Cargando…
A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM) is a technology-assisted health coaching intervention to improve weight management in primary care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that we designed through prior rigorous formative studies. GEM is integrated within the patient-centered medica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0 |
_version_ | 1783392546056044544 |
---|---|
author | Viglione, Clare Bouwman, Dylaney Rahman, Nadera Fang, Yixin Beasley, Jeannette M. Sherman, Scott Pi-Sunyer, Xavier Wylie-Rosett, Judith Tenner, Craig Jay, Melanie |
author_facet | Viglione, Clare Bouwman, Dylaney Rahman, Nadera Fang, Yixin Beasley, Jeannette M. Sherman, Scott Pi-Sunyer, Xavier Wylie-Rosett, Judith Tenner, Craig Jay, Melanie |
author_sort | Viglione, Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM) is a technology-assisted health coaching intervention to improve weight management in primary care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that we designed through prior rigorous formative studies. GEM is integrated within the patient-centered medical home and utilizes student health coach volunteers to counsel patients and encourage participation in VHA’s intensive weight management program, MOVE!. The primary aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of GEM when compared to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC). Our secondary aim was to test the impact of GEM on weight, diet and physical activity when compared to EUC. METHODS: Veterans with a Body Mass Index ≥30 kg/m(2) or 25–29.9 kg/m(2) with comorbidities (n = 45) were recruited in two phases and randomized to GEM (n = 22) or EUC (n = 23). We collected process measures (e.g. number of coaching calls completed, number and types of lifestyle goals, counseling documentation) and qualitative feedback on quality of counseling and acceptability of call duration. We also measured weight and behavioral outcomes. RESULTS: GEM participants reported receiving high quality counseling from health coaches and that call duration and frequency were acceptable. They received 5.9 (SD = 3.7) of 12 coaching calls on average, and number of coaching calls completed was associated with greater weight loss at 6-months in GEM participants (Spearman Coefficient = 0.71, p < 0.001). Four participants from GEM and two from EUC attended the MOVE! program. PCPs completed clinical reminders in 12% of PCP visits with GEM participants. Trends show that GEM participants (n = 21) tended to lose more weight at 3-, 6-, and 12-months as compared to EUC, but this was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in diet or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a technology assisted health coaching intervention delivered within primary care using student health coaches was feasible and acceptable to Veteran patients. This pilot study helped elucidate challenges such as low provider engagement, difficulties with health coach continuity, and low patient attendance in MOVE! which we have addressed and plan to test in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03006328 Retrospectively registered on December 30, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6360675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63606752019-02-14 A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial Viglione, Clare Bouwman, Dylaney Rahman, Nadera Fang, Yixin Beasley, Jeannette M. Sherman, Scott Pi-Sunyer, Xavier Wylie-Rosett, Judith Tenner, Craig Jay, Melanie BMC Obes Research Article BACKGROUND: Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM) is a technology-assisted health coaching intervention to improve weight management in primary care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that we designed through prior rigorous formative studies. GEM is integrated within the patient-centered medical home and utilizes student health coach volunteers to counsel patients and encourage participation in VHA’s intensive weight management program, MOVE!. The primary aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of GEM when compared to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC). Our secondary aim was to test the impact of GEM on weight, diet and physical activity when compared to EUC. METHODS: Veterans with a Body Mass Index ≥30 kg/m(2) or 25–29.9 kg/m(2) with comorbidities (n = 45) were recruited in two phases and randomized to GEM (n = 22) or EUC (n = 23). We collected process measures (e.g. number of coaching calls completed, number and types of lifestyle goals, counseling documentation) and qualitative feedback on quality of counseling and acceptability of call duration. We also measured weight and behavioral outcomes. RESULTS: GEM participants reported receiving high quality counseling from health coaches and that call duration and frequency were acceptable. They received 5.9 (SD = 3.7) of 12 coaching calls on average, and number of coaching calls completed was associated with greater weight loss at 6-months in GEM participants (Spearman Coefficient = 0.71, p < 0.001). Four participants from GEM and two from EUC attended the MOVE! program. PCPs completed clinical reminders in 12% of PCP visits with GEM participants. Trends show that GEM participants (n = 21) tended to lose more weight at 3-, 6-, and 12-months as compared to EUC, but this was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in diet or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a technology assisted health coaching intervention delivered within primary care using student health coaches was feasible and acceptable to Veteran patients. This pilot study helped elucidate challenges such as low provider engagement, difficulties with health coach continuity, and low patient attendance in MOVE! which we have addressed and plan to test in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03006328 Retrospectively registered on December 30, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6360675/ /pubmed/30766686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Viglione, Clare Bouwman, Dylaney Rahman, Nadera Fang, Yixin Beasley, Jeannette M. Sherman, Scott Pi-Sunyer, Xavier Wylie-Rosett, Judith Tenner, Craig Jay, Melanie A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title | A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for primary care-based obesity treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0226-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viglioneclare atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bouwmandylaney atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rahmannadera atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fangyixin atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT beasleyjeannettem atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shermanscott atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pisunyerxavier atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wylierosettjudith atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tennercraig atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jaymelanie atechnologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT viglioneclare technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bouwmandylaney technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rahmannadera technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fangyixin technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT beasleyjeannettem technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shermanscott technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pisunyerxavier technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wylierosettjudith technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tennercraig technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jaymelanie technologyassistedhealthcoachinginterventionvsenhancedusualcareforprimarycarebasedobesitytreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial |