Cargando…
Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL)
PURPOSE: To establish the toxicity profile of high-dose pelvic lymph node intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to assess whether it is safely deliverable at multiple centers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this phase 2 noncomparative multicenter trial, 124 patients with locally advanced, high...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30528653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.003 |
_version_ | 1783392733951426560 |
---|---|
author | Dearnaley, David Griffin, Clare L. Lewis, Rebecca Mayles, Philip Mayles, Helen Naismith, Olivia F. Harris, Victoria Scrase, Christopher D. Staffurth, John Syndikus, Isabel Zarkar, Anjali Ford, Daniel R. Rimmer, Yvonne L. Horan, Gail Khoo, Vincent Frew, John Venkitaraman, Ramachandran Hall, Emma |
author_facet | Dearnaley, David Griffin, Clare L. Lewis, Rebecca Mayles, Philip Mayles, Helen Naismith, Olivia F. Harris, Victoria Scrase, Christopher D. Staffurth, John Syndikus, Isabel Zarkar, Anjali Ford, Daniel R. Rimmer, Yvonne L. Horan, Gail Khoo, Vincent Frew, John Venkitaraman, Ramachandran Hall, Emma |
author_sort | Dearnaley, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To establish the toxicity profile of high-dose pelvic lymph node intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to assess whether it is safely deliverable at multiple centers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this phase 2 noncomparative multicenter trial, 124 patients with locally advanced, high-risk prostate cancer were randomized between prostate-only IMRT (PO) (74 Gy/37 fractions) and prostate and pelvic lymph node IMRT (P&P; 74 Gy/37 fractions to prostate, 60 Gy/37 fractions to pelvis). The primary endpoint was acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity at week 18, aiming to exclude a grade 2 or greater (G2+) toxicity-free rate of 80% in the P&P group. Key secondary endpoints included patient-reported outcomes and late toxicity. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four participants were randomized (62 PO, 62 P&P) from May 2011 to March 2013. Median follow-up was 37.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 35.4-38.9 months). Participants had a median age of 69 years (IQR, 64-74 years) and median diagnostic prostate-specific androgen level of 21.6 ng/mL (IQR, 11.8-35.1 ng/mL). At week 18, G2+ lower GI toxicity-free rates were 59 of 61 (96.7%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 90.0-99.4) for the PO group and 59 of 62 (95.2%; 90% CI, 88.0-98.7) for the P&P group. Patients in both groups reported similarly low Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire symptoms and Vaizey incontinence scores. The largest difference occurred at week 6 with 4 of 61 (7%) and 16 of 61 (26%) PO and P&P patients, respectively, experiencing G2+ toxicity. At 2 years, the cumulative proportion of RTOG G2+ GI toxicity was 16.9% (95% CI, 8.9%-30.9%) for the PO group and 24.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-57.9%) for the P&P group; in addition, RTOG G2+ bladder toxicity was 5.1% (95% CI, 1.7%-14.9%) for the PO group and 5.6% (95% CI, 1.8%-16.7%) for the P&P group. CONCLUSIONS: PIVOTAL demonstrated that high-dose pelvic lymph node IMRT can be delivered at multiple centers with a modest side effect profile. Although safety data from the present study are encouraging, the impact of P&P IMRT on disease control remains to be established. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6361768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier, Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63617682019-03-01 Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL) Dearnaley, David Griffin, Clare L. Lewis, Rebecca Mayles, Philip Mayles, Helen Naismith, Olivia F. Harris, Victoria Scrase, Christopher D. Staffurth, John Syndikus, Isabel Zarkar, Anjali Ford, Daniel R. Rimmer, Yvonne L. Horan, Gail Khoo, Vincent Frew, John Venkitaraman, Ramachandran Hall, Emma Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Article PURPOSE: To establish the toxicity profile of high-dose pelvic lymph node intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to assess whether it is safely deliverable at multiple centers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this phase 2 noncomparative multicenter trial, 124 patients with locally advanced, high-risk prostate cancer were randomized between prostate-only IMRT (PO) (74 Gy/37 fractions) and prostate and pelvic lymph node IMRT (P&P; 74 Gy/37 fractions to prostate, 60 Gy/37 fractions to pelvis). The primary endpoint was acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity at week 18, aiming to exclude a grade 2 or greater (G2+) toxicity-free rate of 80% in the P&P group. Key secondary endpoints included patient-reported outcomes and late toxicity. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four participants were randomized (62 PO, 62 P&P) from May 2011 to March 2013. Median follow-up was 37.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 35.4-38.9 months). Participants had a median age of 69 years (IQR, 64-74 years) and median diagnostic prostate-specific androgen level of 21.6 ng/mL (IQR, 11.8-35.1 ng/mL). At week 18, G2+ lower GI toxicity-free rates were 59 of 61 (96.7%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 90.0-99.4) for the PO group and 59 of 62 (95.2%; 90% CI, 88.0-98.7) for the P&P group. Patients in both groups reported similarly low Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire symptoms and Vaizey incontinence scores. The largest difference occurred at week 6 with 4 of 61 (7%) and 16 of 61 (26%) PO and P&P patients, respectively, experiencing G2+ toxicity. At 2 years, the cumulative proportion of RTOG G2+ GI toxicity was 16.9% (95% CI, 8.9%-30.9%) for the PO group and 24.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-57.9%) for the P&P group; in addition, RTOG G2+ bladder toxicity was 5.1% (95% CI, 1.7%-14.9%) for the PO group and 5.6% (95% CI, 1.8%-16.7%) for the P&P group. CONCLUSIONS: PIVOTAL demonstrated that high-dose pelvic lymph node IMRT can be delivered at multiple centers with a modest side effect profile. Although safety data from the present study are encouraging, the impact of P&P IMRT on disease control remains to be established. Elsevier, Inc 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6361768/ /pubmed/30528653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.003 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dearnaley, David Griffin, Clare L. Lewis, Rebecca Mayles, Philip Mayles, Helen Naismith, Olivia F. Harris, Victoria Scrase, Christopher D. Staffurth, John Syndikus, Isabel Zarkar, Anjali Ford, Daniel R. Rimmer, Yvonne L. Horan, Gail Khoo, Vincent Frew, John Venkitaraman, Ramachandran Hall, Emma Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL) |
title | Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL) |
title_full | Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL) |
title_fullStr | Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL) |
title_full_unstemmed | Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL) |
title_short | Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL) |
title_sort | toxicity and patient-reported outcomes of a phase 2 randomized trial of prostate and pelvic lymph node versus prostate only radiotherapy in advanced localised prostate cancer (pivotal) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30528653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dearnaleydavid toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT griffinclarel toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT lewisrebecca toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT maylesphilip toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT mayleshelen toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT naismitholiviaf toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT harrisvictoria toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT scrasechristopherd toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT staffurthjohn toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT syndikusisabel toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT zarkaranjali toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT forddanielr toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT rimmeryvonnel toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT horangail toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT khoovincent toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT frewjohn toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT venkitaramanramachandran toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal AT hallemma toxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesofaphase2randomizedtrialofprostateandpelviclymphnodeversusprostateonlyradiotherapyinadvancedlocalisedprostatecancerpivotal |