Cargando…
The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material
The aim of the present study was to (a) assess the reliability with which indecent images of children (IIOC) are classified as being of an indecent versus nonindecent nature, and (b) examine in detail the decision-making process engaged in by law enforcement personnel who undertake the difficult tas...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724768 |
_version_ | 1783392494181941248 |
---|---|
author | Kloess, Juliane A. Woodhams, Jessica Whittle, Helen Grant, Tim Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E. |
author_facet | Kloess, Juliane A. Woodhams, Jessica Whittle, Helen Grant, Tim Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E. |
author_sort | Kloess, Juliane A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to (a) assess the reliability with which indecent images of children (IIOC) are classified as being of an indecent versus nonindecent nature, and (b) examine in detail the decision-making process engaged in by law enforcement personnel who undertake the difficult task of identifying and classifying IIOC as per the current legislative offense categories. One experienced researcher and four employees from a police force in the United Kingdom coded an extensive amount of IIOC (n = 1,212-2,233) to determine if they (a) were deemed to be of an indecent nature, and (b) depicted a child. Interrater reliability analyses revealed both considerable agreement and disagreement across coders, which were followed up with two focus groups involving the four employees. The first entailed a general discussion of the aspects that made such material more or less difficult to identify; the second focused around images where there had been either agreement (n = 20) or disagreement (n = 36) across coders that the images were of an indecent nature. Using thematic analysis, a number of factors apparent within IIOC were revealed to make the determination of youthfulness and indecency significantly more challenging for coders, with most relating to the developmental stage of the victim and the ambiguity of the context of an image. Findings are discussed in light of their implications for the identification of victims of ongoing sexual exploitation/abuse, the assessment and treatment of individuals in possession of IIOC, as well as the practice of policing and sentencing this type of offending behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6360483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63604832019-02-20 The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material Kloess, Juliane A. Woodhams, Jessica Whittle, Helen Grant, Tim Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E. Sex Abuse Articles The aim of the present study was to (a) assess the reliability with which indecent images of children (IIOC) are classified as being of an indecent versus nonindecent nature, and (b) examine in detail the decision-making process engaged in by law enforcement personnel who undertake the difficult task of identifying and classifying IIOC as per the current legislative offense categories. One experienced researcher and four employees from a police force in the United Kingdom coded an extensive amount of IIOC (n = 1,212-2,233) to determine if they (a) were deemed to be of an indecent nature, and (b) depicted a child. Interrater reliability analyses revealed both considerable agreement and disagreement across coders, which were followed up with two focus groups involving the four employees. The first entailed a general discussion of the aspects that made such material more or less difficult to identify; the second focused around images where there had been either agreement (n = 20) or disagreement (n = 36) across coders that the images were of an indecent nature. Using thematic analysis, a number of factors apparent within IIOC were revealed to make the determination of youthfulness and indecency significantly more challenging for coders, with most relating to the developmental stage of the victim and the ambiguity of the context of an image. Findings are discussed in light of their implications for the identification of victims of ongoing sexual exploitation/abuse, the assessment and treatment of individuals in possession of IIOC, as well as the practice of policing and sentencing this type of offending behavior. SAGE Publications 2017-09-01 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6360483/ /pubmed/28863730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724768 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Kloess, Juliane A. Woodhams, Jessica Whittle, Helen Grant, Tim Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine E. The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material |
title | The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material |
title_full | The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material |
title_fullStr | The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material |
title_full_unstemmed | The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material |
title_short | The Challenges of Identifying and Classifying Child Sexual Abuse Material |
title_sort | challenges of identifying and classifying child sexual abuse material |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28863730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kloessjulianea thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT woodhamsjessica thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT whittlehelen thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT granttim thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT hamiltongiachritsiscatherinee thechallengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT kloessjulianea challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT woodhamsjessica challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT whittlehelen challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT granttim challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial AT hamiltongiachritsiscatherinee challengesofidentifyingandclassifyingchildsexualabusematerial |