for tumor diagnosis and prognosis. Nonetheless, the significance of lncRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis remains to be clarified. Here, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Juan, Zuo, Xueliang, Chen, Zhiqiang, Zhang, Yao, Wang, Jinguo, Wang, Junfeng, Ye, Xiaobing, Zhao, Wenying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719158
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.28780
_version_ 1783392484180623360
author Cai, Juan
Zuo, Xueliang
Chen, Zhiqiang
Zhang, Yao
Wang, Jinguo
Wang, Junfeng
Ye, Xiaobing
Zhao, Wenying
author_facet Cai, Juan
Zuo, Xueliang
Chen, Zhiqiang
Zhang, Yao
Wang, Jinguo
Wang, Junfeng
Ye, Xiaobing
Zhao, Wenying
author_sort Cai, Juan
collection PubMed
description Background: Mounting evidence has indicated that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are promising candidates for tumor diagnosis and prognosis. Nonetheless, the significance of lncRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis remains to be clarified. Here, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the utility of lncRNAs as diagnostic indicators for CRC. Materials and Methods: Pertinent studies were searched using PubMed, PMC, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EMBASE database up to September 2018. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2. Subgroup analyses by sample size and publication year were conducted. Threshold effect and meta-regression were performed to find the origin of heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata and Meta-Disc. Results: A total of 19 studies with 3,114 individuals were enrolled in the current analysis. The overall sensitivity and specificity of lncRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.87] and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 5.11 (95% CI: 3.57-7.31), and the pooled negative likelihood ratio was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.15-0.28). The overall area under the curve was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 24.57 (95% CI: 14.67-41.17). Conclusions: The accuracy of lncRNAs for CRC diagnosis is high, and lncRNAs could be functioned as promising candidates for CRC diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63604352019-02-04 Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Cai, Juan Zuo, Xueliang Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Yao Wang, Jinguo Wang, Junfeng Ye, Xiaobing Zhao, Wenying J Cancer Research Paper Background: Mounting evidence has indicated that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are promising candidates for tumor diagnosis and prognosis. Nonetheless, the significance of lncRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis remains to be clarified. Here, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the utility of lncRNAs as diagnostic indicators for CRC. Materials and Methods: Pertinent studies were searched using PubMed, PMC, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EMBASE database up to September 2018. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2. Subgroup analyses by sample size and publication year were conducted. Threshold effect and meta-regression were performed to find the origin of heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata and Meta-Disc. Results: A total of 19 studies with 3,114 individuals were enrolled in the current analysis. The overall sensitivity and specificity of lncRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.87] and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 5.11 (95% CI: 3.57-7.31), and the pooled negative likelihood ratio was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.15-0.28). The overall area under the curve was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 24.57 (95% CI: 14.67-41.17). Conclusions: The accuracy of lncRNAs for CRC diagnosis is high, and lncRNAs could be functioned as promising candidates for CRC diagnosis. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6360435/ /pubmed/30719158 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.28780 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cai, Juan
Zuo, Xueliang
Chen, Zhiqiang
Zhang, Yao
Wang, Jinguo
Wang, Junfeng
Ye, Xiaobing
Zhao, Wenying
Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer
title Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer
title_full Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer
title_fullStr Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer
title_short Long Noncoding RNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer
title_sort long noncoding rnas serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719158
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.28780
work_keys_str_mv AT caijuan longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer
AT zuoxueliang longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer
AT chenzhiqiang longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer
AT zhangyao longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer
AT wangjinguo longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer
AT wangjunfeng longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer
AT yexiaobing longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer
AT zhaowenying longnoncodingrnasserveaspotentialdiagnosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancer