Cargando…

Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?

The Doha Development Agenda recognizes the central role that international trade can play in the promotion of economic development. In fact, the increase of exports from developing countries to developed nations' markets has been considered a key element for developing countries to realize the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gil-Pareja, Salvador, Llorca-Vivero, Rafael, Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30716084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210446
_version_ 1783392681769041920
author Gil-Pareja, Salvador
Llorca-Vivero, Rafael
Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio
author_facet Gil-Pareja, Salvador
Llorca-Vivero, Rafael
Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio
author_sort Gil-Pareja, Salvador
collection PubMed
description The Doha Development Agenda recognizes the central role that international trade can play in the promotion of economic development. In fact, the increase of exports from developing countries to developed nations' markets has been considered a key element for developing countries to realize the potential benefits of globalization. Over the last decades, developed countries have provided preferential access to their markets to developing countries through nonreciprocal trade agreements. Moreover, developing countries have also participated in reciprocal trade agreements. This paper re-examines comparatively the effect of both kinds of trade agreements on exports from developing countries but also from the developed world. In line with other studies, our results across specifications are unstable. However, the results of our preferred specification give additional support to the argument raised by critics of nonreciprocal preference regimes who consider that developing countries should abandon their reliance on one-way trade preferences in favor of reciprocal agreements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6361425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63614252019-02-15 Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? Gil-Pareja, Salvador Llorca-Vivero, Rafael Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio PLoS One Research Article The Doha Development Agenda recognizes the central role that international trade can play in the promotion of economic development. In fact, the increase of exports from developing countries to developed nations' markets has been considered a key element for developing countries to realize the potential benefits of globalization. Over the last decades, developed countries have provided preferential access to their markets to developing countries through nonreciprocal trade agreements. Moreover, developing countries have also participated in reciprocal trade agreements. This paper re-examines comparatively the effect of both kinds of trade agreements on exports from developing countries but also from the developed world. In line with other studies, our results across specifications are unstable. However, the results of our preferred specification give additional support to the argument raised by critics of nonreciprocal preference regimes who consider that developing countries should abandon their reliance on one-way trade preferences in favor of reciprocal agreements. Public Library of Science 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6361425/ /pubmed/30716084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210446 Text en © 2019 Gil-Pareja et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gil-Pareja, Salvador
Llorca-Vivero, Rafael
Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio
Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?
title Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?
title_full Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?
title_fullStr Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?
title_full_unstemmed Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?
title_short Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?
title_sort reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: which have been best to promote exports?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30716084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210446
work_keys_str_mv AT gilparejasalvador reciprocalvsnonreciprocaltradeagreementswhichhavebeenbesttopromoteexports
AT llorcaviverorafael reciprocalvsnonreciprocaltradeagreementswhichhavebeenbesttopromoteexports
AT martinezserranojoseantonio reciprocalvsnonreciprocaltradeagreementswhichhavebeenbesttopromoteexports