Cargando…
Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?
The Doha Development Agenda recognizes the central role that international trade can play in the promotion of economic development. In fact, the increase of exports from developing countries to developed nations' markets has been considered a key element for developing countries to realize the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30716084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210446 |
_version_ | 1783392681769041920 |
---|---|
author | Gil-Pareja, Salvador Llorca-Vivero, Rafael Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio |
author_facet | Gil-Pareja, Salvador Llorca-Vivero, Rafael Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio |
author_sort | Gil-Pareja, Salvador |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Doha Development Agenda recognizes the central role that international trade can play in the promotion of economic development. In fact, the increase of exports from developing countries to developed nations' markets has been considered a key element for developing countries to realize the potential benefits of globalization. Over the last decades, developed countries have provided preferential access to their markets to developing countries through nonreciprocal trade agreements. Moreover, developing countries have also participated in reciprocal trade agreements. This paper re-examines comparatively the effect of both kinds of trade agreements on exports from developing countries but also from the developed world. In line with other studies, our results across specifications are unstable. However, the results of our preferred specification give additional support to the argument raised by critics of nonreciprocal preference regimes who consider that developing countries should abandon their reliance on one-way trade preferences in favor of reciprocal agreements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6361425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63614252019-02-15 Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? Gil-Pareja, Salvador Llorca-Vivero, Rafael Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio PLoS One Research Article The Doha Development Agenda recognizes the central role that international trade can play in the promotion of economic development. In fact, the increase of exports from developing countries to developed nations' markets has been considered a key element for developing countries to realize the potential benefits of globalization. Over the last decades, developed countries have provided preferential access to their markets to developing countries through nonreciprocal trade agreements. Moreover, developing countries have also participated in reciprocal trade agreements. This paper re-examines comparatively the effect of both kinds of trade agreements on exports from developing countries but also from the developed world. In line with other studies, our results across specifications are unstable. However, the results of our preferred specification give additional support to the argument raised by critics of nonreciprocal preference regimes who consider that developing countries should abandon their reliance on one-way trade preferences in favor of reciprocal agreements. Public Library of Science 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6361425/ /pubmed/30716084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210446 Text en © 2019 Gil-Pareja et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gil-Pareja, Salvador Llorca-Vivero, Rafael Martínez-Serrano, José Antonio Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? |
title | Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? |
title_full | Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? |
title_fullStr | Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? |
title_full_unstemmed | Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? |
title_short | Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports? |
title_sort | reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: which have been best to promote exports? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30716084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilparejasalvador reciprocalvsnonreciprocaltradeagreementswhichhavebeenbesttopromoteexports AT llorcaviverorafael reciprocalvsnonreciprocaltradeagreementswhichhavebeenbesttopromoteexports AT martinezserranojoseantonio reciprocalvsnonreciprocaltradeagreementswhichhavebeenbesttopromoteexports |