Cargando…

A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM) is a technology-assisted health coaching intervention to improve weight management in primary care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that we designed through prior rigorous formative studies. GEM is integrated within the patient-centered medica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viglione, Clare, Bouwman, Dylaney, Rahman, Nadera, Fang, Yixin, Beasley, Jeannette M., Sherman, Scott, Pi-Sunyer, Xavier, Wylie-Rosett, Judith, Tenner, Craig, Jay, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0
_version_ 1783392546056044544
author Viglione, Clare
Bouwman, Dylaney
Rahman, Nadera
Fang, Yixin
Beasley, Jeannette M.
Sherman, Scott
Pi-Sunyer, Xavier
Wylie-Rosett, Judith
Tenner, Craig
Jay, Melanie
author_facet Viglione, Clare
Bouwman, Dylaney
Rahman, Nadera
Fang, Yixin
Beasley, Jeannette M.
Sherman, Scott
Pi-Sunyer, Xavier
Wylie-Rosett, Judith
Tenner, Craig
Jay, Melanie
author_sort Viglione, Clare
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM) is a technology-assisted health coaching intervention to improve weight management in primary care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that we designed through prior rigorous formative studies. GEM is integrated within the patient-centered medical home and utilizes student health coach volunteers to counsel patients and encourage participation in VHA’s intensive weight management program, MOVE!. The primary aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of GEM when compared to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC). Our secondary aim was to test the impact of GEM on weight, diet and physical activity when compared to EUC. METHODS: Veterans with a Body Mass Index ≥30 kg/m(2) or 25–29.9 kg/m(2) with comorbidities (n = 45) were recruited in two phases and randomized to GEM (n = 22) or EUC (n = 23). We collected process measures (e.g. number of coaching calls completed, number and types of lifestyle goals, counseling documentation) and qualitative feedback on quality of counseling and acceptability of call duration. We also measured weight and behavioral outcomes. RESULTS: GEM participants reported receiving high quality counseling from health coaches and that call duration and frequency were acceptable. They received 5.9 (SD = 3.7) of 12 coaching calls on average, and number of coaching calls completed was associated with greater weight loss at 6-months in GEM participants (Spearman Coefficient = 0.71, p < 0.001). Four participants from GEM and two from EUC attended the MOVE! program. PCPs completed clinical reminders in 12% of PCP visits with GEM participants. Trends show that GEM participants (n = 21) tended to lose more weight at 3-, 6-, and 12-months as compared to EUC, but this was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in diet or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a technology assisted health coaching intervention delivered within primary care using student health coaches was feasible and acceptable to Veteran patients. This pilot study helped elucidate challenges such as low provider engagement, difficulties with health coach continuity, and low patient attendance in MOVE! which we have addressed and plan to test in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03006328 Retrospectively registered on December 30, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63606752019-02-14 A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial Viglione, Clare Bouwman, Dylaney Rahman, Nadera Fang, Yixin Beasley, Jeannette M. Sherman, Scott Pi-Sunyer, Xavier Wylie-Rosett, Judith Tenner, Craig Jay, Melanie BMC Obes Research Article BACKGROUND: Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM) is a technology-assisted health coaching intervention to improve weight management in primary care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that we designed through prior rigorous formative studies. GEM is integrated within the patient-centered medical home and utilizes student health coach volunteers to counsel patients and encourage participation in VHA’s intensive weight management program, MOVE!. The primary aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of GEM when compared to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC). Our secondary aim was to test the impact of GEM on weight, diet and physical activity when compared to EUC. METHODS: Veterans with a Body Mass Index ≥30 kg/m(2) or 25–29.9 kg/m(2) with comorbidities (n = 45) were recruited in two phases and randomized to GEM (n = 22) or EUC (n = 23). We collected process measures (e.g. number of coaching calls completed, number and types of lifestyle goals, counseling documentation) and qualitative feedback on quality of counseling and acceptability of call duration. We also measured weight and behavioral outcomes. RESULTS: GEM participants reported receiving high quality counseling from health coaches and that call duration and frequency were acceptable. They received 5.9 (SD = 3.7) of 12 coaching calls on average, and number of coaching calls completed was associated with greater weight loss at 6-months in GEM participants (Spearman Coefficient = 0.71, p < 0.001). Four participants from GEM and two from EUC attended the MOVE! program. PCPs completed clinical reminders in 12% of PCP visits with GEM participants. Trends show that GEM participants (n = 21) tended to lose more weight at 3-, 6-, and 12-months as compared to EUC, but this was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in diet or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a technology assisted health coaching intervention delivered within primary care using student health coaches was feasible and acceptable to Veteran patients. This pilot study helped elucidate challenges such as low provider engagement, difficulties with health coach continuity, and low patient attendance in MOVE! which we have addressed and plan to test in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03006328 Retrospectively registered on December 30, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6360675/ /pubmed/30766686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Viglione, Clare
Bouwman, Dylaney
Rahman, Nadera
Fang, Yixin
Beasley, Jeannette M.
Sherman, Scott
Pi-Sunyer, Xavier
Wylie-Rosett, Judith
Tenner, Craig
Jay, Melanie
A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_full A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_short A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for primary care-based obesity treatment: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0
work_keys_str_mv AT viglioneclare atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bouwmandylaney atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rahmannadera atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fangyixin atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT beasleyjeannettem atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shermanscott atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pisunyerxavier atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wylierosettjudith atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tennercraig atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jaymelanie atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT viglioneclare technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bouwmandylaney technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rahmannadera technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fangyixin technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT beasleyjeannettem technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shermanscott technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pisunyerxavier technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wylierosettjudith technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tennercraig technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jaymelanie technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial