Cargando…

The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material

The aim of the present study was to (a) assess the reliability with which indecent images of children (IIOC) are classified as being of an indecent versus nonindecent nature, and (b) examine in detail the decision-making process engaged in by law enforcement personnel who undertake the difficult tas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kloess, Juliane A., Woodhams, Jessica, Whittle, Helen, Grant, Tim, Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724768
_version_ 1783392494181941248
author Kloess, Juliane A.
Woodhams, Jessica
Whittle, Helen
Grant, Tim
Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E.
author_facet Kloess, Juliane A.
Woodhams, Jessica
Whittle, Helen
Grant, Tim
Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E.
author_sort Kloess, Juliane A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to (a) assess the reliability with which indecent images of children (IIOC) are classified as being of an indecent versus nonindecent nature, and (b) examine in detail the decision-making process engaged in by law enforcement personnel who undertake the difficult task of identifying and classifying IIOC as per the current legislative offense categories. One experienced researcher and four employees from a police force in the United Kingdom coded an extensive amount of IIOC (n = 1,212-2,233) to determine if they (a) were deemed to be of an indecent nature, and (b) depicted a child. Interrater reliability analyses revealed both considerable agreement and disagreement across coders, which were followed up with two focus groups involving the four employees. The first entailed a general discussion of the aspects that made such material more or less difficult to identify; the second focused around images where there had been either agreement (n = 20) or disagreement (n = 36) across coders that the images were of an indecent nature. Using thematic analysis, a number of factors apparent within IIOC were revealed to make the determination of youthfulness and indecency significantly more challenging for coders, with most relating to the developmental stage of the victim and the ambiguity of the context of an image. Findings are discussed in light of their implications for the identification of victims of ongoing sexual exploitation/abuse, the assessment and treatment of individuals in possession of IIOC, as well as the practice of policing and sentencing this type of offending behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63604832019-02-20 The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material Kloess, Juliane A. Woodhams, Jessica Whittle, Helen Grant, Tim Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E. Sex Abuse Articles The aim of the present study was to (a) assess the reliability with which indecent images of children (IIOC) are classified as being of an indecent versus nonindecent nature, and (b) examine in detail the decision-making process engaged in by law enforcement personnel who undertake the difficult task of identifying and classifying IIOC as per the current legislative offense categories. One experienced researcher and four employees from a police force in the United Kingdom coded an extensive amount of IIOC (n = 1,212-2,233) to determine if they (a) were deemed to be of an indecent nature, and (b) depicted a child. Interrater reliability analyses revealed both considerable agreement and disagreement across coders, which were followed up with two focus groups involving the four employees. The first entailed a general discussion of the aspects that made such material more or less difficult to identify; the second focused around images where there had been either agreement (n = 20) or disagreement (n = 36) across coders that the images were of an indecent nature. Using thematic analysis, a number of factors apparent within IIOC were revealed to make the determination of youthfulness and indecency significantly more challenging for coders, with most relating to the developmental stage of the victim and the ambiguity of the context of an image. Findings are discussed in light of their implications for the identification of victims of ongoing sexual exploitation/abuse, the assessment and treatment of individuals in possession of IIOC, as well as the practice of policing and sentencing this type of offending behavior. SAGE Publications 2017-09-01 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6360483/ /pubmed/28863730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724768 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Kloess, Juliane A.
Woodhams, Jessica
Whittle, Helen
Grant, Tim
Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E.
The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material
title The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material
title_full The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material
title_fullStr The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material
title_full_unstemmed The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material
title_short The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material
title_sort challenges of identifying and classifying child sexual abuse material
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724768
work_keys_str_mv AT kloessjulianea thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT woodhamsjessica thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT whittlehelen thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT granttim thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT hamiltongiachritsiscatherinee thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT kloessjulianea challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT woodhamsjessica challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT whittlehelen challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT granttim challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial
AT hamiltongiachritsiscatherinee challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial