Cargando…
Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to collate all available evidence on the impact of point-of-care C reactive protein (CRP) testing on patient-relevant outcomes in children and adults in ambulatory care. DESIGN: This was a systematic review to identify controlled studies assessing the impact of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025036 |
_version_ | 1783392671693275136 |
---|---|
author | Verbakel, Jan Y Lee, Joseph J Goyder, Clare Tan, Pui San Ananthakumar, Thanusha Turner, Philip J Hayward, Gail Van den Bruel, Ann |
author_facet | Verbakel, Jan Y Lee, Joseph J Goyder, Clare Tan, Pui San Ananthakumar, Thanusha Turner, Philip J Hayward, Gail Van den Bruel, Ann |
author_sort | Verbakel, Jan Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to collate all available evidence on the impact of point-of-care C reactive protein (CRP) testing on patient-relevant outcomes in children and adults in ambulatory care. DESIGN: This was a systematic review to identify controlled studies assessing the impact of point-of-care CRP in patients presenting to ambulatory care services. Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL, DARE, Science Citation Index were searched from inception to March 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Controlled studies assessing the impact of point-of-care CRP in patients presenting to ambulatory care services, measuring a change in clinical care, including but not limited to antibiotic prescribing rate, reconsultation, clinical recovery, patient satisfaction, referral and additional tests. No language restrictions were applied. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on setting, date of study, a description of the intervention and control group, patient characteristics and results. Methodological quality of selected studies and assessment of potential bias was assessed independently by two authors using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: 11 randomised controlled trials and 8 non-randomised controlled studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 16 064 patients. All included studies had a high risk of performance and selection bias. Compared with usual care, point-of-care CRP reduces immediate antibiotic prescribing (pooled risk ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.92), however, at considerable heterogeneity (I(2)=72%). This effect increased when guidance on antibiotic prescribing relative to the CRP level was provided (risk ratios of 0.68; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.74 in adults and 0.56; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.95 in children). We found no significant effect of point-of-care CRP testing on patient satisfaction, clinical recovery, reconsultation, further testing and hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a point-of-care CRP test in ambulatory care accompanied by clinical guidance on interpretation reduces the immediate antibiotic prescribing in both adults and children. As yet, available evidence does not suggest an effect on other patient outcomes or healthcare processes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016035426; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6361331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63613312019-03-10 Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis Verbakel, Jan Y Lee, Joseph J Goyder, Clare Tan, Pui San Ananthakumar, Thanusha Turner, Philip J Hayward, Gail Van den Bruel, Ann BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to collate all available evidence on the impact of point-of-care C reactive protein (CRP) testing on patient-relevant outcomes in children and adults in ambulatory care. DESIGN: This was a systematic review to identify controlled studies assessing the impact of point-of-care CRP in patients presenting to ambulatory care services. Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL, DARE, Science Citation Index were searched from inception to March 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Controlled studies assessing the impact of point-of-care CRP in patients presenting to ambulatory care services, measuring a change in clinical care, including but not limited to antibiotic prescribing rate, reconsultation, clinical recovery, patient satisfaction, referral and additional tests. No language restrictions were applied. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on setting, date of study, a description of the intervention and control group, patient characteristics and results. Methodological quality of selected studies and assessment of potential bias was assessed independently by two authors using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: 11 randomised controlled trials and 8 non-randomised controlled studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 16 064 patients. All included studies had a high risk of performance and selection bias. Compared with usual care, point-of-care CRP reduces immediate antibiotic prescribing (pooled risk ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.92), however, at considerable heterogeneity (I(2)=72%). This effect increased when guidance on antibiotic prescribing relative to the CRP level was provided (risk ratios of 0.68; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.74 in adults and 0.56; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.95 in children). We found no significant effect of point-of-care CRP testing on patient satisfaction, clinical recovery, reconsultation, further testing and hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a point-of-care CRP test in ambulatory care accompanied by clinical guidance on interpretation reduces the immediate antibiotic prescribing in both adults and children. As yet, available evidence does not suggest an effect on other patient outcomes or healthcare processes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016035426; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6361331/ /pubmed/30782747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025036 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Verbakel, Jan Y Lee, Joseph J Goyder, Clare Tan, Pui San Ananthakumar, Thanusha Turner, Philip J Hayward, Gail Van den Bruel, Ann Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of point-of-care c reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verbakeljany impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leejosephj impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT goyderclare impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanpuisan impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ananthakumarthanusha impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT turnerphilipj impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haywardgail impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vandenbruelann impactofpointofcarecreactiveproteininambulatorycareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |