Cargando…

How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?

We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E (M) can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Genestreti, K. J., Nakamura, T. K. M., Nakamura, R., Denton, R. E., Torbert, R. B., Burch, J. L., Plaschke, F., Fuselier, S. A., Ergun, R. E., Giles, B. L., Russell, C. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025711
_version_ 1783392497527947264
author Genestreti, K. J.
Nakamura, T. K. M.
Nakamura, R.
Denton, R. E.
Torbert, R. B.
Burch, J. L.
Plaschke, F.
Fuselier, S. A.
Ergun, R. E.
Giles, B. L.
Russell, C. T.
author_facet Genestreti, K. J.
Nakamura, T. K. M.
Nakamura, R.
Denton, R. E.
Torbert, R. B.
Burch, J. L.
Plaschke, F.
Fuselier, S. A.
Ergun, R. E.
Giles, B. L.
Russell, C. T.
author_sort Genestreti, K. J.
collection PubMed
description We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E (M) can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in E (M) that result from errors in an L M N boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several L M N coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate E (M). We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly E (M) = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA‐v (e)), MVA of E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD‐B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle‐in‐cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA‐v (e) and MDD‐B. The L and M directions are most reliably determined by MVA‐v (e) when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the M direction obtained by MDD‐B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD‐B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify E (M) from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63604972019-02-14 How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? Genestreti, K. J. Nakamura, T. K. M. Nakamura, R. Denton, R. E. Torbert, R. B. Burch, J. L. Plaschke, F. Fuselier, S. A. Ergun, R. E. Giles, B. L. Russell, C. T. J Geophys Res Space Phys Research Articles We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E (M) can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in E (M) that result from errors in an L M N boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several L M N coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate E (M). We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly E (M) = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA‐v (e)), MVA of E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD‐B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle‐in‐cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA‐v (e) and MDD‐B. The L and M directions are most reliably determined by MVA‐v (e) when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the M direction obtained by MDD‐B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD‐B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify E (M) from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-10 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6360497/ /pubmed/30775197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025711 Text en ©2018. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Genestreti, K. J.
Nakamura, T. K. M.
Nakamura, R.
Denton, R. E.
Torbert, R. B.
Burch, J. L.
Plaschke, F.
Fuselier, S. A.
Ergun, R. E.
Giles, B. L.
Russell, C. T.
How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
title How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
title_full How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
title_fullStr How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
title_full_unstemmed How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
title_short How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E (M) for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
title_sort how accurately can we measure the reconnection rate e (m) for the mms diffusion region event of 11 july 2017?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025711
work_keys_str_mv AT genestretikj howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT nakamuratkm howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT nakamurar howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT dentonre howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT torbertrb howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT burchjl howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT plaschkef howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT fuseliersa howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT ergunre howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT gilesbl howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017
AT russellct howaccuratelycanwemeasurethereconnectionrateemforthemmsdiffusionregioneventof11july2017