Cargando…

Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study

BACKGROUND: Effective use of microbiology test results may positively influence patient outcomes and limit the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, studies indicate that their potential is not fully utilized. We investigated microbiology test ordering practices and the use of test results for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skodvin, Brita, Wathne, Jannicke S., Lindemann, P. Christoffer, Harthug, Stig, Nilsen, Roy M., Charani, Esmita, Syre, Heidi, Kittang, Baard R., Kleppe, Lars K. S., Smith, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0480-z
_version_ 1783392579421732864
author Skodvin, Brita
Wathne, Jannicke S.
Lindemann, P. Christoffer
Harthug, Stig
Nilsen, Roy M.
Charani, Esmita
Syre, Heidi
Kittang, Baard R.
Kleppe, Lars K. S.
Smith, Ingrid
author_facet Skodvin, Brita
Wathne, Jannicke S.
Lindemann, P. Christoffer
Harthug, Stig
Nilsen, Roy M.
Charani, Esmita
Syre, Heidi
Kittang, Baard R.
Kleppe, Lars K. S.
Smith, Ingrid
author_sort Skodvin, Brita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective use of microbiology test results may positively influence patient outcomes and limit the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, studies indicate that their potential is not fully utilized. We investigated microbiology test ordering practices and the use of test results for antibiotic decision-making in hospitals. METHODS: A multicentre cohort study was conducted during five months in 2014 in Medical departments across three hospitals in Western Norway. Patients treated with antibiotics for sepsis, urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, lower respiratory tract infections or acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included in the analysis. Primary outcome measures were degree of microbiology test ordering, compliance with microbiology testing recommendations in the national antibiotic guideline and proportion of microbiology test results used to inform antibiotic treatment. Data was obtained from electronic- and paper medical records and charts and laboratory information systems. RESULTS: Of the 1731 patient admissions during the study period, mean compliance with microbiology testing recommendations in the antibiotic guideline was 89%, ranging from 81% in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to 95% in patients with sepsis. Substantial additional testing was performed beyond the recommendations with 298/606 (49%) of patients with lower respiratory tract infections having urine cultures and 42/194 (22%) of patients with urinary tract infections having respiratory tests. Microbiology test results from one of the hospitals showed that 18% (120/672) of patient admissions had applicable test results, but only half of them were used for therapy guidance, i.e. in total, 9% (63/672) of patient admissions had test results informing prescription of antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that despite a large number of microbiology test orders, only a limited number of tests informed antibiotic treatment. To ensure that microbiology tests are used optimally, there is a need to review the utility of existing microbiology tests, test ordering practices and use of test results through a more targeted and overarching approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6360791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63607912019-02-08 Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study Skodvin, Brita Wathne, Jannicke S. Lindemann, P. Christoffer Harthug, Stig Nilsen, Roy M. Charani, Esmita Syre, Heidi Kittang, Baard R. Kleppe, Lars K. S. Smith, Ingrid Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Effective use of microbiology test results may positively influence patient outcomes and limit the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, studies indicate that their potential is not fully utilized. We investigated microbiology test ordering practices and the use of test results for antibiotic decision-making in hospitals. METHODS: A multicentre cohort study was conducted during five months in 2014 in Medical departments across three hospitals in Western Norway. Patients treated with antibiotics for sepsis, urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, lower respiratory tract infections or acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included in the analysis. Primary outcome measures were degree of microbiology test ordering, compliance with microbiology testing recommendations in the national antibiotic guideline and proportion of microbiology test results used to inform antibiotic treatment. Data was obtained from electronic- and paper medical records and charts and laboratory information systems. RESULTS: Of the 1731 patient admissions during the study period, mean compliance with microbiology testing recommendations in the antibiotic guideline was 89%, ranging from 81% in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to 95% in patients with sepsis. Substantial additional testing was performed beyond the recommendations with 298/606 (49%) of patients with lower respiratory tract infections having urine cultures and 42/194 (22%) of patients with urinary tract infections having respiratory tests. Microbiology test results from one of the hospitals showed that 18% (120/672) of patient admissions had applicable test results, but only half of them were used for therapy guidance, i.e. in total, 9% (63/672) of patient admissions had test results informing prescription of antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that despite a large number of microbiology test orders, only a limited number of tests informed antibiotic treatment. To ensure that microbiology tests are used optimally, there is a need to review the utility of existing microbiology tests, test ordering practices and use of test results through a more targeted and overarching approach. BioMed Central 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6360791/ /pubmed/30740221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0480-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Skodvin, Brita
Wathne, Jannicke S.
Lindemann, P. Christoffer
Harthug, Stig
Nilsen, Roy M.
Charani, Esmita
Syre, Heidi
Kittang, Baard R.
Kleppe, Lars K. S.
Smith, Ingrid
Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study
title Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study
title_full Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study
title_fullStr Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study
title_short Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study
title_sort use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing amr rates– a multicentre hospital cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0480-z
work_keys_str_mv AT skodvinbrita useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT wathnejannickes useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT lindemannpchristoffer useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT harthugstig useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT nilsenroym useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT charaniesmita useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT syreheidi useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT kittangbaardr useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT kleppelarsks useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy
AT smithingrid useofmicrobiologytestsintheeraofincreasingamrratesamulticentrehospitalcohortstudy