Cargando…
How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E (M) can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025711 |
_version_ | 1783392497527947264 |
---|---|
author | Genestreti, K. J. Nakamura, T. K. M. Nakamura, R. Denton, R. E. Torbert, R. B. Burch, J. L. Plaschke, F. Fuselier, S. A. Ergun, R. E. Giles, B. L. Russell, C. T. |
author_facet | Genestreti, K. J. Nakamura, T. K. M. Nakamura, R. Denton, R. E. Torbert, R. B. Burch, J. L. Plaschke, F. Fuselier, S. A. Ergun, R. E. Giles, B. L. Russell, C. T. |
author_sort | Genestreti, K. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E (M) can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in E (M) that result from errors in an L M N boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several L M N coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate E (M). We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly E (M) = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA‐v (e)), MVA of E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD‐B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle‐in‐cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA‐v (e) and MDD‐B. The L and M directions are most reliably determined by MVA‐v (e) when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the M direction obtained by MDD‐B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD‐B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify E (M) from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6360497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63604972019-02-14 How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? Genestreti, K. J. Nakamura, T. K. M. Nakamura, R. Denton, R. E. Torbert, R. B. Burch, J. L. Plaschke, F. Fuselier, S. A. Ergun, R. E. Giles, B. L. Russell, C. T. J Geophys Res Space Phys Research Articles We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E (M) can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in E (M) that result from errors in an L M N boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several L M N coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate E (M). We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly E (M) = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA‐v (e)), MVA of E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD‐B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle‐in‐cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA‐v (e) and MDD‐B. The L and M directions are most reliably determined by MVA‐v (e) when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the M direction obtained by MDD‐B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD‐B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify E (M) from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-10 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6360497/ /pubmed/30775197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025711 Text en ©2018. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Genestreti, K. J. Nakamura, T. K. M. Nakamura, R. Denton, R. E. Torbert, R. B. Burch, J. L. Plaschke, F. Fuselier, S. A. Ergun, R. E. Giles, B. L. Russell, C. T. How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? |
title | How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E
(M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? |
title_full | How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E
(M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? |
title_fullStr | How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E
(M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E
(M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? |
title_short | How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E
(M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? |
title_sort | how accurately can we measure the reconnection rate e
(m) for the mms diffusion region event of 11 july 2017? |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025711 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT genestretikj howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT nakamuratkm howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT nakamurar howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT dentonre howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT torbertrb howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT burchjl howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT plaschkef howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT fuseliersa howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT ergunre howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT gilesbl howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 AT russellct howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017 |