Cargando…

The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making

BACKGROUND: Older people with advanced kidney disease require information and support from clinicians when deciding whether to have dialysis or conservative (non-dialysis) care. There is evidence that communication practices, information provision and treatment rates vary widely across renal units....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selman, Lucy Ellen, Bristowe, Katherine, Higginson, Irene J., Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4
_version_ 1783392573695459328
author Selman, Lucy Ellen
Bristowe, Katherine
Higginson, Irene J.
Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
author_facet Selman, Lucy Ellen
Bristowe, Katherine
Higginson, Irene J.
Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
author_sort Selman, Lucy Ellen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older people with advanced kidney disease require information and support from clinicians when deciding whether to have dialysis or conservative (non-dialysis) care. There is evidence that communication practices, information provision and treatment rates vary widely across renal units. However, experiences of communicating with clinicians among patients receiving conservative care are poorly understood. This evidence is essential to ensure support is patient-centred and equitable. Our aim was to explore views and experiences of communication, information provision and treatment decision-making among older patients receiving conservative care. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease from three UK renal units. Purposive sampling captured variation in age, co-morbidity and functional status. Interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: 20 patients were interviewed (11 were men; median age 82 (range 69–95)). Participants described positive experiences of communicating with clinicians and receiving information, but also negative experiences involving insensitivity, rushing or ambiguity. Participants reported clinicians omitting/avoiding conversations regarding diagnosis and prognosis, and described what helped and hindered good communication and support. They wanted information about their treatment options and illness, but expressed ambivalence about knowing details of disease progression. Clinicians’ views and recommendations regarding treatment influenced patients’ decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients report variable quality in communication with clinicians and gaps in the information received. Uncertainty about the disease trajectory and patients’ ambivalence regarding information makes communication particularly challenging for clinicians. Tailoring information to patient preferences and conveying it clearly and sensitively is critical. Renal clinicians require support and training to ensure decision-making support for older patients is patient-centred. Future research should examine how clinicians’ communication practices influence treatment decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63607692019-02-08 The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making Selman, Lucy Ellen Bristowe, Katherine Higginson, Irene J. Murtagh, Fliss E. M. BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Older people with advanced kidney disease require information and support from clinicians when deciding whether to have dialysis or conservative (non-dialysis) care. There is evidence that communication practices, information provision and treatment rates vary widely across renal units. However, experiences of communicating with clinicians among patients receiving conservative care are poorly understood. This evidence is essential to ensure support is patient-centred and equitable. Our aim was to explore views and experiences of communication, information provision and treatment decision-making among older patients receiving conservative care. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease from three UK renal units. Purposive sampling captured variation in age, co-morbidity and functional status. Interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: 20 patients were interviewed (11 were men; median age 82 (range 69–95)). Participants described positive experiences of communicating with clinicians and receiving information, but also negative experiences involving insensitivity, rushing or ambiguity. Participants reported clinicians omitting/avoiding conversations regarding diagnosis and prognosis, and described what helped and hindered good communication and support. They wanted information about their treatment options and illness, but expressed ambivalence about knowing details of disease progression. Clinicians’ views and recommendations regarding treatment influenced patients’ decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients report variable quality in communication with clinicians and gaps in the information received. Uncertainty about the disease trajectory and patients’ ambivalence regarding information makes communication particularly challenging for clinicians. Tailoring information to patient preferences and conveying it clearly and sensitively is critical. Renal clinicians require support and training to ensure decision-making support for older patients is patient-centred. Future research should examine how clinicians’ communication practices influence treatment decision-making. BioMed Central 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6360769/ /pubmed/30717686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Selman, Lucy Ellen
Bristowe, Katherine
Higginson, Irene J.
Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making
title The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making
title_full The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making
title_fullStr The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making
title_full_unstemmed The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making
title_short The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making
title_sort views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4
work_keys_str_mv AT selmanlucyellen theviewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking
AT bristowekatherine theviewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking
AT higginsonirenej theviewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking
AT murtaghflissem theviewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking
AT selmanlucyellen viewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking
AT bristowekatherine viewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking
AT higginsonirenej viewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking
AT murtaghflissem viewsandexperiencesofolderpeoplewithconservativelymanagedrenalfailureaqualitativestudyofcommunicationinformationanddecisionmaking